برآورد روند ژنتیکی، فنوتیپی و محیطی صفات وزن بدن در سنین مختلف در گوسفند لری

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- ژنتیک و اصلاح دام و طیور

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان

2 گروه علوم دامی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، خوزستان، ایران.

3 مرکزتحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان، لرستان، ایران.

4 گروه ژنتیک و اصلاح نژاد دام ، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی رامین خوزستان، ملاثانی، ایران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر برآورد روند ژنتیکی، فنوتیپی و محیطی صفات وزن بدن در سنین مختلف در گوسفندان لری جهت ارزیابی برنامه‏های اصلاح نژادی در این نژاد بود. به این منظور از تعداد 6440، 5646، 5073 و 4757 رکورد مربوط به صفات وزن ‌تولد، شیر‌گیری، شش‌ ماهگی و نه ‌‌ماهگی گوسفندان لری که طی سال‌های 1380 تا 1389 توسط مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان لرستان جمع‏آوری شده بود، استفاده گردید. وراثت‏پذیری مستقیم و مادری صفات با استفاده از روش حداکثر درستنمایی محدود شده و برازش شش مدل حیوانی تک صفتی برآورد شدند. انتخاب مناسب‏ترین مدل برای هر صفت با استفاده از معیار اطلاعات آکایک صورت گرفت. ارزش‏های اصلاحی جهت محاسبه روند ژنتیکی هر صفت، با استفاده از بهترین مدل دام تک صفتی برآورد گردید. روند فنوتیپی، ژنتیکی و محیطی به ترتیب از طریق تابعیت میانگین فنوتیپی، میانگین ارزش اصلاحی و تفاوت ارزش اصلاحی از ارزش فنوتیپی بر سال تولد برآورد شدند. روند فنوتیپی برای صفات وزن تولد، شیرگیری، شش ماهگی و نه ماهگی به ترتیب 016/0، 065/0، 032/0 و 783/0- کیلوگرم در سال برآورد شد. روند ژنتیکی مستقیم برای صفات وزن تولد، شیرگیری، شش ماهگی و نه ماهگی به ترتیب 008/0، 001/0، 055/0 و 076/0 کیلوگرم در سال برآورد شد. روند ژنتیکی مستقیم برای همه صفات به جز وزن نه ‏ماهگی معنی‏دار بود. پیشرفت ژنتیکی برای همه صفات ناچیز بود. عدم وجود یک معیار انتخاب صحیح و نیز نوسانات شرایط محیطی و مدیریتی از عوامل مهم ‏در پایین بودن میزان پیشرفت ژنتیکی در حیوانات مورد مطالعه در این تحقیق می‏باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Estimation of genetic, phenotypic and environmental trends for body weights at different ages in Lori sheep

نویسندگان [English]

  • zahra yeganehpour 1
  • Hedayatollah roshanfekr 2
  • Jamal Fayazi 1
  • Mir Hasan Beiranvand 3
  • reza pasandideh 4
1 Khuzestan Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University
2 Department of Animal Science, University of Khuzestan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Khuzestan, Iran.
3 Member of Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, Lorestan, Lorestan, Iran.
4 Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction Lori sheep is one of the most important breeds in Iran that is mostly bred in Lorestan province, north-east of Khuzestan and some areas of Ilam provinces. The name of this breed is derived from Lori tribe, which is one of the major nomadic groups of Zagros Mountain in western areas of Iran. Lori sheep is resistant to mountain conditions and hot and dry plains. This sheep breed has strong constitution, good traveling ability with suitable conformation as a mountain sheep. It is one of the predisposed breeds to fattening and often is traditionally kept by villagers and nomadic tribes in the area. In such a system output is lower than in an intensive system. Meat production in Iran is one of the most valuable traits for livestock breeders. Also, sheep meat has remarkable values rather than the meat of other animals and is popular between people. Thus accurate estimations of genetic parameters of these traits are considered by breeders. Accurate prediction of breeding value of animals is one of the best tools available to maximize genetic gain. Success of a breeding programme can be evaluated by actual change in breeding value expressed as a proportion of expected theoretical change of the breeding value mean for the trait under selection. Several methods are being developed to measuring the genetic changes in the animal population. Carrying out experiments in comparable environmental conditions over a period of several generations is difficult, thus genetic trend estimation is problematic over time and changes in performance may reflect, to some extent, both environmental and genetic changes. In order to overcome such a problem, Hill (1972) proposed that by simultaneously maintaining a control population it is possible to removing the effect of environmental changes, but this is not cost-effective, particularly over a long period of time. Best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) is the best approach for prediction of breeding values and estimation genetic gain. Little information is available on the estimation genetic trends for body weight traits in Lori sheep. Hereupon the objective of the present study was to estimate genetic, phenotypic and environmental trends for body weight traits at different ages in Lori sheep to assess the breeding programmes.
Material and Methods In the current study, 6440, 5646, 5073 and 4757 records of birth weight (BW), weaning weigh (WW), 6-month weigh (6MW) and 9-month weigh (9MW) of Lori sheep were used. Data were collected from 2001 to 2010 by the agricultural and natural resources research centre of Lorestan province Lorestan Agricultural & Natural Resources Research Center. Direct and maternal heritability were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood by fitting six uni-variate animal models. Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) was used to selecting (to select or in/for selecting) the most appropriate model for each trait. Breeding values were estimated by the best model for uni-variate analysis. Genetic, phenotypic and environmental trends were calculated by regression of means of predicted breeding values, phenotypic means and difference between estimated means of breeding values and phenotypic means on birth year for each trait, respectively. Wombat software was performed to obtaining direct and maternal (co) variance components and heritability estimations for body weight at different ages in Lori sheep. Genetic trends analyses were performed by the regression procedure of the SAS software package.
Results and Discussion The phenotypic trends for BW, WW, 6MW and 9MW were 0.016, 0.065, 0.032 and -0.783 kg per year, respectively. The direct genetic trends for BW, WW, 6MW and 9MW were 0.008, 0.001, 0.055 and 0.076 kg per year, respectively. The direct genetic trends were significant for all of the traits with the exception of 9MW. Genetic gain for BW, WW, 6MW and 9MW were 0.061, 0.007, 0.139 and 0.150 kg after 10 years, respectively. Hence, genetic gain for all of the studied traits was low.
Conclusion In studied flock, the effective major factors in low genetic gain were the lack of a proper selection criteria and environmental and management conditions changes. Agricultural Jihad Organisation of Lorestan province has performed a breeding programme to improvinge Lori sheep by replacing the original breed rams in local flocks. This approach is very suitable and it is necessary to continue. Economic selection index method is an important tool that can help to improving (improving/to improve) genetic progress for body weight traits at Lori sheep.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Body weight traits
  • Genetic trend
  • Lori sheep
  • Phenotypic trend
1. Akaike, H. 1983. Information measures and model selection. Proceedings of the 44th session of the international statistical institute, 1:277-291.
2. Beyranvand, F., J. Fayazi, M. T. Beygi Nassiri, and S. Asadollahi. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters for growth traits and genetic and phenotypic trends of reproductive traits in the nomadic Lori sheep flocks. Animal Production Research, 2:21-30. (in Persian).
3. Bougenane, I., and M. Kerfal. 1990. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for growth traits of D'Man lambs. Animal Production, 50:173-178.
4. Ceyhan, A., T. Sezenler, and I. Erdogan. 2009. The estimation of variance components for prolificacy and growth traits of Sakýz sheep. Livestock Science, 122:68–72.
5. Dixit, S. P. G., K. Singh, K. Chadda, and J. S. Dhillon. 2002. Estimates of genetic trends in a closed flock of Bharat Merino sheep. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 72:462-464.
6. Dorostkar, M., S. A. Rafat, J. Shodja, and N. Pirany. 2010. Study of Genetic and Phenotype Trends of Some of Growth Traits in Moghani Sheep. Journal of Animal Science Research, 4:15-25. (in Persian).
7. Gholizadeh, M., G. Rahimi Mianji, M. Hashemi, and H. Hafezian. 2010. Genetic parameter estimates for birth and weaning weights in Raeini goats. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55:30–36.
8. Gowane, G. R., A. Chopra, L. L. Prince, A. K. Mishra, and A. L. Arora. 2011. Genetic analysis for growth traits of prolific Garole × Malpura (GM) sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43:299-303.
9. Grizw, S., S. Lemma, H. Komen, and J. A. M. Van Arendonk. 2007. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trend for live weight and fleece traits in Menz sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 70:145-153.
10. Hanford, K. J., L. D. Van Vleck, and G. D. Snowder. 2005. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Rambouillet sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 57:175–186.
11. Hassani, S., H. Deltang Sefidsanghi, A. Rashidi, and M. Ahani Azari. 2009. Estimation of Genetic, Phenotypic and Environment Trends for Some Growth Traits in Baluchi Sheep. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 16:126-132. (in Persian).
12. Hill, W. G. 1972. Estimation of genetic change. I. General theory and design of control populations. Animal Breeding Abstracts, 40:1–15.
13. Hossein-Zadeh, N. G., and M. Ardalan. 2010. Comparison of different models for the estimation of genetic parameters of body weight traits in Moghani sheep. Agricultural and Food Science, 19:207-213.
14. Jafaroghli, M., A. Rashidi, M. S. Mokhtari, and A. A. Shadparvar. 2010. (Co) Variance components and genetic parameter estimates for growth traits in Moghani sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 91:170-177.
15. Jiang, D., Y. Zhang, K. Tinna, L. Liu, x. Xu, Y. Zhang, and T. Zhang. 2011. Estimation of (co)variance components and genetic parameters for growth and wool traits of Chinese superfine merino sheep with the use of a multi-trait animal model. Livestock Science, 138:278-288.
16. Jurado, J. J., A. Alonso, and R. Alenda. 1994. Selection response for growth in Spanish Merino flock. Journal of Animal Science, 72:1433–1440.
17. Khaldari, M. 2005. Principles of sheep and goat husbandry. University of Tehran Press. (In Persian).
18. Lavvaf, A., and A. Noshary. 2008. Estimation of genetic parameters and environmental factors on early growth traits for Lori breeds sheep using single trait animal model. Pakistan Journal of Animal Science, 11:74-79.
19. Meyer, K. 2006. WOMBAT—a program for mixed model analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. User notes. Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit, Armidale. 55p.
20. Mohammadi, H., and M. Sadeghi. 2010. Estimation of genetic parameters for growth and reproduction traits and genetic trend of growth traits in Zel sheep under rural system. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 41:231-241. (in Persian).
21. Mohammadi, H., M. Moradi shahrebabak, and M. Sadeghi. 2011. Estimation of genetic, phenotypic and environmental trends of growth traits in Zandi sheep. Modern Genetics Journal, 6:49-57. (in Persian).
22. Mrode, R. A. 2005. Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values. 2nd edition. CAB International Press. 344p.
23. Narimani, M., B. Hemmati, and M. Honarvar. 2009. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters of growth traits in Taleshi sheep. Journal of Animal Science Research, 8:45-57. (in Persian).
24. Piper, L., and A. Ruviskey. 1997. The genetic of sheep. Cab International. UK.
25. Rashidi, A. 1992. Estimation of genetic parameters for economical traits in Moghani sheep. M.Sc. thesis, University of Mashhad, Iran. 191pp.
26. Rashidi, A., and H. Akhshi. 2007. Estimation of genetic and environmental trends for growth traits in Kordish sheep. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 38:329-335. (in Persian).
27. Rashidi, A., M. Sattaei Mokhtari, A. Safi Jahanshahi, and M. R. Mohammadabadi. 2008. Genetic parameter estimates of pre-weaning growth traits in Kermani sheep. Small Ruminant Research,74:165-171.
28. Saghi, D. A., H. Khadivi, M. Navidzadeh, and M. Nikbakhti. 2007. Study on Influence of Environmental .Effect -on Birth Weight, Weaning Weight and Dairy Growth of Baluchi Sheep. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 6: 436-437.
29. Sargolzaei, M., and M. A. Edris. 2004. Estimation of Phenotypic, genetic and environmental trends for some of growth traits in Bakhtiari sheep. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 8:125-134. (in Persian).
30. Sargolzaei, M., H. Iwaisaki, and J. J. Colleau. 2006. Contribution, Inbreeding F, Coancestry (CFC). A software package for pedigree analysis and monitoring genetic diversity. Release 1.0. Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181, Japan.
31. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. ISBN 1-59047- 243-8.
32. Sataei mokhtari, M., A. Rashidi, M. R. Mohammadabadi, and H. Moradi shahrebabak. 2009. Estimation of genetic, phenotypic and environmental trends of growth traits in Kermani sheep. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 40:51-57. (in Persian).
33. Shaat, I., S. Galal, and H. Mansour. 2004. Genetic trends for lamb weights in flocks of Egyptian Rahmani and Ossimi sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 51:23–28.
34. Shokrollahi, B., and M. Zandieh. 2012. Estimation of genetic parameters for body weights of Kurdish sheep in various ages using multivariate animal models. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11:2119-2123.
35. Singh, G., and J. S. Dhillon. 1990. Estimation of genetic trend in a closed flock of Avivastra sheep. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 60:617-619.
36. Vatankhah, M., and M. A. Talebi. 2008. Heritability estimates and correlations between production and reproductive traits in Lori- Bakhtiari sheep in Iran. South African Journal of Animal Science, 38:110-118.
CAPTCHA Image