تاثیر استفاده از مکمل‌های افزودنی‌ بر متابولیت‌های خون، جمعیت میکروبی، نشخوار و انتقال غیرفعال ایمیونوگلوبین‌ها در گوساله‌های هلشتاین

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- فیزیولوژی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه بیرجند

2 دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران

چکیده

در این پژوهش تاثیر افزودن مکمل­های افزودنی به شیر بر شاخص­های عملکردی، متابولیت­های خون، جمعیت میکروبی و انتقال غیرفعال ایمیونوگلوبین­ها به گوساله مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. شانزده راس گوساله ماده هلشتاین تازه متولد شده با میانگین وزن 5/41 در چهار گروه تیماری در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی به مدت 60 روز استفاده شد. تیمارها شامل: 1- گروه شاهد (شیر فاقد افزودنی) 2- گروه پروبیوتیک (شیر + دو گرم پروبیوتیک) 3- گروه پری­بیوتیک (شیر + چهار گرم پری­بیوتیک) 4- گروه سین بیوتیک (شیر + دو گرم پروبیوتیک چهار گرم پری­بیوتیک) بود. گوساله­های تغذیه شده با جیره دارای مکمل پروبیوتیک (گروه 2)کمترین مصرف خوراک و بهترین ضریب تبدیل غذایی را درکل دوره نسبت به سایر تیمارها داشتند. غلظت کلسترول کل، غلظت پروتئین کل پلاسما و آلیومین پلاسما تحت تاثیر مکمل­های پروبیوتیکی و پری­بیوتیکی در جیره ها قرار نگرفت و هیچ گونه اختلاف معنی­داری بین جیره­ها مشاهده نشد. مصرف مکمل پروبیوتیک باعث کاهش معنی­داری (05/0P<) غلظت تری­گلیسیریدها در پلاسمای خون، گوساله­های تغذیه شده با مکملهای افزودنی شد. بیشترین غلظت تری­گلیسرید مربوط به گروه شاهد بود که اختلاف معنی­داری (05/0P<) با سایر گروه­ها داشت. کمترین غلظت بتا هیدروکسی بوتیرات مربوط به گروه شاهد بود که اختلاف معنی‌داری (05/0P<) با سایر گروه­ها داشت. در گوساله­های مصرف­کننده پروبیوتیک مقدار جمعیت کل باکتریها به میزان اندک بعد از خوراک دهی افزایش یافت ولی هیچ­گونه اختلاف­معنی­داری در سنین مختلف در بین گروه­های دریافت­کننده مکمل مشاهده نشد. بیشترین مقدار ایمیونوگلوبولینG مربوط به گروهی بود که پروبیوتیک مصرف کرده بودند و با گروه­های شاهد و گروه سین­بیوتیک اختلاف معنی­داری(05/0>P) داشت ولی ازگروه پری­بیوتیک بیشتر بود و این روند در همه سنین 3، 7 و 30 روزگی ادامه داشت. در مجموع، نتایج حاکی از آن است که افزودن مکمل­های پروبیوتیکی در جیره باعث بهبود عملکرد گوساله­های شیری هلشتاین می­شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Additive Supplementation on Blood Metabolites, Microbial Population, Ruminants and Inactive Transmission of Immunoglobulins in Holstein Calf

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masood Didarkhah 1
  • Moosa Vatandoost 2
1 Department of Agriculture, University of Birjand
2 Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

Introduction In ruminant animals, the microbial population of the digestive tract can be controlled by several factors such as growth promoters, probiotics, periobacters, enzymes, essential oils, oligosaccharides and plant additives. Before weaning, dairy calves are susceptible to many pathogens and nutritional problems. For several years antibiotics have been used to overcome these problems also to obtain economic benefits in terms of improved calves performance and reduced medication costs. However, the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry is in question because of antibiotic resistance of microorganisms. Research shows an association between the use of sub-therapeutic dose of antibiotics and antibiotic-resistance organisms. Probiotics are live microbial feed supplements which beneficially affect the host animal by improving its microbial balance. Most of probiotic studies that were reported in the literatures used single or two strains probitics rather that multi strains bacteria, Prebiotics are non-digestible carbohydrates which are not metabolized in the small intestine and fermented in large intestine. reported that dietary chitosan oligosaccharides supplementation was effective in increasing the ileal digestibilities of nutrients and feed efficiency in broilers. Also reported that broilers fed diet supplemented with oligochitosan prebiotic had higher serum IgG, IgM and IgA concentration compared with broiler fed control diet. Dietary supplementation with Chinese herbal ultra-fine 3 powder as a prebiotic enhances cellular and humoral immunity in early weaned piglets. In this study, the effect of adding supplements to milk on functional parameters, blood metabolites, microbial population and inactivation of immunoglobulins to calves were investigated.
Materials and methods Sixteen newly-born Holstein male calves were used in four completely randomized treatments for 60 days.Treatments included: 1- control group (no additive milk) 2- probiotic group (milk + 2 gr probiotic) 3- prebiotic group (milk + 4 gr perbiotic) 4- synbiotic group (milk + 2 gr probiotic and 4 gr perbiotic). Calves were weighed at 3, 30 and 63 days of age after feeding the milk at the morning meal, and the feed intake was measured and recorded daily from day 10 to the end of the period for each calf. On the 14, 30 and 63 days samples of all calves were taken from the feces for microbial culture. Blood samples were taken at nine o'clock in the morning (two hours after the morning meal) on weekdays. To measure the concentration of metabolites, plasma samples were melting at room temperature to determine the serum levels of serum cholesterol, glucose, albumin, triglyceride and total protein plasma from a biosorbent kit and an autoanalyzer (model A15, France) with two replications measured. IgG concentrations were measured by immunoturbidimetry method using the COBAS INTEGRA kit at a wavelength of 800-400 nm On the fourth day of the course, the total activity was measured for 24 hours by direct observation (28 and 51). The duration of rumination and eating was considered as the duration of maturation, and the activity of rumination and eating every five minutes was recorded for 24 hours. The duration of rumination and eating from the product of the number of each observation was obtained at intervals of five minutes.
Results and discussion In calves fed with a diet containing probiotic supplementThe lowest feed intake and the best feed conversion ratio were observed in all periods compared to other treatments.Glucose and Triglyceride, total cholesterol concentration, total plasma protein and plasma aliquin concentrations were not affected by probiotic and peri-biotic supplements in diets and no significant differences were found between diets. Probiotic supplementation significantly reduced the concentration of triglycerides in the blood plasma of calves fed with supplement supplements (P <0.05). The highest concentration of triglyceride was in the control group, with a significant difference (P <0.05) with other groups. The lowest concentration of beta-hydroxybutyrate was in the control group, with a significant difference (P <0.05) with other groups.In the calf Fed with probioticThe total amount of bacteria increased slightly after feeding, but there was no significant difference between different age groups in the complementary recipient groups. The highest IgG levels were in the group that consumed probiotics and there was a significant difference between the control group and the synbiotic group (P <0.05), but it was only numerically higher than the prebiotic group and this trend All ages 3, 7 and 30 continued. 
Conclusion In general, the results showed that supplementation with probiotic additive could improve the livestock's economic indices.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Additive supplement
  • calves
  • Immunoglobulins
  • Microbial population
  • Rminants
1- Abe, F., N. Ishibashi and S. Shimamura. 1995. Effect of administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets. Journal of Dairy Science, 78: 2838-2846.
2- Afshar Mazandaran, N.V. and A. Rajab. 2002. Probiotics and their application in feeding livestock and poultry. Nourbakhsh Publication.(In Persian).
3- Alberda, C., L., Gromlish, J., Meddings, C. Field,and L, McCargar. 2007. Effects of probiotic therapy in critically ill patients: A randomized double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 85: 816-823.
4- Aldana, C., S. Cabra, A. Carlos, F. Carvajal and F. Rodriguez. 2009. Effect of probiotic compound in rumen development, diarrhea incidence and weight gain in young Holstein calves. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 33 pp.
5- Al-Saidy, M.Y. 2010. Effect of bacteria on immunoglobulin G concentration and other blood components of newborn calves. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 9: 604-609.
6- Azimzadeh, A., A. Asadi al-Mutati, A. Akbar Khadem and J. Mohammad Moradi. 2015. Effects of feeding a synbiotic additive on the growth and health performance of Holstein calves. Animal production research. Sixth year Number, 12:113-105. (In Persian).
7- Baron, E.J. and S.M. Finegold. 1990. Diagnostic Microbiology. 8thed. the CV. Mosby Company. Torento, Canada.
8- Bayat Koharsar, J., A. Tahmasebi, A. Nasserian and M.R. Rezaei. 2014. Effect of using probiotic produced in laboratory on the performance of infant calves. 6th Iranian Congress of Animal Sciences. Tabriz University, (In Persian).
9- Bomba, A., Nemcova, R., Mudronova, D. and Guba, P. 2002. The possibilities of potentiating the fficacy of probiotics. Trends in Food Science. Tech. 13: 121-126.
10- Brakefield, K., Godden, S., Fetrow, J., Rapnicki, P., Jones, C., Bey, R. and Haines, D. 2010. Effect of feeding Bovamine® probiotic on passive transfer of immunoglobulin G in newborn calves. Proceeding of Minnesota Dairy Health Conference, University of Minnesota, USA, Pp: 103-104.
11- Chimwano, A.M., E.R. Orskov and C.S. Stewart. 1976. Effect of dietary proportions of roughage and concentrate on rate of dried grass disappearance in the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 35(2): 101A-102A.
12- Cruywagen, C.W., I. Jordaan and L. Venter. 1996. Effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation of milk replacer on preweaning performance of calves. Journal of Dairy Science. 79: 483486.
13- Darreh Zarashkipour, M., Kh. Parsaei Mehr, F. Hossein Zadeh and P. Farhomand. 2013. The effect of different levels of prebiotic supplementation (E-max) on digestibility and some biochemical parameters of serum of West Azarbaijan native pups. Veterinary Clinic Pathology. Volume 7, Number 4, Thousands. 2. Page 321-314, (In Persian).
14- Deka, R.S. 2009. Effect of probiotic Biobloom as growth promoter in kids. Indian Veterinary, 86(11): 1192-1193.
15- Dvorak, R.A., K.A. Jacques and K.E. Newman. 1998. Mannanoligosaccharide, fructooligosaccharide and Carbadox for pigs 0-21 dayspost-weaning. Journal of Animal Science, 76(Suppl. 2): 64.
16- El-Hassan, S.M., C.J., New bold, and I.E, Edwards. 1996. Effect of yeast culture on rumen fermentation, microbial protein flow the rumen and live weight gain in bulls given high concentrate diets. Animal Production Science. 62:43-48.
17- Elizondo-Salazar, J.A. and A.J, Heinrichs. 2009. Feeding heat-treated colostrum to neonatal dairy Heifers; effect on growth characteristics and blood parameters. Journal of Dairy Science. 92: 3265-3273.
18- Enjalbert, F., J.E. Garrett, R. Moncoulon, C. Bajourthe and P. Chicoteau. 1999. Effects of yeast culture (saccharomyces cerevisiae) on ruminal digestion in non-lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Tech, 183: 140-151.
19- Fowler, J., R. Kakani, A. Haq, Ja. Byrd and Ca. Bailey. 2015. Growth promoting effects of prebiotic yeast cell wall products in starter broilers under an immune stress and clostridium perfringens challenge. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 24: 66-72.
20- Frizzo, L.S., M.V. Zbruna, L.P. Sotoa and M.L. Signorinib. 2011. Effects of probiotics on growth performance in young calves: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Animal Feed Science and Technology 169, 147–156.
21- Fujiwara, K., M. Yamazaki, H. Abe, K. Nakashima, Y. Yakabe, M. Otsuka, Y. Ohbayashi, Y. Kato, K. Namai, A. Toyoda, Y. Miyaguchi and Y. Nakamura. 2009: Effect of Bacillus subtilis var. natto fermented soybean on growth performance, microbial activity in the caeca and cytokine gene expression of domestic meat type chickens. The Journal of Poultry Science, 46: 116-122.
22- Fuller, R. 1977. The importance of lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in the crop. British Poultry Science, 18: 85-94.
23- Fuller, R. 1992. Probiotics: the scientific basis chapman and Hall.London.pp:1-20Galip N, 2006. Effects ofdietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae live Yeast culture supplementation on ruminal digestion and protozoa count in rams fed with diets with or high ratio forage / concentrate.Faculty of veterinarymedicine.16059 bursa /Turkey, 157(12): 609-613.
24- Galvao, K.N., J.E. Santos, A. Coscioni, M. Villasenor, W.M. Sischo and A.C. Berge. 2005. Effect of feeding live yeast products to calves with failure of passive transfer on performance and patterns of antibiotic resistance in fecal Echerchia coli. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 45: 427-440.
25- Gibson, G.R. 2004. Fibre and effects on probiotics (the prebiotic concept). Clinical Nutrition Supplements, 1(2): 25-31.
26- Gibson, G.R. and M.B. Roberfroid. 1995. Dietary modulation of the human colonicmicrobia: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal of Nutrition, 125: 1401-1412.
27- Girard, I.D. 1995. Stimulation of ruminal bacteria by difference fractions derived from culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain 1026. J. Anim. Sci. 73: (Supp1.1): 264 (Abstr).
28- Heinrichs, A.J., C.M. Jones and B.S. Heinrichs. 2003. Effects of mannan oligosaccharide or antibiotics in neonatal diets on health and growth of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science. 86:4064.
29- Heydari Khormizy, S., R, Dehghan, M, Benadiki, K. Researcher and A. Zali. 2007. Study of the effect of probiotic and fungal probiotics on production performance of Holstein cattle in early lactation. Master's thesis, University of Tehran, (In Persian).
30- Hood S, Zoitola. E-.1988. Effect of low pH on the ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus to survive and adhere to human intestinal cells. Journal of Food Science. 53(5): 1514-1520.
31- Hossain, S.A., S. Parnerkar, N. Haque, R.S. Gupta, D. Kumar and A.K. Tyagi. 2012. Influence of dietary supplementation of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on nutrient utilization ruminal and biochemical profiles of Kankrej calves. Int. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 1(1): 30-38.
32- Hossein Abadi, M., M. Dehghan Banadaki and A. Zali. 2013. Effect of adding probiotic bacteria in milk or initial feed on growth performance, health condition, blood and stomatal parameters of Holstein calves. Animal production research. forth year. Number, 8: 69-57 (In Persian).
33- Houdijk, J.G.M., M.W. Bosch, S. Tamminga, M.W.A. Verstegen and E.B. Berenpas. 1999. Apparent ileal and total-tract nutrient digestion by pigs as affected by dietary non-digestible oligosaccharides. Journal of Animal Science, 77: 148-158.
34- James, R.E., C.E., Polan., and K.A., Cummins. 1981. Influence of administered indigenous microorganisms on uptake of [Iodine-125] {gamma}-globulin in vivo by intestinal segments of neonatal calves. Journal Dairy Science. 64: 52-61.
35- Jin, M., H., Shao. Z., Jiang, F., Jin. T., Chen and J., Wang. 2012. A eliable immunoturbidimetry method for immunoglobulin G in bovine colostrum. Food Agri.Immun. 23: 133-144.
36- Kaske, M. and W. Von Engelhrdt. 1990. The Effects of size and density on mean retention time of particles in the gastrointestinal tract of sheep. Britesh. Journal Nutrion. 63:457.
37- Kogan, G. and A. Kocher. 2007. Role of yeast cell wall polysaccharides in pig nutrition and health protection. Livest Science, 109-165.
38- Krehbiel, C.R., S.R. Rust, G. Zhang and S.E. Gilliland. 2003. Bacterial direct-fed microbials in ruminant diets: Performanceresponse and mode of action. Journal of Animal Science, 81: E120-E132.
39- Kritas, S.K. and R.B. Morrison. 2005. Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. The Veterinary Record, 156: 447-448.
40- Mainardi, S.R., B.A. Hengst, S.G. Nebzydoski, L.M. Nemec and T.F. Gressly. 2012. Effects of obomasal oligofroctose on blood and feces of Holstein steers. Department of Animal and Food science, 45: 155-161.
41- Mertens, D. R. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 80: 1463-1481.
42- Mohamadi, P. and N. Dabiri. 2012. Effects of probiotic and prebiotic on average daily gain, fecal shedding of Escherichia Coli, and immune system status in newborn female calves. Asian-Aust. Journal of Animal Sciences. 25: 1255-1261.
43- Morrison, S.J., S. Dawson and A.F. Carson. 2010. The effects of mannan oligosaccharide and Streptococcus faecium addition to milk replacer on calf health and performance. Livestock Science, 131: 292-296.
44- Nakanishi, Y., C.W. Arave and P.H. Stewart. 1993. Effect of feeding Lactobacillus acidophilus yogurt on performance and behavior of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science, 76(Suppl.1): 244 pp.
45- Nisbet, D.J. and S.A Martin. 1991. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Journal of Animal Sciences 69:4628-4633
46- Novak, K.N., E. Davis, C.A. Wehnes, D.R. Shields, J.A. Coalson, A.H. Smith and T.G. Rehberger. 2012. Effect of supplementation with an electrolyte containing a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial on immune development in dairy calves. Research in Veterinary Science, 92: 427-434.
47- Pieper, R., P. Janczyk, V. Urubschurov, U. Korn, B. Pieper and W.B. Souffrant. 2009. Effect of a single oral administration of Lactobacillus plantarum DSMZ 8862/8866 before and at the time point of weaning on intestinal microbial communities in piglets. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 130: 227-232.
48- Piras, C. and S. Bovolenta. 1995. The use of brewer's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for weaning calves. Zootecnica e Nutrizione Animale, 21: 57-61.
49- Piva, G., S. Belladonna, G. Fusconi & F. Sicoaldi. 1993. Effects of yeast on dairy cow performance, ruminal fermentation, blood composition and milk manufacturing properties. Journal of Dairy Science . 76:2717-2722.
50- Rameshwar S., L.C. Chaudhary, D.N. Kamra and N.N. Pathak. 1998. Effect of dietary supplementation with yeast cell suspension (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on nutrient utilisation and growth response in crossbred calves. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 11: 268-271.
51- Riddell, J.B., A.J. Gallegos, D.L. Harmon and K.R. Mcleod. 2010. Addition of a Bacillus based probiotic to the diet of pre ruminant calves: influence on growth, health and blood parameters. Intern. Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, 8: 78-85.
52- Sami, N., Salminen, S., Bylund, G. and Ouwehand, A. 2001. Characterization of properties of human- and Dairy-derived probiotic for prevention of infectious disease in fish. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 2430-2435.
53- Santoso, B., B. Mwenya, C. Sar, Y. Gamo, T. Kobayashi and R. Morikawa. 2004. Effects of supplementing galacto-oligosaccharids, Yucca schidigra or nisin on rumen metanogenesis, nitrogen and energy metabolism in sheep. Livestock Production Science, 91: 209-217.
54- SAS, Institute. 2003. SAS User‘s Guide. Version 9.1 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
55- Savage, D.C. 1987. Microorganisms associated with epithelial surfaces and the stability of the indigenous gastrointestinal microflora. Die Nahrung. 5-6:383-390.
56- Taylor, D.J. 2001. Effects of antimicrobials and their alternative. British Journal of Poultry Science, 42: 67.
57- Timmerman, H.M., L. Mulder, H. Everts, D.C. van Espen, E. van der Wal, G. Klaassen, S.M.G. Rouwers, R.F. Hartemink, M. Rombouts and A.C. Beynen. 2005. Health and growth of veal calves fed milk replacers with or without probiotics Journal of Dairy Science, 88: 2154-2165.
58- Vakili-Saleh, F., Moslemipur, F., Mostafaloo, Y. and Ghorbani, R. 2012. Study of effects of heating and antibiotic addition to colostrum on passive transfer of immunoglubolins, growth and health parameters in calves. M.Sc. thesis, University of Gonbad Kavoos. (In Persian)
59- Zhang ,R., M. Zhou, Y. Tu, N. F. Zhang., Close author notes K. D. Deng, T. Ma,. Close author notes Q. Y. Diao. 2015. Effect of oral administration of probiotics on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility and stress-related indicators in Holstein calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 100: 33–38.