پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

اثرات جایگزینی یونجه با سطوح مختلف خارشتر بر قابلیت هضم و فراسنجه‏های شکمبه‏ای بره‏ های عربی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده دام و شیلات، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران
چکیده
پژوهشی به‏منظور بررسی اثرات جایگزینی یونجه خشک با سطوح مختلف خارشتر (Alhaji maurorum) بر قابلیت هضم، فراسنجه‏های تخمیر شکمبه‏ای، تولید پروتئین میکروبی و ریخت‏شناسی پرز‏های شکمبه بره­های نر پرواری نژاد عربی انجام شد. از تعداد 20 رأس بره با سن سه الی چهار ماه و میانگین وزن بدن 5/1±4/22 کیلوگرم به‏مدت 84 روز در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی در چهار تیمار آزمایشی با سطوح مختلف علوفه خشک خارشتر در مرحله دانه­دهی (صفر، 3/33، 6/66 و 100 درصد جایگزین علوفه یونجه) استفاده گردید. برای تعیین قابلیت هضم، از روش نشانگر داخلی خاکستر نامحلول در اسید استفاده شد. در انتهای دوره، جمع‏آوری مایع شکمبه، ادرار و نمونه‌گیری از دیواره شکمبه انجام گردید. قابلیت هضم ظاهری ماده خشک در تیمار 3/33 درصد جایگزینی خارشتر نسبت به تیمارهای 6/66 و 100 درصد جایگزینی خارشتر به‏طور معنی‏داری افزایش یافت. قابلیت هضم ظاهری الیاف نامحلول در شوینده اسیدی در تمامی سطوح جایگزینی علوفه خارشتر نسبت به گروه شاهد به‏طور معنی‏داری کاهش یافت. مقادیر کل اسیدهای چرب فرار، اسیداستیک، آلانتوئین ادرار، کل مشتقات پورینی دفع‏شده، تولید پروتئین میکروبی و تراکم پرزهای شکمبه در تمامی تیمارهای حاوی سطوح مختلف علوفه خارشتر نسبت به گروه شاهد به‏طور معنی‏داری بالاتر بود. ارتفاع پرزهای شکمبه در تیمارهای حاوی 6/66 و 100 درصد جایگزینی علوفه خارشتر نسبت به تیمارهای حاوی 33/3 درصد جایگزینی علوفه خارشتر و شاهد به‏طور معنی‏داری بیشتر بود. به‏طور کلی، جایگزینی بخشی از یونجه با خارشتر می‌تواند موجب بهبود برخی از شاخص‌های تخمیر شکمبه‌ای شود، هرچند سطوح بالای جایگزینی می‏تواند بر قابلیت هضم الیاف اثر منفی داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Effects of Replacing Alfalfa with Different Levels of Camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum) on Digestibility and Ruminal Parameters in Arabian Lambs

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Javad Khosravi
Yadollah Chashnidel
Asdollah Teymouri Yanesari
Radman Bakhtiari
Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Sciences and Fisheries, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction: The identification and utilization of regionally available feed resources are essential, particularly given the substantial influence of environmental and climatic factors on the quality and nutritional composition of forage crops. Under conditions of increasing water scarcity and the limited availability of conventional forages, the use of drought- and salinity-tolerant plant species such as camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum) has attracted growing interest. Camelthorn is considered a promising alternative forage owing to its relatively high concentration of digestible protein and a wide array of essential nutrients, contributing to its classification as a functional feed ingredient. Previous research has demonstrated that the partial substitution of traditional forages with camelthorn, particularly during their vegetative or flowering stages, does not adversely affect ruminal fermentation, nutrient digestibility, or overall animal performance. Although camelthorn hay is widely available in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran and has the potential to meet the nutritional demands of grazing livestock, its comprehensive nutritional profile remains insufficiently studied. Moreover, information regarding the use and nutritive value of halophytic plants in ruminant nutrition is generally scarce. Accordingly, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of replacing alfalfa hay with graded levels of camelthorn hay on apparent nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation characteristics, microbial protein synthesis, and ruminal papillae morphology in fattening lambs.
 
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted using 20 male Arabian lambs, aged 3-4 months, with an average initial body weight of 22.4 ± 1.5 kg. The study lasted 84 days, comprising a 14-day adaptation period followed by 70 days of experimental feeding. Lambs were individually housed and randomly assigned to one of four dietary groups in a completely randomized design, with five lambs per group. The experimental groups were as follows: 1) Control diet containing alfalfa hay without camelthorn hay; 2) diet with 33.3% replacement of alfalfa hay with camelthorn hay; 3) diet with 66.6% replacement of alfalfa hay with camelthorn hay; and 4) diet with 100% replacement of alfalfa hay with camelthorn hay. All diets were formulated using the Small Ruminant Nutrition System (SRNS) software and offered as total mixed rations (TMR) with a forage-to-concentrate ratio of 30:70, designed to meet the nutritional requirements of fattening lambs. Apparent nutrient digestibility was assessed using acid-insoluble ash as an internal marker. On day 84 of the study, rumen fluid samples were collected three hours after the morning feeding to analyze protozoal populations and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles. During the final week of the trial, urine was collected to estimate microbial protein synthesis using the purine derivatives excretion method. At the end of the trial, after slaughter, samples were taken from the rumen wall to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the rumen epithelium.
 
Results and Discussion: Apparent dry matter digestibility was significantly higher in the group receiving 33.3% replacement of alfalfa hay with camelthorn hay compared to the 66.6% and 100% replacement groups (P < 0.05). Apparent digestibility of acid detergent fiber (ADF) also differed significantly among groups (P < 0.05), with the highest value recorded in the control group (100% alfalfa; 45.67%) and the lowest in the 100% camelthorn group (32.63%). The apparent digestibility of non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) was significantly higher in the group receiving 33.3% replacement of alfalfa hay with camelthorn hay and control groups compared to the other experimental groups (P < 0.05). Total volatile fatty acid (VFA) and acetate proportionwere significantly elevated in all camelthorn-containing diets relative to the control (P < 0.05). Conversely, the molar proportion of ruminal propionate was significantly greater in the control and 33.3% replacement groups compared to the 66.6% and 100% camelthorn groups (P < 0.05). Protozoal populations in the rumen fluid were significantly higher in lambs fed the diets with 66.6% and 100% camelthorn substitution (P < 0.05). Furthermore, urinary excretion of allantoin, total purine derivatives, and estimated microbial protein synthesis were significantly increased in all camelthorn-supplemented groups compared to the control (P < 0.05). With respect to rumen morphology, papillae height was significantly greater in the 66.6% and 100% camelthorn groups than in the 33.3% and control groups (P < 0.05). Papillae density also significantly increased in all camelthorn groups relative to the control diet (P < 0.05).
 
Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that the graded substitution of alfalfa hay with camelthorn hay significantly influenced nutrient digestibility parameters, rumnial fermentation characteristics, and microbial protein synthesis in fattening lambs. Notably, the 33.3% replacement level preserved favorable digestibility while enhancing specific fermentation indices, suggesting it may be the optimal inclusion level. Given the increasing global demand for alfalfa, camelthorn offers a viable, cost-effective alternative forage in fattening lamb diets, warranting its consideration as a sustainable feed resource.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Camelthorn hay
Fermentation
Microbial protein
Rumen papillae
Volatile fatty acids

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  1. Abbasi Soltani, V., & Salamat Doost, R. (2013). Evaluation of the nutritional value of Alhagi maurorum and its role in ruminant nutrition phase I: Feasibility of ensiling Alhagi maurorum and comparison of its nutritional value with dried Alhagi and Dried alfalfa. National Congress of New Technologies in Animal Sciences, pp. 3-1. https://civilica.com/doc/1061865
  2. Aboagye, I. A., Oba, M., Koenig, K. M., Zhao, G. Y., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2019). Use of gallic acid and hydrolyzable tannins to reduce methane emission and nitrogen excretion in beef cattle fed a diet containing alfalfa silage. Journal of Animal Science97(5), 2230-2244. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz101
  3. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. 18th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  4. Asghari, M. H., Fallah, M., Moloudizargari, M., Mehdikhani, F., Sepehrnia, P., & Moradi, B. (2016). A systematic and mechanistic review on the phytopharmacological properties of AlhagiAncient Science of Life36(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.4103/asl.ASL_37_16
  5. Bashtini, J. (2015). Effect of camelthorn forage feeding on the performance of Baluchi sheep. Research Journal of Livestock Science28(106), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.22092/asj.2015.101358
  6. Beigh, Y. A., Ganai, A. M., Ahmad, H. A., Khan, H. M., & Mir, M. S. (2020). Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of Elm (Ulmus wallichiana) as browse for Bakerwal goats (Capra hircus). Agroforestry Systems94, 1367-1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0314-7
  7. Castillo, A. R., Kebreab, E., Beever, D. E., Barbi, J. H., Sutton, J. D., Kirby, H. C., & France, J. (2001). The effect of protein supplementation on nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows fed grass silage diets. Journal of Animal Science79(1), 247-253. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.791247x
  8. Chen, X. B., & Gomes, M. J. (1992). Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives: An overview of the technical details. International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute.
  9. Cheng, M., McCarl, B., & Fei, C. (2022). Climate change and livestock production: A literature review. Atmosphere13(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010140
  10. Collins, M., Nelson, C. J., Moore, K. J., & Barnes, R. F. (Eds.). (2017). Forages (Vol. 1): An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. 7th Wiley-Blackwell.
  11. Dehority, B. A. (2003). Rumen microbiology. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press, 372 pp.
  12. El Shaer, H. M. (2010). Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants as potential forage for ruminants in the Near East region. Small Ruminant Research91(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.01.010
  13. El Shaer, H. M., & Attia-Ismail, S. A. (2016). Halophytic and salt-tolerant feedstuffs in the Mediterranean Basin and Arab region: An overview. In H. M. El Shaer & V. R. Squires (Eds.), Halophytic and salt-tolerant feedstuffs: Impacts on nutrition, physiology and reproduction of livestock (pp. 21–36). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19862-4
  14. Francis, F. L. (2023). Feeding strategies to improve gastrointestinal health and growth performance of confinement-fed ruminants (PhD dissertation). Brookings, SD, USA: Department of Animal Science, South Dakota State University.
  15. Getachew, G., Ibáñez, A. M., Pittroff, W., Dandekar, A. M., McCaslin, M., Goyal, S., & Putnam, D. H. (2011). A comparative study between lignin down regulated alfalfa lines and their respective unmodified controls on the nutritional characteristics of hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology170(3-4), 192-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.009
  16. Ghavipanje, N., Hosseini, S. A., aghashahi, A., & Afshin, M. (2022). Comparison of chemical composition, gas production parameters and digestibility of Alhaji camelorum plant and alfalfa hay using nylon bag and gas production techniques. Journal of Animal Production, 24(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2022.336134.623665
  17. Górka, P., Kowalski, Z. M., Pietrzak, P., Kotunia, A., Jagusiak, W., Holst, J. J., & Zabielski, R. (2011). Effect of method of delivery of sodium butyrate on rumen development in newborn calves. Journal of Dairy Science94(11), 5578-5588. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4166
  18. Guo, C., Wu, Y., Li, S., Cao, Z., Wang, Y., Mao, J., & Xu, X. (2022). Effects of different forage types on rumen fermentation, microflora, and production performance in peak-lactation dairy cows. Fermentation8(10), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8100507
  19. Guo, W., Na, M., Liu, S., Li, K., Du, H., Zhang, J., & Na, R. (2024). Rumen-degradable starch improves rumen fermentation, function, and growth performance by altering bacteria and its metabolome in sheep fed alfalfa hay or silage. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI15(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15010034
  20. Haj Mohammadi, M., Tahmasbi, R., Dayani, O., & Khezri, A. (2019). Effect of feeding different levels of Ferula ovina on microbial protein and rumen parameters in Kermani sheep. Research Journal of Livestock Science32(123), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.22092/asj.2018.120791.1643
  21. Jayanegara, A., Goel, G., Makkar, H. P., & Becker, K. (2015). Divergence between purified hydrolysable and condensed tannin effects on methane emission, rumen fermentation and microbial population in vitroAnimal Feed Science and Technology209, 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.08.002
  22. Karamshahi Amjazi, K., Dayani, O., Tahmasbi, R., & Khezri, A. (2017). The effect of feeding Alhagi with waste date palm silage on dry matter intake, nutrients digestibility and blood parameters of sheep. Research in Animal Production8, 103-10. https://doi.org/10.29252/rap.8.16.103
  23. Kazemi, M., & Bezdi, K. G. (2021). An investigation of the nutritional value of camelthorn (Alhagi maurorum) at three growth stages and its substitution with part of the forage in Afshari ewes’ diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology271, 114762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114762
  24. Lesmeister, K. E., & Heinrichs, A. J. (2004). Effects of corn processing on growth characteristics, rumen development, and rumen parameters in neonatal dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science87(10), 3439-3450. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73479-7
  25. Liu, T., Li, F., Wang, W., Wang, X., Ma, Z., Li, C., & Zheng, C. (2022). Early feeding strategies in lambs affect rumen development and growth performance, with advantages persisting for two weeks after the transition to fattening diets. Frontiers in Veterinary Science9, 925649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.925649
  26. Makkar, H. P. (2003). Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Research49(3), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1
  27. Mokhtarpour, A., & Jahantigh, M. (2023). Feed intake, ruminal fermentation, blood metabolites and growth performance of lambs fed on camelthorn (Alhagi Camelorum ) based diets. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus88(2), 157-164. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-9063
  28. Mordeh Katani, A., Safari, R., Sheikhloo, M. R., & Nemati, Z. (2019). Gas production and biodegradability of four salinity plant species, Cobra, Halkennum, Salsula, and Kharshter under laboratory conditions. In Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Livestock, Poultry and Aquaculture Management. Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)
  29. Muhammad, G., Hussain, M. A., Anwar, F., Ashraf, M., & Gilani, A. H. (2015). Alhagi: A plant genus rich in bioactives for pharmaceuticals. Phytotherapy Research29(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5222
  30. Patra, A. K., & Saxena, J. (2011). Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture91(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4152
  31. Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Ranjbar, G. H., & Parnian, A. (2020). Forage resources in arid and saline environments of central Iran: Production potential and phenology of Alhagi maurorumJournal of Natural Resource Conservation and Management1(2), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.51396/ANRCM.1.2.2020.125-130
  32. Towhidi, A., Saberifar, T., & Dirandeh, E. (2011). Nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran. Tropical Animal Health and Production43, 617-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9741-9
  33. Vahidi, M. F., Gharechahi, J., Behmanesh, M., Ding, X. Z., Han, J. L., & Salekdeh, G. H. (2021). Diversity of microbes colonizing forages of varying lignocellulose properties in the sheep rumen. PeerJ, 9, e10463. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10463
  34. Van Keulen, J. Y. B. A., & Young, B. A. (1977). Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science44(2), 282-287. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x
  35. Van Soest, P. V., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  36. Wei, F., Yang, X., Pang, K., & Tang, H. (2021). Traditional uses, chemistry, pharmacology, toxicology and quality control of Alhagi sparsifolia Shap: A review. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, 761811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.761811
  37. Zaki, M. G., Baraka, T. A., Elkhiat, M. A., Younis, M. R., & Tayeb, F. A. E. F. (2024). The influence of season and sex on rumen fluid and hematobiochemical constituents of alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in Egypt. Comparative Clinical Pathology33(2), 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-024-03552-y
  38. Zhang, Z., Wei, W., Yang, S., Huang, Z., Li, C., Yu, X., & Zhang, X. (2022). Regulation of dietary protein solubility improves ruminal nitrogen metabolism in vitro: Role of bacteria–protozoa interactions. Nutrients14(14), 2972. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142972
  39. Zhou, J., Xue, B., Hu, A., Yue, S., Wu, M., Hong, Q., & Xue, B. (2022). Effect of dietary peNDF levels on digestibility and rumen fermentation, and microbial community in growing goats. Frontiers in Microbiology13, 950587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.950587
  40. Ziaei, N. (2010). The effect of dietary Alhagi (camel grass) ensiled with different levels of low-quality date pulm on apparent nutrient digestion coefficients in Kermani sheep. Research Journal Biological Science5, 314-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/rjbsci.2010.314.317

 

ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 05 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 12 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 01 دی 1404