پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

بررسی اثرات فراسودمند کاربرد پودر میلورم در جیره، بر صفات کمّی و کیفی تولید تخم‌مرغ، شاخص‌های خونی و پاسخ ایمنی مرغ‏های تخم‌گذار

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده علوم دامی و صنایع غذایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر به‏منظور بررسی سطوح مختلف پودر میلورم بر عملکرد و پاسخ ایمنی مرغ‌های تخم‌گذار انجام شد. این آزمایش به مدت هشت هفته با استفاده از 120 قطعه مرغ تخم‌گذار لگهورن سویه‌‌‌های-­لاین (W-80)، در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با چهار سطح پودر میلورم (صفر، یک، دو و سه درصد) با چهار تیمار، پنج تکرار و شش قطعه مرغ در هر تکرار اجرا گردید. جیره­ها برپایه ذرت-کنجاله سویا و با انرژی و پروتئین مشابه تهیه شد. نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از سطوح مختلف پودر میلورم باعث بهبود عملکرد مرغ‌های تخم‌گذار نسبت به شاهد شد. به‌طوری‌که مرغ‌های تغذیه‌شده با تیمار حاوی پودر میلورم نسبت به شاهد میزان توده تخم‏مرغ را افزایش داده و ضریب تبدیل غذایی را بهبود بخشید. شاخص­ کیفی زرده تخم‏مرغ به‏طور معنی‏داری تحت تأثیر تیمارهای آزمایشی قرار گرفت، گروه‏های تغذیه‌شده با یک و سه درصد پودر میلورم نسبت به سایر تیمارها دارای بیشترین درصد زرده بودند. در سرم خون مرغ‌های تغذیه‌شده با سطح یک درصد پودر میلورم نسبت به سایر گروه‏ها، میزان LDL به‏طور معنی‏داری کاهش یافت. سطح آلانین آمینو ترانسفراز با افزایش سطح پودر میلورم به‏طور معنی‏داری افزایش یافت. بالاترین عیار پادتن ثانویه علیه گلبول‏های قرمز گوسفندی در گروه‏های تغذیه‌شده با پودر میلورم مشاهده شد. به­طورکلی نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که استفاده از سطح یک درصد پودر میلورم علاوه‌بر بهبود ضریب تبدیل خوراک و شاخص بهره­وری تولید تخم­مرغ، صفات کیفی تخم‏مرغ، صفات خونی و پاسخ ایمنی را بهبود بخشید.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Study of the Extra-Beneficial Effects of using Mealworm Powder in the Diet on Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Egg Production, Blood Indices and Immune Response of Laying Hens

نویسندگان English

Mona Salamat
Ali Aghaei
Smayyeh Salari
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: The most important and widely used plant‑based protein sources in poultry nutrition are soybean meal, rapeseed meal, and canola meal. However, due to limited production and competition between humans and animals for the consumption of common protein sources, the prices of these items are increasing. Therefore, finding an alternative protein source is important (Tacon & Metian, 2008). Typically, animal‑derived protein sources contain all the essential amino acids required by poultry. Insects grow and reproduce rapidly and have a good feed conversion ratio because they are cold-blooded. They are also able to convert agricultural waste into valuable biomass with high levels of energy and protein (Collavo et al., 2005). Insects are also highly efficient protein sources, with nearly their entire biomass being edible. Mealworms are the larvae of a species of nocturnal beetle, Tenebrio molitor, from the family Tenebrionidae, found worldwide and are known as Mealworms because they are a pest of grains, flour, and stored food (Ramos et al., 2002). This larva is commercially reared worldwide and is available in live, canned, dried, and powdered forms as feed for pets, birds, and fish. The crude protein content of the dried powder of this larva is reported to be between 31 and 50 percent, crude fiber is 10 to 15 percent, ash is 3 to 5 percent, ether extract is 31 to 43 percent, and its gross energy is between 5890 and 6520 kcal/kg (Makkar et al., 2014). It has also been reported that the presence of chitin in these larvae, due to its prebiotic properties, can have beneficial effects on the consumer's immune system (Bovera et al., 2015). The nutritional composition of mealworms depends strongly on their developmental stage, diet, and environmental conditions (Siemianowaska et al., 2013). In general, considering the price of common protein sources and the possibility of less access to them in the future, the use of animal protein, including insects and their larvae, could be one of the proposed solutions (Huis et al., 2013).
Materials and Methods: An experiment was designed to investigate the effects of different dietary levels of mealworm powder on the performance and immune response of laying hens. This experiment was conducted at the Department of Animal Husbandry of Agricultural and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan. The experiment was conducted for 8 weeks (two weeks of adaptation and 6 weeks of data collection) using 120 Leghorn laying hens of the Hy‑Line W‑80 strain, in a completely randomized design with four levels of mealworm powder (0, 1, 2, and 3%) with 4 treatments, 5 replications, and 6 chickens per replication with corn-soybean based diets. Propagation, rearing, and preparation of mealworm larvae for use in diets were carried out at Sarzamin Salamat Company. Records were taken throughout the experiment. At the end of the experiment, blood and egg samples were collected for hematological, immunological, and egg quality analyses.
Results and Discussion: Chemical analysis of mealworm powder revealed 97% dry matter, 40% crude protein and 28% extract. The results showed that dietary inclusion of mealworm powder significantly improved the overall performance of laying hens compared with the control group during the experimental period. During weeks 1–2 of the experiment, performance was not affected by the experimental treatments. During weeks 3–4, feed conversion ratio decreased under the influence of mealworm consumption. During weeks 5–6, percentage production and egg mass increased under the influence of 1 and 2% mealworm consumption, and feed conversion ratio decreased with 1% mealworm consumption. Throughout the entire experimental period, chickens fed diets containing mealworm powder produced more egg mass and had better feed conversion ratios compared to the control group. The egg production efficiency index increased significantly with the inclusion of mealworm powder in the diet. Chickens fed with 1% of mealworm powder significantly reduced LDL levels compared to other groups. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity increased significantly with increasing mealworm powder levels. Glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, and aminotransferase enzyme were not affected by the experimental treatments. The highest secondary antibody titer against sheep red blood cells (SRBC) was observed in the groups fed diets containing mealworm powder.
Conclusion: Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate that dietary supplementation with 1% mealworm powder effectively improves feed conversion ratio, enhances the egg production efficiency index (EPEI), and positively influences egg quality, hematological parameters, and immune response in laying hens.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hy-line W80
Immune response
Liver enzyme
Perpormance

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

  1. Agunbiade, J. A., Adeyemi, O. A., Ashiru, O. M., Awojobi, H. A., Taiwo, A. A., Oke, D. B., & Adekunmisi, A. A. (2007). Replacement of fish meal with maggot meal in cassava-based layers' diets. The Journal of Poultry Science, 44(3), 278-282. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.44.278
  2. Alves, A. V., Sanjinez-Argandoña, E. J., Linzmeier, A. M., Cardoso, C. A. L., & Macedo, M. L. R. (2016). Food value of mealworm grown on Acrocomia aculeata pulp flour. Public Library of Science, 11(3), e0151275.‏ https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151275
  3. Amao, O. A., Oladunjoye, I. O., Togun, V. A., Olubajo, K., & Oyaniyi, O. (2010). Effect of westwood (Cirina forda) larva meal on the laying performance and egg characteristics of laying hen in a tropical environment. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9(5), 450-454.‏ https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.450.454
  4. AOAC International. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (Vol. 17, No. 1-2). AOAC International.‏
  5. Attia, Y. A., Abd Al-Hamid, A. E., Ibrahim, M. S., Al-Harthi, M. A., Bovera, F., & Elnaggar, A. S. (2014). Productive performance, biochemical and hematological traits of broiler chickens supplemented with propolis, bee pollen, and mannan oligosaccharides continuously or intermittently. Livestock Science, 164, 87-95.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.03.005
  6. Bahmani, M., Kazemi, R., & Donskaya, P. J. F. P. (2001). A comparative study of some hematological features in young reared sturgeons (Acipenser persicus and Huso huso). Fish physiology and Biochemistry, 24, 135-140.‏ https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011911019155
  7. Biasato, I., Gasco, L., De Marco, M., Renna, M., Rotolo, L., Dabbou, S. & Schiavone, A. (2018). Yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) inclusion in diets for male broiler chickens: effects on growth performance, gut morphology, and histological findings. Poultry science97(2), 540-548.‏ https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex308
  8. Bovera, F., Piccolo, G., Gasco, L., Marono, S., Loponte, R., Vassalotti, G., & Nizza, A. (2015). Yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor, L.) as a possible alternative to soybean meal in broiler diets. British Poultry Science, 56(5), 569-575.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1080815
  9. Çabuk, M., Alçiçek, A., Bozkurt, M., & İmre, N. (2003). Antimicrobial properties of the essential oils isolated from aromatic plants and using possibility as alternative feed additives. II. National Animal Nutrition Congress. 18-20 September, Konya, Turkey. pp. 184-187.
  10. Collavo, A. L. B. E. R. T. O., Glew, R. H., Huang, Y. S., Chuang, L. T., Bosse, R. E. B. E. C. C. A., & Paoletti, M. G. (2005). House cricket small-scale farming. Ecological Implications of Minilivestock: Potential of Insects, Rodents, Frogs and Snails, 27, 515-540.‏
  11. Costa, S. M. (2017). Proteínas de larvas de Tenebrio molitor (l., 1758): Extração, caracterização e aplicação num produto alimentar. MSc. Thesis, Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal).‏
  12. Dalle Zotte, A., Singh, Y., Michiels, J., & Cullere, M. (2019). Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as dietary source for laying quails: Live performance, and egg physico-chemical quality, sensory profile and storage stability. Animals, 9(3), 115.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030115
  13. Elahi, U., Wang, J., Ma, Y. B., Wu, S. G., Wu, J., Qi, G. H., & Zhang, H. J. (2020). Evaluation of yellow mealworm meal as a protein feedstuff in the diet of broiler chicks. Animals10(2), 224.‏https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020224
  14. Fakhraei, J., Loutfollahian, H., Shivazad, M., Chamani, M., & Hoseini, S. A. (2010). Reevaluation of lysine requirement based on performance responses in broiler breeder hens. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(16), 2137-2142.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.12.003
  15. Finke, M. D. (2002). Complete nutrient composition of commercially raised invertebrates used as food for insectivores. Zoo Biology: Published in Affiliation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, 21(3), 269-285.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.10031
  16. Finke, M. D. (2007). Estimate of chitin in raw whole insects. Zoo Biology: Published in Affiliation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, 26(2), 105-115.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20123
  17. Griminger, P., & Scanes, C. G. (1986). Protein Metabolism. In Avian Physiology. 326-344. New York, NY: Springer New York.‏
  18. Huis, A. V., Itterbeeck, J. V., Klunder, H., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., & Vantomme, P. (2013). Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 171, 1-201.
  19. Islam, M. M., & Yang, C. J. (2017). Efficacy of mealworm and super mealworm larvae probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics challenged orally with Salmonella and coli infection in broiler chicks. Poultry Science96(1), 27-34.‏ https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew220
  20. Jiang, T., Zhao, X., Li, H., Zhang, L., Tang, B., Ding, Y., & Wu., Y. (2024). Effects of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae meal on the growth performance, serum biochemical parameters and caecal metabolome in broiler chicke. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 23(1), 813-823. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2024.2350230
  21. Jin, X. H., Heo, P. S., Hong, J. S., Kim, N. J., & Kim, Y. Y. (2016). Supplementation of dried mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profiles in weaning pigs. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 29(7), 979.‏ https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0535
  22. Liu, S., Sun, J., Yu, L., Zhang, C., Bi, J., Zhu, F., & Yang, Q. (2012). Extraction and characterization of chitin from the beetle Holotrichia parallela Molecules, 17(4), 4604-4611.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17044604
  23. Lukanov, H., Atanas Genchev, A., & Todor Petrov, T. (2023). The Egg Production Efficiency Index (EPEI) as an economic indicator for measuring poultry egg production. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 29(4), 747–751.
  24. Lumeij, J. T. (1988). Avian Clinical Pathology: Some Experimental Findings of Importance to the Practitioner. In Proc. Association of Avian Veterinarians. 79-86.‏
  25. Lumej, J. T. (2008). Avian Clinical Biochemistry. In: JJ Kaneko, JW Harwey and ML Bruss (Eds). Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals. Oxford (UK): Elsevier Academic Press; p. 839–872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-370491-7.00030-1
  26. Makkar, H. P., Tran, G., Heuzé, V., & Ankers, P. (2014). State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 197, 1-33.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008
  27. Marono, S., Loponte, R., Lombardi, P., Vassalotti, G., Pero, M. E., Russo, F., Gasco, L., Parisi, G, Piccolo, G., Nizza, S., Di Meo, C., Attia, Y.A., & Bovera, F. (2017). Productive performance and blood profiles of laying hens fed Hermetia illucens larvae meal as total replacement of soybean meal from 24 to 45 weeks of age. Poultry Science, 96(6), 1783-1790.‏ https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew461
  28. Matson, K. D., Ricklefs, R. E., & Klasing, K. C. (2005). A hemolysis–hemagglutination assay for characterizing constitutive innate humoral immunity in wild and domestic birds. Developmental & Comparative Immunology, 29(3), 275-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2004.07.006
  29. Mohammadi, S., Torki, M., & Maryam Darbemamieh, M. (2025). Effects of mealworm-based synbiotics on productive performance, egg quality, blood metabolites, and gut health in laying Japanese quails. Food Science Nutrition, Nov 26, 13(12), e71281. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.71281
  30. National Research Council, Life Studies, & Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine. (2012). Nutrient Requirements of Swine.‏ R. Edition.
  31. Ramos-Elorduy, J., González, E. A., Hernández, A. R., & Pino, J. M. (2002). Use of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) to recycle organic wastes and as feed for broiler chickens. Journal of Economic Entomology, 95(1), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.214
  32. Ribeiro, N. T. G. M. (2017). Tenebrio molitor for Food or Feed: Rearing Conditions and the Effects of Pesticides on its Performance. Masters Thesis, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, 1-51.
  33. Schiavone, A., Cullere, M., De Marco, M., Meneguz, M., Biasato, I., Bergagna, S., & Dalle Zotte, A. (2017). Partial or total replacement of soybean oil by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) fat in broiler diets: Effect on growth performances, feed-choice, blood traits, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 16(1), 93-100.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2016.1249968
  34. Shariat Zadeh, Z., Kheiri, F., & Faghani, M. (2020). Productive performance, egg-related indices, blood profiles, and interferon-Ɣ gene expression of laying Japanese quails fed on Tenebrio molitor larva meal as a replacement for fish meal. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19(1), 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1722970
  35. Siemianowska, E., Kosewska, A., Aljewicz, M., Skibniewska, K. A., Polak-Juszczak, L., Jarocki, A., & Jedras, M. (2013). Larvae of mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) as European novel food.‏ Agricultural Sciences, 4(6), 287-291. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.46041
  36. Stastnik, O., Novotny, J., Roztocilova, A., Kouril, P., Kumbar, V., Cernik, J., Kalhotka, L., Pavlata, L., & Lacina, L. (2021). Safety of mealworm meal in layer diets and their influence on gut morphology. Animals, 11(5), 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051439
  37. Tacon, A. G., & Metian, M. (2008). Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture, 285(1-4), 146-158.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.015
  38. Ullah, R., Khan, S., Khan, N. A., Mobashar, M., Sultan, A., Ahmad, N., & Lohakare, J. (2017). Replacement of soybean meal with silkworm meal in the diets of white leghorn layers and effects on performance, apparent total tract digestibility, blood profile and egg quality. International Journal of Veterinary Health Science Research, 5(7), 200-207.‏ https://doi.org/10.19070/2332-2748-1700040
  39. Van Huis, A. (2013). Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology, 58(1), 563-583.‏ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704
  40. Veldkamp, T., Van Duinkerken, G., van Huis, A., Lakemond, C. M. M., Ottevanger, E., Bosch, G., & Van Boekel, T. (2012). Insects as a sustainable feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets: A feasibility study= Insecten als duurzame diervoedergrondstof in varkens-en pluimveevoeders: Een haalbaarheidsstudie (No. 638). Wageningen UR Livestock Research.‏
  41. Yang, Y. X., Guo, J., Yoon, S. Y., Jin, Z., Choi, J. Y., Piao, X. S., Kim, B. W., Ohh, S. J., Wang, M. H., & Chae, B. J. (2009). Early energy and protein reduction: Effects on growth, blood profiles and expression of genes related to protein and fat metabolism in broilers. British Poultry Science, 50(2), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660902736706
  42. Zang, Y. T., Bing, S., Zhang, Y. Z., Sheng, X. W., & Shu, D. Q. (2018). Effects of dietary supplementation with earthworm powder on production performance, blood characteristics, and heavy metal residues of broiler pullets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 27(4), 609-615.‏ https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfy024
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

  • تاریخ دریافت 09 تیر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 26 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 26 آذر 1404