اثرات مخلوط تفاله‌های انار، انگور، سیب و لیموترش با و بدون آنزیم بر عملکرد، صفات لاشه، پاسخ ایمنی و مورفولوژی روده جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- تغذیه طیور

نویسندگان

1 آزاد اسلامی واحد مراغه

2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی- واحد مراغه

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر به‌منظور ارزیابی اثرات استفاده از سطوح مختلف مخلوط تفاله‌های انار، انگور، سیب و لیموترش با و بدون آنزیم بر عملکرد، صفات لاشه، پاسخ ایمنی و مورفولوژی روده در جوجه‌های گوشتی انجام گرفت. این آزمایش با تعداد 384 قطعه جوجه گوشتی (سویه راس- 308)، در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی با آرایش فاکتوریل (2×4) با چهار سطح مخلوط تفاله‌ها (صفر، 2، 4 و 6 درصد)، دو سطح مولتی‌‌آنزیم روابیو (صفر و 05/0 درصد) در 8 تیمار، 4 تکرار و 12 قطعه جوجه در هر تکرار، از سن 10 تا 42 روزگی در دو مرحله رشد (11 تا 24 روزگی) و پایانی (25 تا 42 روزگی) انجام گرفت. استفاده از 6 درصد مخلوط تفاله‌ها و 6 درصد تفاله‌ها با مولتی‌‌آنزیم بدون تأثیر بر ضریب تبدیل خوراک، درصد ماندگاری و هزینه تولید، موجب افزایش مقدار خوراک مصرفی، افزایش وزن روزانه، افزایش وزن نهایی جوجه‌‌‌ها و شاخص تولید شد. 6 درصد مخلوط تفاله‌‌ها موجب افزایش معنی‌‌دار درصد سنگدان شد. استفاده از مخلوط تفاله‌‌ها سطح ایمنوگلوبین G را کاهش داد ولی مولتی‌‌آنزیم و مولتی‌‌‌آنزیم با مخلوط تفاله‌‌ها اثرات معنی‌‌داری بر وضعیت ایمنی جوجه‌‌ها نداشت. مخلوط تفاله‌‌ها، مولتی‌‌آنزیم و مخلوط تفاله‌‌ها با مولتی‌‌آنزیم اثرات معنی‌‌داری بر مورفولوژی روده جوجه‌‌ها نداشت. درمجموع استفاده از 6 درصد مخلوط تفاله‌‌های انار، انگور، سیب و لیموترش در جیره جوجه‌‌های گوشتی نه‌تنها اثرات منفی بر عملکرد آن‌ها نداشت، بلکه افزایش وزن روزانه، وزن نهایی جوجه‌‌ها و شاخص تولید را نیز بهبود بخشید. درحالی‌که استفاده از مولتی‌‌‌آنزیم نتوانست کارآیی استفاده از تفاله‌ها را بهبود دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effects of Pomegranate, Grape, Apple and Lemon Pulps Mixture with and without Multi-Enzyme on Performance, Carcass Traits, Immune Response and Intestinal Morphology of Broilers

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ashkan Sedighi 1
  • Ali Nobakht 2
1 Islamic Azad University of maraghh Branch
2 Iy maragheh branch
چکیده [English]

Introduction[1]:  The agro-industrial processing was resulted some wastes as vegetable and fruit by-products. The fruit byproducts use as energy sources in animal feed and using of these by-products are economically and environmentally sound way for food processors to reduce waste discharges and cut waste management cost. Selling by-products can also produce additional revenue. The poor state of economy in developing countries has made consumption of high protein foods out of reach of more than 65-70% of the people. One of the ways of solving this problem is use unconventional sources of feed ingredients to supplement the diets of man and farm animals. Fruit pulps are some of these unconventional feedstuffs. Pulps contain some of essential nutrients and secondary substances those can be use as feed ingredients in poultry diets. As pulps contain highly amount of undesirable compounds such as crude fiber and pectin, that poultry digestive tract cannot tolerate highly amount of them, imagine that adding effective feed enzyme can be solve this problem. In the current study the effects of different levels of pomegranate, grape, apple and lemon pulps mixture with and without multi-enzyme on performance, carcass traits, immune response and intestinal morphology of broilers was evaluated.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted with 384 Ross- 308 broilers in a completely randomized design as factorial arrangement (4*2) with 4 levels of pulps mixture (0, 2, 4, 6%) and 2 levels of Rovabio multi-enzyme (0, 0.05%) in 8 treatments, 4 replicates and 12 chicken in per replicate from 10 up 42 days in grower (11-24 days) and finisher (25-42 days).
Results and Discussion: Using 6% of pulps mixture and 6% of pulps mixture with 0.05% of multi- enzyme without having any significant effects on feed conversion ratio, livability and feed cost, increased the amounts of feed intake, weight gain, final live weight and production index (P<0.05). Using 6% pulps mixture significantly increased the percentage of gizzard (P<0.05). Multi- enzyme and pulps mixtures with multi-enzyme had not affect the carcass traits of broilers (P>0.05). By using pulps mixture, the level of IgG decreased (P<0.05) but pulps mixture with multi-enzyme had not significantly affect the immune level of broilers (P>0.05). Pulps mixture and multi-enzyme had not any significant effects on intestinal morphology of broilers (P>0.05). Increase in the amount of daily feed intake by using 6% of pulps mixture may be related to high amount of diet fiber. Fiber increase the speed of feed passing through digestive tract, by this way the amount of feed intake increased. By increasing the amount of feed intake, the amount of nutrient supplying increased and the amount of daily weight gain improved. As improving of weight gain was obtained by feeding highly amount of feed intake, for this reason feed conversion ratio not significantly improved. Improve of final weight and production index by using 6% of pulps mixture may be related to highly amount of daily weight gain. Increase of gizzard percentage maybe related to the amount of diet fiber. As fiber increased the volume of diet, it can increase the gizzard size. Pulps contain some active antioxidant compounds such as flavonoids, isoflavones, flavones, anthocyanins, coumarins. It thought that these compounds can increase the immune level of chickens, but this condition in the current study not occurred. It can be have some reasons such as kinds and levels of pulps in mixture, the quality and processing of pulps, the health status of broilers and diets ingredients. Pulps contains some actives that these actives can change the intestinal morphology, but this change not occurred in the current study, it may be related to the amount of each pulp in pulps mixture, length of experiment period and experiment starting time. Adding enzyme to the diets did not have any significant effects on performance and other parameters of broilers. It can have some reasons such as the amount and composition of multi-enzyme, quality of multi-enzyme, mixing time of diets, diets other ingredients and bird health.
Conclusion: The overall results of the present study showed that in broiler chickens using 6% pomegranate, grape, apple and lemon pulps mixture without having any significant effects on intestinal morphology, can improve their performance, final live weight and production index. Using multi-enzyme could not improve the efficacy of pulps mixtures in broiler diets.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broilers
  • Enzyme
  • Immune level
  • Performance
  • Pulps mixture
. AbDel-Momeim, M. A., G.A. Hamady, and H.F.A. Motawe. 2014. The use of orange waste with and without enzymes in broilers' diets and its effect on their performance, carcass traits and some blood parameters. Journal of Animal, Veterinary and Fishery Sciences, 2 (12): 14-19.
2. Agu, P.N., O.I.A. Oluremi, and C.D. Tuleun. 2010. Nutritional evaluation of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) fruit peel as feed resource in broiler production. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 684-688.
3. Ahmad, G.A. 2004. Simultaneous use of apple pomace and molasses as a source of energy for broiler. Indian Journal of Poultry Science, 39 (2): 179-181.
4. AOAC. 2002. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of official analytical. Eds. Washington DC.
5. Bradley, G. L., T.F. Savagem, and K.I. Timm. 1994. The effects of supplementing diets with Saccharomyces cervisiae var. boulardi on male poultry performance and ileal morphology. Poultry Science, 73: 1766-1770.
6. Dorri, S., S. Tabeidian, M. Toghyani, R. Jananian, and F. Behnamnejad. 2012. Effect of different levels of grape pomace on broiler chicks. The 1th international and the 4th national congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 26 - 27 April in Isfahan, Iran.
7. Eskandari, M. and A. Nobakht. 2016. The effect of different levels of lemon pulp and enzyme on performance, carcass traits, immune status and intestinal morphology of broilers. Animal Science Journal (Pajouheh and Sazandeghi). 110: 129-142.
8. Fanimo, A..O., O.O. Oduguwa Alade, T.O. Ogunnaike, and A.K. Adesehinwa. 2003. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass characteristic of growing rabbits fed cashew apple waste. Livestock Research and Rural Development, 15 (8): 15-23.
9. Farkhoy, M., F. Sigharody, and F. Niknafas. 1994. Poultry breeding. Second Edition. Coasar Publication. pp: 150-266
10. Ghaemi, H., A. Nobakht, and S. Razzagzadeh. 2014. The effect of apple pulp and multi enzyme on performance and blood parameters in native laying hens. Journal of Farm Animals Nutrition and Physiology, 9/1: 10-21.
11. Golmohammadi, Y. and A. Nobakht. 2016. The effect of lemon pulp and organic acids on performance, intestinal morphologhy and blood parameters of broilers. Animal Production Journal, 18 (1): 129-140.
12. Gonzalez-Alvarado, J. M. E. Jimenez-Moreno, and D. Gonzalez-Sanchez. 2010. Effect of inclusion of oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 162:37-46.
13. Grasman K. A. 2010. In vivo functional test for assessing in birds (Ed.), Immune toxicity testing: methods and protocolos, methods in molecular biology no (pp. 387-397) Humana Press, Product.
14. Hajati, H., A..Hassanabadi, and A. Teimouri Yansari. 2012. Effects of citrus pulp on performance and some blood parameters of broiler chickens. The 1th International and The 4th National Congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture 26 -27 April 2012 in Isfahan, Iran
15. Isakov, N., M. Feldmann, and S. Segel. 2005. The mechanism of modulation of humoral immuno responses after injection of mice with SRBC. Journal of Immunology, 128: 969-97.
16. Jahad Agriculture Ministry. 2010. Report of Agricultural Product in Iran. PP: 8-7.
17. Jamal, M. 2005. Carcass composition and visceral organ mass of broiler chicks fed different levels of olive pulp. Journal of Islamic University of Gaza, 13 (2): 75-84.
18. Jimenez-Moreno, E., J. M. Gonzalez-Alvarado, and A. de Coca-Sinova. 2009. Effects of source of fiber on the development and pH of the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 154: 93-101.
19. Matoo F.A., G.A. Beat Banday, and T.A.S. Ganaie. 2001. Performance of broilers fed on apple pomace diets supplemented with enzyme (S). Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 18 (4): 349-352.
20. Modarresi, J., M.H. Fathi Nasri, O. Dayani, and L. Rashidi. 2010. The effect of pomegranate seed pulp feeding on DMI, performance and blood metabolites of southern khorasan crossbred goats. Journal of Animal Science Research, 4: 123-132.
21. Montagne L., J.R. Pluske, and D. Hampson. 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fiber and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non ruminant animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 108: 95-117.
22. National Research Council (NRC). 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th rev.ed. 23. National Academy Press. Washington. DC .
23. Nazari, M., S.A. Hossini, H. Lotfollahian, and A. Zarei. 2012. The effect of lemon extract and probiotic on performance and carcass traits of broilers. Animal Science and Research Journal. 13: 69-72.
24. Nazic A.., M. Rezaei, and H. Sayyahzadeh. 2010. Effect of different levels of dried citrus pulp on performance, egg quality, and blood parameters of laying hens in early phase of production. Tropical Journal of Animal Health and Production, 42: 737-742.
25. Nobakht, A. 2012. The effects of using different levels of lemon pulp on performance and blood parameters of laying hens on the base of wheat diets. Animal Science Research Journal. 23 (4): 15-26.
26. Nobakht, A. 2013. Effects of different levels of dried lemon pulp on performance, carcass traits, blood biochemical and immunity parameters of broilers. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 3 (1): 145-151.
27. Nobakht, A. and B. Amiri Dashatan. 2014. Effect of different levels of lemon pulp (Citrus aurantifulia) on
28. Nobakht, A., F. Mahini and S. Khodaei. 2012b. Study the effect of commercial enzyme using on performance and carcass traits of broilers. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research. 4 (1): 32-38.
29. Nobakht, A., R. Baghbabaei, and A. Taghizadeh. 2012a. The effect of adding probio enzyme on performance and blood metabolites on broiler fed on the base of different levels of wheat and barley. Animal Science Research Journal. 22 (3): 1-14.
30. Nobakht, A., S. Ziaei, and A.R. Safamehr. 2013. Investigation the effects of different commercial multi enzymes and nutrient levels of diets on performance and carcass traits of broilers. Animal Science Journal (Pajouheh and Sazandeghi). 106: 197-208.
31. Noranian, S. and A. Nobakht. 2014. The effects of using grape pulp, enzyme and probiotic on performance, egg traits and blood metabolites of laying hens. Animal Science Research Journal, 24 (2): 155-169.
performance, carcass and blood parameters of meat type turkeys. Animal Production Research. 3 (2): 9-17.
32. Roghani, E. and H. Moeinizadeh. 2005. Poutry Diets from Waste. Ayish Publication. First (ed). PP: 241.
33. Samsamshariat, S.M. 2004. Medicinal Plant. First (ed). Many Publication. PP: 380.
34. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS Users guide: Statistics. 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
35. Syago-Ayerdi, S.G., A. Brenes, and I, Golm I. 2009a. Effect of grape antioxidant dietary fiber on the lipid oxidation of raw and cooked chicken hamburgers. Food Science and Technology, 42: 971-976.
36. Syago-Ayerdi, S.G., A. Brenesm, A., Viverosm and I, Golm. 2009b. Antioxidative effect of dietary grape pomace concentrate on lipid oxidation of chilled and long-term frozen stored chicken patties. Meat Science, 83: 528-533.
37. Valizadeh, M. and M. Moghaddam. 1994. Experimental Design in Agriculture 1. First ed. Pishtaz Elem Publication. PP: 25-100.
38. Zafar, f., M. Idrees, and Z. Ahmad. 2005. Use of apple byproducts in poultry rations of broiler chicks in Karachi. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 1: 13-17.
39. Zarghi, H., H. Kermanshahi, A. Raji. and A.R. Heravi. 2011. Effect of triticale and enzyme supplementation in starter diet on performance, digestive tract morphology and blood metabolites of broilers. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research. 3 (4): 324-334.