دوقلوزایی در گاوهای هلشتاین ایران: عوامل موثر بر میزان وقوع و پیامدهای تولیدی و تولید مثلی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- ژنتیک و اصلاح دام و طیور

نویسندگان

دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر جهت بررسی عوامل موثر بر میزان وقوع دوقلوزایی و تأثیر آن بر عملکردهای تولیدی و تولیدمثلی صورت پذیرفت. در این مطالعه، از اطلاعات 9 گله گاو شیری واقع در استان های اصفهان و خراسان رضوی که متشکل از 160410 زایش طی سال های 1380 تا 1392 بود، استفاده گردید. جهت بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر میزان وقوع دوقلوزایی و تأثیر دوقلوزایی بر بروز سخت زایی و مرده زایی از رویه لجستیک (Proc LOGISTIC) و جهت بررسی تأثیر دوقلوزایی بر عملکرد تولیدی و تولیدمثلی از رویه مدل خطی مختلط (Proc MIXED)، نرم افزار SAS استفاده شد. میانگین وقوع دوقلوزایی 7/2 درصد تخمین زده شد. دوقلوزایی در جمعیت مورد مطالعه یک روند فنوتیپی مثبت و معنی دار نشان داد. عوامل گله، سال، فصل و شکم زایش ارتباط معنی داری با میزان وقوع دوقلوزایی داشتند. گاوهای شکم اول (4/0 درصد) و گاوهای شکم چهارم (5/4 درصد)، فصل زمستان (2/2 درصد) و فصل تابستان (1/3 درصد) به ترتیب کمترین و بیشترین میزان وقوع را داشتند. با افزایش سن نخستین زایش، وقوع دوقلوزایی تمایل به افزایش نشان داد. دوقلوزایی تاثیر معنی داری بر تولید شیر، درصدهای چربی و پروتئین 305 روز نداشت. دوقلوزایی در گاوهای شکم اول و چند شکم، روزهای باز را به ترتیب 8/24 و 8/12 روز، و تعداد تلقیج منجر به آبستنی را 04/0 و 18/0واحد افزایش داد. پیامدهای تولید مثلی برای گاوهای شکم اول شدیدتر از گاوهای چندشکم بود. نتایج حاصل نشان داد که دوقلوزایی شانس ابتلا به سخت زایی و مرده زایی را افزایش داده در حالی که باعث کاهش طول دوره آبستنی می شود به ویژه اگر جنس هر دو گوساله نر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Twinning in Iranian Holstein Dairy Cattle: A Study of Risk Factors and Production and Reproduction Consequences

نویسندگان [English]

  • abolfazl mahnani
  • Ali sadeghisefidmazgi
  • alireza aghatehrani
Isfahan university of technology
چکیده [English]

Introduction Cattle are a monotocous species meaning that, under most circumstances, a successful pregnancy results in the birth of one calf. Twinning rate has been reported in dairy cows from 3 to 5 percent, which can be influenced by maternal age.The birth of twins is detrimental to the majority of beef and dairy cattle producer. Financial loss arising from any of twinning has been reported in Europe between 109 to 201 dollars in recent years. Because it is associated with undesirable consequences such as reduced survival, calf, cow increased removal rate and poor performance. This also reduces pregnancy rates and profitability herds. One of the effects of twinning severe is reduction of the number of calves for replacement fertility in dairy cows. This is a loss arising from an increase in infant mortality and a gender bias in bull calves homo zygote.Twinning rate increases significantly the incidence of reproductive abnormalities, including the retained placenta, dystocia, stillbirth and abortion. Many studies have been done on the effect of multiple pregnancies in cattle production and reproduction. Higher milk production for cows twin issue is controversial as some studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between the rate of twinning in dairy cattle and milk production. But in the next lactation, production for cows that have been the twin of the infected cow metabolic disease in the previous period was lower. In a study reported that cows spend fewer days in the twin peak production. The results of the study on the effect of twinning on reproductive traits of Holstein cows-Farzin showed that only half of the twin cows are prone to reproduce in the next period. It is also reported a greater number of insemination per conception in twin compared to single cows. In addition, it has been reported that the twin was more than 15 days from calving to first services. Average twin cows experiencing 1.7 times more death and removal in lifetime production than cows single.The aim of this study was to estimate the rate of twinning in Iranian Holstein dairy cows and the estimated effect on production traits and reproductive twinning.
Material and method Data from 9 Holstein dairy herds from 2 regions, Khorasan Resavie and Isfahan, in Iran during the period 2001 to 2013 were used. Editing of initial data set was done with Excel. Duplicate observations, missing data for calf condition and cows with age at first calving < 19 or > 45 month were excluded. Following all edits, 160,410 calving records of 52,562 cows were utilized.
According to binary nature of twinning, a logistical regression model was constructed to estimate the effect of bio-environmental risk factors on twinning using the LOGISTIC procedure of SAS the used model was as follows:
Logit (π) = α + β1X1+ β2X2+…. + βnXn (1)

A linear mixed model was used to analyze twinning effect on productive and reproductive traits using Proc Mixed of SAS Software. In this model fixed effects were included herd effect, calving season (calving year, parity, twinning, stillbirth and dystocia. The effect of other factors were considered as random. The mixed linear model used for this analysis included:

(2)

Results and discussion The incidence of twinning cases per cow per year was 2.7 %, on average. Herd, calving year, calving season and parity had a significant relationship with the incidence of twinning (P

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dairy cattle
  • Odds ratio
  • Production
  • Reproductive performance
1- Atashi, H., M. J. Zamiri., and M. B. Sayyadnejad. 2012. Effect of twinning and stillbirth on the shape of lactation curve in Holstein dairy cows of Iran. Arch Tierz, 55 (3), 226-233
2- Bar-Anan, R., and J. Bowman. 1974. Twinning in Israeli-Friesian dairy herds. Animal. Production. 18: 109-115.
3- Beerepoot, G., A. Dykhuizen., Y. Nielen., and Y. Schukken. 1992. The economics of naturally occurring twinning in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 75: 1044-1051.
4- Cady, R., and L. D. Van Vleck. 1978. Factors affecting twinning and effects of twinning in Holstein dairy cattle. Faculty Papers and Publications in Animal Science, 950-956.
5- Del Rio, N. S., S. Stewart., P. Rapnicki., Y. Chang., and P. Fricke. 2007. An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 90: 1255-1264.
6- Echternkamp, S. 1992. Fetal development in cattle with multiple ovulations. Journal of Animal Science, 70: 2309-2321.
7- Echternkamp, S. E., and K. E. Gregory.1999.Effects of twinning on gestation length, retained placenta, and dystocia. Journal of Animal Science, 77:39-47.
8- Echternkamp, S., R. Thallman., R. Cushman., M. Allan, and K. Gregory. 2007. Increased calf production in cattle selected for twin ovulations. Journal of Animal Science, 85: 3239-3248.
9- Eddy, R., O. Davies., and C. David. 1991. An economic assessment of twin births in British dairy herds. Vetenary Record, 129: 526-529.
10- Erb, R., and R. Morrison. 1959. Effects of Twinning on Reproductive Efficiency in a Holstein-Friesian Herd. Journal of Dairy Science, 42: 512-519.
11- Fricke, P., and M. Wiltbank. 1999. Effect of milk production on the incidence of double ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 52: 1133-1143.
12- Fricke, P. M. 2001. Twinning in Dairy Cattle. The professial animal scientist, 17:61–67.
13- Garry, F. 2004. An overview of animal welfare in the US dairy industry. Bovine Practitioner, 1-23.
14- Ghavi Hossein Zadeh, N. A., S. Nejati Javaremi., R. Miraei Ashtiani., and H. Kohram, 2008. An observational analysis of twin births, calf stillbirth, calf sex ratio, and abortion in Iranian Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 4198-4205.
15- Guerra-Martinez, P., G. Dickerson., G. Anderson., and R. Green. 1990. Embryo-transfer twinning and performance efficiency in beef production. Journal of Animal Science, 68: 4039-4050.
16- Johansson I., B. Lindhe., and F. Pirchner. 1974. Causes of variation in the frequency of monozygous and dizygous twinning in various breeds of cattle. Hereditas, 78: 201-234.
17- Karlsen, A., J. Ruane., G. Klemetsdal, and B. Heringstad. 2000. Twinning rate in Norwegian cattle: frequency, (co) variance components, and genetic trends. Journal of Animal Science, 78: 15-20.
18- Kinsel, M., W. Marsh., P. L. Ruegg., and W. Etherington. 1998. Risk factors for twinning in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 81: 989-993.
19- Kirkpatrick, B. 2002. Management of twinning cow herds. Journal of Animal Science, 80: E14-E18.
20- Komisarek, J., and Z. Dorynek. 2002. Genetic aspects of twinning in cattle. Journal of Applied Genetic, 43: 55-68.
21- Labhsetwar, A. P., W. Tyler., and L. Casida. 1963. Analysis of variation in some factors affecting multiple ovulations in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 46: 840-842.
22- Lopez-Gatius, F., O. Szenci., G. Bech-Sabat., I. Garcia-Ispierto., B. Serrano., P. Santolaria., and J. Yaniz. 2009. Factors of non-infectious nature affecting late embryonic and early foetal loss in high producing dairy herds in north-eastern Spain: literature review. Magyar Allatorvosok Lapja, 131: 515-531.
23- Markusfeld, O. 1987. Periparturient traits in seven high dairy herds. Incidence rates, association with parity, and interrelationships among traits. Journal of Dairy Science, 70: 158-166.
24- Mostafa, A. 2009. Effect of twin vs. single births on gestation length, reproductive performance, dystocia, calf survival rate and culling in Holstein cows. Journal of Vetenary. Medicine, 19: 19-23.
25- Nielen, M., Y. Schukken., D. Scholl., H. Wilbrink., and A. Brand. 1989. Twinning in dairy cattle: a study of risk factors and effects. Theriogenology, 32: 845-862.
26- Sreenan, J., and M. Diskin. 1989. Effect of a unilateral or bilateral twin embryo distribution on twinning and embryo survival rate in the cow. Journal of. Reproduction and fertility, 87: 657-664.
27- Wiltbank, M., P. Fricke., S. Sangsritavong., R. Sartori., and O. Ginther. 2000. Mechanisms that prevent and produce double ovulations in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 2998-3007.