پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

مقایسه عملکرد کلنی‌های زنبورعسل (Apis mellifera L.) نگهداری‌شده در کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف باز و کف بسته

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
بخش تحقیقات علوم دامی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی کردستان، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، سنندج، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با دو تیمار و هفت تکرار با هدف مقایسه عملکرد کلنی­های­ زنبورعسل (Apis mellifera L.) نگهداری‌شده در کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف باز و کف بسته طی سال­های 1398 تا 1400 انجام شد. تیمارها شامل کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف باز و کف بسته بودند. در سال اول مطالعه (1398)، کلنی­های آزمایشی از لحاظ سن ملکه و جمعیت (نوزادان و زنبورهای بالغ) مورد همسان­سازی قرار گرفتند. در مطالعه حاضر، صفاتی از قبیل تولید عسل، جمع‌آوری گرده، جمعیت نوزادان، جمعیت زنبورهای بالغ، آلودگی به کنه واروآ و توان زمستان‌گذرانی کلنی­های زنبورعسل مورد اندازه­گیری قرار گرفت. نتایج تجزیه واریانس نشان داد که اثر تیمار بر صفات مورد مطالعه معنی­دار بود (01/0< p). نتایج مقایسه میانگین­ها نشان داد که بیشترین میانگین صفات تولید عسل (3/18 کیلوگرم)، جمع‌آوری گرده (68/175 گرم)، جمعیت نوزادان (5/12 قاب)، جمعیت زنبورهای بالغ (5/8 قاب) و توان زمستان‌گذرانی (68/0) مربوط به کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف باز و کمترین میانگین این صفات مربوط به کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف بسته بود. همچنین، بیشترین میانگین آلودگی به کنه واروآ با میانگین 165 کنه مربوط به کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف بسته و کمترین آن با میانگین 105 کنه مربوط به کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف باز بود. با عنایت به برتری معنی­دار همه صفات مورد مطالعه در کندوهای چوبی لانگستروت کف باز در مطالعه حاضر می­توان استفاده از این کندوها را برای بهبود صفات عملکردی کلنی­های زنبورعسل و افزایش بازده اقتصادی زنبورستان­ها­ در شرایط اقلیمی استان کردستان و سایر استان­های همجوار با شرایط آب و هوایی مشابه توصیه کرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Comparison of Colonies Performance of Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) Housed in Open-Bottom and Closed-Bottom Langstroth Wooden Hives

نویسندگان English

Ataollah Rahimi
Babak Rokhzad
Hamidreza Bahmani
Saleh Salehi
Baharak Mohammadian
Animal Science Research Department, Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sanandaj, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Many flowering plants rely on honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) for pollination. Any human or natural factor that threatens the survival of a honey bee colony can have a major impact on plant production. Various threats and factors affect honey bee colonies and beekeeping success, including genotype, internal hive factors (such as the queen, bee pests and diseases), and external hive factors (such as hive type, weather conditions, temperature, humidity, etc.). One of the factors that has a great impact on the success of beekeeping and increasing the performance of honey bee colonies is the type of hive. Open-bottom hives have been used in European countries including Germany for decades, but the use of open-bottom hives in Iran is new. There is not much information available to beekeepers about the use of open-bottom hives in Iran. For this reason, beekeepers do not routinely use these hives. The limited number of beekeepers who use these hives are always concerned about hive losses, especially during the cold seasons. Few studies have been conducted in Iran on the type of hive, especially open-bottom and closed-bottom wooden Langstroth hives, hives made of different materials, and the effect of hive type on the performance of honeybee colonies. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the performance of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.) housed in open-bottom and closed-bottom Langstroth wooden hives in the climatic conditions of Kurdistan province, Iran during 2019-2021.
 
Material and Methods: The present study was conducted in a completely randomized design with two treatments (the first treatment was open-bottomed Langstroth wooden hives, and the second treatment was closed-bottomed Langstroth wooden hives) and seven replications. In May 2019, a colony with a modified Iranian honey bee (Apis mellifera meda) queen was purchased from the Animal Science Research Institute of Iran, and 20 sister queens were raised from this hive in the climatic conditions of Sanandaj county, Kurdistan province. At the same time, seven open-bottomed Langstroth wooden colonies and seven closed-bottomed Langstroth wooden colonies were prepared for the introduction of reared queens. Four frames of bees (preferably frames containing larvae and pupae) were transferred from the supporting colonies into open and closed-bottom hives for the implementation of the project four days before the birth of virgin queens. Then, the hives were placed one meter apart inside the Gerizeh Research Station of the Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. One day before the queens were born, queen cells were removed from the studied hives, and then virgin queens were simultaneously introduced into open-bottom and closed-bottom hives. After 10 days and observing egg laying to ensure successful mating of the queens, the hives were simultaneously homogenized in terms of population (adults and brood) according to the instructions of Delaplane et al. (2013). The colonies were maintained in the pastures of the Kurdistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center until the following year, and then the studied traits were measured. In the present study, honey production, pollen collection, brood population, adult population, overwintering ability, and Varroa mite infestation traits were investigated in the studied colonies. In the present study, temperature and humidity inside the colonies were also measured during the project implementation.
 
Results and Discussion: The results of analysis of variance showed that the effect of treatment on the studied traits was significant (p<0.01) in the present study. The results of comparing the means based on Tukey's method at a probability level of 1% showed that the highest mean of honey production, pollen collection, overwintering performance, brood population, and adult population were related to open-bottomed Langstroth wooden hives, and the lowest of these traits were related to closed-bottomed Langstroth wooden hives. Also, the highest average Varroa mite infestation with an average of 165 mites was associated with closed-bottom Langstroth wooden hives, and the lowest with an average of 105 mites was associated with open-bottom Langstroth wooden hives.
 
Conclusion: Our findings show that the open-bottomed Langstroth wooden hives performed better than closed-bottomed Langstroth wooden colonies in terms of the traits studied in the present study. Therefore, considering the significant superiority of all studied traits in open-bottom Langstroth wooden hives, the use of open-bottom Langstroth wooden hives can be recommended to improve the functional traits of colonies and increase the productivity of apiaries in the climatic conditions of Kurdistan province and other neighboring provinces with similar climatic conditions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Apis mellifera meda
Functional traits
Hive type
Kurdistan
Langstroth

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  1. Abou-Shaara, H. )2014(. The foraging behavior of honeybees, Apis mellifera: A review. Veterinarni Medicina, 59, 1-10. https://doi.org /10.1016/C2021-0-00252-2
  2. Abou-Shaara, H. F., Al-Ghamdi, A. A., & Mohamed, A. A. (2013). Honey bee colonies performance enhance by newly modified beehives. Journal of Apiculture Science, 57(2), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2013-0016
  3. Al-Qarni, S. )2006(. Tolerance of summer temperature in imported and indigenous honeybee Apis mellifera L. races in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 13(2), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1315506111
  4. Akongte, P. N., Park, B. S., Kim, D. W., & Choi, Y. S. (2023). Honey Bee Colonies (Apis mellifera) Perform Orientation Defensiveness That Varies among Bred Lines. Insects, 14(6), 546. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/insects14060546
  5. Ataian, A. (2010). The use of open-bottom hive system and its advantages over common hives in the country. Iranian Honey Bee Science and Technology, 1(4), 21-28. (in Persian with English abstract)
  6. Amiri Ghanatsaman, Z., Tahmasebi, G. H., Agah, M. A., Hosseini, S. H., Bahrani, A. K., Karimi, H., Abarghuei, M. J., Hashemi, S. M., & Boostani, A. (2025). Investigation of temperature and humidity in honey bee colonies using different types of hives. In: Proceeding of 11ᵗʰ National and 3ʳᵈ International Animal Sciences Congress of Iran, 17-18 Septamber, Iran. pp. 2901-2904. (in Persian with English abstract)
  7. Amiri Ghanatsaman, Z. (2024). Comparison of colony performances of honeybee (Apis mellifera meda) housed in Longstrouth wooden, simple polystyrene and covered polystyrene hives. Final Report of the Research Project, the Animal Science Research Institute of Iran. 43 p. (in Persian with English abstract)
  8. Aishwarya, A., Srinivasan, M. R., Suganthi, S., & Krishnan, R. (2022). Suitability of hive wood type for italian honeybee (Apis mellifera). Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14(2a), 227-231.
  9. Bhatia, S., Rana, K., Thakur, M., Negi, N., Jit Singh, S., Dogra, A., Chauhan, O., & Monika, O. (2022). Impact of hive volume on colony performance in Apis mellifera ligustica colonies in sub temperate zone India. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(9), 23-29.
  10. Delaplane, K. S., Van der Steen, J., & Guzmán-Novoa, E. (2013). Standard methods for estimating strength parameters of Apis mellifera Journal of Apiculture Science, 52(1), 1-12. https://doi.org.10.3896/IBRA/1.52.1.03
  11. Dietemann, V., Nazzi, F., Martin, S. J., Anderson, D. L., Locke, B., Delaplane, K. S., Wauquiez, Q., Tannahill, , Frey, E., Ziegelmann, B., Rosenkranz, P., & Ellis, J. D. (2013). Standard methods for Varroa research. In: V. Dietemann, J. D. Ellis & P. Neumann, (Eds.) The Coloss Beebook, Volume II: Standard Methods For Apis mellifera Pest and Pathogen Research. Journal Apiculture Research, 52(3), 1-54. https://doi.org.10.3896/IBRA.1.52.4.16
  12. Erdogan, Y., Dodologlu, A., & Emsen, B. (2009). Some physiological characteristics of honeybee (Apis mellifera) housed in heated, fan wooden and insulated beehives. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(8), 934-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2019.1604088
  13. Islam, N., Amjad, M., Haq, E., & Naz, F. (2023). Comparative field efficiency of the extracts of plant materials for controlling Varroa destructor about brood development in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. International Journal Bioscience, 16(1), 126-138. https://doi.org/12692/ijb/16.1.126-138
  14. Karami, H., Sepehri, R., Tahmasebi, G. H., & Mollaei, M. (2025). Evaluation of the effect of a herbal compound based on plant essential oils and oxalic acid in controlling Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) in Iranian honeybee (Apis mellifera meda) colonies. Research Journal of Livestock Science, 148(38), 159-174. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/asj.2024.367618.2436
  15. Kutby, R., Baer-Imhoof, B., Robinson, S., Porter, L., & Baer, B. (2024). The effect of hive type on colony homeostasis and performance in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Insects, 15(10), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15100800
  16. Mcmenamin, A., Mumoki, F., Frazier, M., Kilonzo, J., Mweu, B., Baumgarten, T., Patch, H., Torto, B., Masiga, D., Tumlinson, J., Grozinger, C., & Muli, E. (2017). The impact of hive type on the behavior and health of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) in Kenya. Apidiligie, 48(1), 703-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-017-0515-5
  17. Rahimi, A., Tahmasebi, G., Bahmani, H. R., Salehi, S., Zare, B., Parsanaseb, A., & Rokhzad, B. (2023). Comparative evaluation of performance for improved Iranian honey bee queens (Apis mellifera meda Skorikov, 1929) in the climate conditions of Kurdistan province. Research on Animal Production, 39(14), 102-111. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.61186/rap.14.39.102 .
  18. Rahimi, A., & Parichehreh, S. (2024). Evaluation and introduction of a new plant-based formulation to control Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) in honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera). Journal of Entomological Society of Iran, 44(4), 417-428. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/ 61186/jesi.44.4.5
  19. Rahimi, A., Rashed, R., & Abdulla, B. (2025). Biological activity of some plant extracts on Varroa mite (Varroa destructor) and Iranian honey bee (Apis mellifera meda). Trends in Advanced Science and Technology. (In Press).
  20. Ramsey, S. D., Ochoa, R., Bauchan, G., Gulbronson, C., Mowery, J. D., Mowery, A., Lim, D., Joklik, J., Cicero, J. M., Ellis, J. D., Hawthorne, D., & vanEngelsdorp, D. (2019). Varroa destructor feeds primarily on honey bee fat body tissue and not hemolymph. PNAS Latest Articles, 16(5), 1792-1801. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818371116
  21. Rashid, B., Khani, A., Ghasemi, V., Ghadamyari, M., & Sahebzadeh, N. (2020). Evaluation of a new plant-based formulation for the treatment of varroosis in the honey bee colonies: Efficacy and safety. Apidologie, 51(6), 1074-1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-020-00786-x
  22. Sepehri, R., Tahmasebi, G. H., & Jalali Zanoz, M. J. (2007). Estimation of the number of sex alleles in the central Iranian honey bee population and its relationship with stored pollen, colony size, and honey production. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, 11(41), 321-331. (in Persian with English abstract)
  23. Taha, A. A. (2014). Effect of hive type on strength and activity rate of honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera) in Egypt. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 5(6), 773-784. https://doi.org/10.21608/jppp.2014.87990
  24. Tahmasebi, G. H., Babaei, M., Tajabadi, N., Seyfi, E., Mashayekhi, N., & Rezazadeh, H. (2018). The performance of improved honey bee colonies obtained from the thirteenth generation of Iranian queens and control colonies in different apiaries of Iran. Journal of Animal Production, 19(4), 739-750. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2018.235090.623198
  25. Traynor, K. (2007). German beekeeping institute open house - A glance into German beekeeping. American Bee Journal, 147(1), 37-40.
  26. Wueppenhorst, K.,Alkassab, A. K., Beims, H., Ulrich Ernst, U., Ingrid Illies, F., Janke, M., Kirchner, H. F., Seidel, K., Steinert, M., Yurkov, A., Erler, S., & Odemer, R. (2024). Honey bee colonies can buffer short-term stressor effects of pollen restriction and fungicide exposure on colony development and the microbiome. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 289, 116723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116723
  27. Yarahamdi, S., Mirai, S., Ashtiani, A., Ebadi, R., & Tahmasebi, G. (2001). Phenotypic correlation between nine morphological traits and three production traits in the population of honey bees in Tehran province. Agricultural Sciences and Techniques and Natural Resources, 5(2), 157-168. (In Persian).
  28. Zemene, M., Bogale, B., Derso, S., Belete, S., Melaku, S., & Hailu, H. (2015). A review on Varroa mites of honey Academic Journal of Entomology, 8(3), 150-159. https://doi.org.10.5829/idosi.aje.2015.8.3.95259
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 فروردین 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 06 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 06 اردیبهشت 1405