بررسی امکان جایگزینی مخلوط پروتئینی به‌جای کنجاله‌ سویا و مکمل‌ مخلوط آنزیمی بر عملکرد جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبد کاووس، ایران.

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشگاه گنبدکاووس، گنبد کاووس، ایران.

چکیده

آزمایشی به ­منظور بررسی اثر سطوح مختلف جایگزینی مخلوط پروتئینی (کنجاله کانولا و پودر ضایعات کشتارگاهی طیور) با کنجاله سویا در جیره و مکمل مخلوط آنزیمی بر عملکرد جوجه‌های گوشتی انجام شد. آزمایش با تعداد 384 قطعه جوجه سویه تجاری راس 308 با 8 تیمار به صورت فاکتوریل4×2 (4 سطح جایگزینی مخلوط پروتئینی: صفر، 25، 50 و 75 درصد×2 سطح مخلوط آنزیمی: صفر و 250 میلی­گرم درکیلوگرم خوراک) با 4 تکرار 12 قطعه­ای جوجه از هر دو جنس و در قالب طرح کاملاًتصادفی انجام گرفت. در دوره 24-1 روزگی در جیره­های بدون آنزیم، سطح جایگزینی 75 درصد به­طور معنی­دار باعث بیشترین کاهش وزن و افزایش ضریب تبدیل خوراک شد اما در جیره­های دارای آنزیم، سطوح 50 و 75 درصد جایگزینی وزن بدن و ضریب تبدیل مشابهی داشتند. در دوره 1 تا 42 روزگی مصرف آنزیم تأثیر معنی­داری صفات تولیدی، اقتصادی و خصوصیات لاشه ایجاد نکرد اما باعث افزایش معنی­دار چربی محوطه شکمی شد. جایگزینی 25 درصدی مخلوط پروتئینی با کنجاله سویا  تأثیر معنی­داری بر وزن بدن، هزینه خوراک به­اضافه وزن، بازده ناخالص اقتصادی و خصوصیات لاشه ایجاد نکرد اما باعث افزایش معنی­دار ضریب تبدیل خوراک و کاهش شاخص تولید گردید. سطوح بالاتر جایگزینی باعث کاهش بیشتر وزن بدن، شاخص تولید و بازده ناخالص اقتصادی شد. به طور­کلی نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از مخلوط آنزیمی تاثیر چندانی بر عملکرد جوجه­های گوشتی نداشت اما بسته به شرایط بازار جایگزینی مخلوط پروتئینی با کنجاله سویا در حد 25 درصد می­تواند از نظر اقتصادی برای پرورش­دهنده توجیه پذیر باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigation on substitution possibility of proteinous mixture with soybean meal and multi-enzyme supplementation on broiler performance

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Izanloo 1
  • shahriar Maghsoudlou 2
  • zahra Taraz 2
  • Farzad Ghanbari 2
1 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran.
2 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad Kavous, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction  It is advantageous to include as many ingredients as possible when formulating a diet for broiler chickens, because the supplementary nature of nutrients in different feedstuffs promotes the reduction of nutrient variation. The results of some experiments have shown that diet uniformity, through variance reduction for nutrients, improves broiler performance. In addition, lower variability of nutrients reduces the possibility of nutrient wastage. Also, in practical feed formulation when using of cheaper feed ingredients such as canola meal (CM) or poultry by-product meal (PBM) instead of more expensive ingredients such as soybean meal (SBM) in such a way that inclusion of them didn’t result in a lower production and quality indices thus they may result in a lower feed costs and higher economic benefit for producer. Both CM and PBM are good sources of protein for broilers and less expensive than SBM. Canola meal is a worthful feed ingredient and according to climatic condition and type of processing contains 36-39% crude protein. It may consider as a good source of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, manganese, zinc, and iron as well as relatively good source of methionine and lysine. Poultry by product meal can be used in poultry ration up to 6% of total feed if sanitary operations is observed. High levels of fat, moisture and feather contents are main drawbacks of PBM in the poultry rations. However, if PBM mixed with CM that has low levels of fat and moisture, a proteinous mixture will result with similar CP level to SBM and longer storage potential. Both CM and PBM have lower nutrient digestibility as crude protein, fats and trace minerals because of phytate and NSP and dietary exogenous enzymes may improve digestibility of nutrients. The results of some researches showed that Kemin multi-enzyme supplementation improved broiler performance or carcass characters. This research is carried out for study effect of different substitution of a proteinous mixture composed of CM and PBM (65%:35%) with SBM with Kemin WP multi-enzyme supplementation on production and economic performances of broiler chickens.      
Materials and Methods This experiment was conducted in a factorial arrangement 4×2 (4 levels of proteinous mixture replaced with SBM: 0, 25, 50 and 75%×2 levels of Kemin WP multi-enzyme supplementation: 0 and 250mg/kg diet) with 8 treatments, 4 replicates of 12 pieces of Ross308 strain broiler chicks of either sex reared on 1×1.25m floor pens in a completely randomized design. Proteinous mixture was made by proper mixing of CM and PBM (65%:35). During experimental period chickens were received mash diet according to Ross308 feed specification booklet (2014) for as hatched broilers. Feed and water were prepared for broilers ad-libitum. Body weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), production index, feed cost to gain (Rials/kg), and monetary returns (Rials/bird) were measured or calculated at different phases of growth period. At the end of growth period (42 days of age) one bird similar in body weight to average weight of each replicate was selected and sacrificed for carcass character measurements. Collected data were subjected to analysis of variance by ANOVA procedure of SAS2003Software. Treatment means were separated using Duncan multiple range test at 0.05 significant level.
Results and Discussion At shorter growth period of 1-24 days, there was a significant interaction between dietary multi-enzyme supplementation and different substitution levels of protein mixture and SBM on body weight and FCR. As, in diets without multi-enzyme supplement,75% substitution of protein mixture with SBM significantly resulted in the most decrease in body weight and increase in FCR however, in diets with enzyme supplement 50 and 75% substitution levels of protein mixture with SBM resulted in a non-significant difference in body weight and FCR of chickens. It is reported that commercial multi-enzymes in broiler diets resulted in an increase in body weight and decrease in FCR. Also, there are some evidences that the mean retention time of digesta in different parts as well as whole digestive tracts of broilers in diets with CM was significantly less than SBM diets and this may be the cause of decrease in digestion and absorption of nutrients in diets with CM. It is reported that the use of more than 6% poultry offal meal in broiler diet resulted in a lower production performance and higher FCR and the causes of these phenomena should be searched in lower quality and palatability of poultry offal meal with higher level usage in the diet. Protein mixture substituted with SBM resulted in the lower feed cost to gain. However, diets with 50 and 75% substitution levels resulted in a significant decrease in MR compared with 0 and 25% substitution levels. Different substitution levels of protein mixture with SBM had no significant effect on carcass characters, however, dietary multi-enzyme supplementation resulted in a significant higher abdominal fat percentage. Similar to these results, it is reported that multi-enzyme supplementation resulted in higher abdominal fat percentages in broiler chickens. The lipase content in multi-enzyme may cause increase in digestion, absorption and deposition of fat in the body.   
Conclusion This study results showed that 25% dietary protein mixture substitution with SBM in the broiler diet did not show significant negative impact on economic performance of broiler chickens and could potentially be used as a substitute for more expensive soybean meal protein. Also, the use of multi-enzyme supplementation in the diet restricted to the age of chickens and the quality of protein source. As considering lower growth period of 24 days and 75% substitution levels of protein mixture with SBM multi enzyme supplement may result in a better FCR. However, for production of broilers with 42 days of age multi-enzyme supplementation in the diet had no significant positive effect on broiler performance and its economic traits.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • broiler chicken
  • canola meal
  • protein mixture
  • poultry offal meal
  • performance
  1. Bhargava, K., and J. B. O' Neil. 1975. Composition and utilization of poultry by-product and hydrolysed feather meal in broiler diets. Poultry Science, 54:1511-1518.
  2. Café, M. B., C. A. Borges, C. A. Fritts, and P. W. Waldroup. 2002. Avizyme improves performance of broilers fed corn-soybean meal-based diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 11: 29-33.
  3. Canola Council of Canada. 2009. Canola Meal Feed Industry Guide. 4th Canadian International Grain Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  4. Davoudi, J., Sh. Golzar, Y. Haji Asghari, Gh. Moghaddam, and A. 2007. Effect of replacing dietary levels of soybean meal with rapeseed meal on broiler chicks.  Agroecology Journal (Journal of New Agricultural Science), 3(6): 28-39 (In Persian).
  5. deBrum, P. A. R., S. Rosa,  A. L. Guidoni, D. L. Zanotto,  and R. L. Kerber.  1998. Utilizacao de farelo de canola em dietas para frangos de corte. Conferencia Apinco de Ciencia e Tecnologia Avicolas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  6. El Boushy, A. R. and A. E. Roodbeen. 1984. Amino acid availability in dry poultry waste in comparison with relevant feedstuffs. Poultry Science, 63: 583-585.
  7. Escalona, R. R., and G. M. Pesti. 1987. Nutritive value of poultry by-product meal: 3. Incorporation into practical diets. Poultry Science. 66: 1067-1070.
  8. Faraji Nafchi, M., and F. Khajali. 2010. Use of canola meal in place of soybean meal in the female broiler diet. 4thIranian Congress of Animal Science, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran (Karaj). (In Persian).
  9. Fouad, A. M., and H. K. El-Senousey. 2014. Nutritional factors affecting abdominal fat depositionin poultry: A review. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 27 (7): 1057-1068.
  10. Gao, Z., J. Li, and H. Petterson. 1988. Effects of feeding broilers with rapeseed meal, containing different levels of total glucosinolates and progoitrin. Zhongguo Nongyn Kexue (ch), 21: 84-90.
  11. Geshlogh Olyayee, M., H. Jonmohammadi, A. Taghizadeh, and S. Rafat. 2011. Effects of poultry by-product meal on performance, egg quality and blood parameters of commercial laying hens at the 42-52 weeks of age. Animal Science Researches (Tabriz University), 21(1): 29-42. (In Persian).
  12. Goli, S., H. Aghdam Shahriar, Y. Ebrahim Nezhad, M. Ghaderi Jouybari, H. Razavi, and V. IsmailPoor. 2010. Investigation effect of enzymes supplementation on performance and some blood biochemistry parameters broilers. Journal of Animal Science, 3 (3): 87-98. (In Persian).
  13. Goli, S. and H. Aghdam Shahryar. 2015. Effect of enzymes supplementation (rovabio and kemin) on some blood biochemical parameters, performance and carcass characterizes in broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 5(1): 127-131.
  14. Gopinger, E., E. G. Xavier, J. S. Lemes, P.O Moraes, M. C. Elias and V. F. B. Roll. 2014. Carcass yield and meat quality in broilers fed with canola meal. British Poultrty Science, 55(6): 817-823.
  15. Heger, J., and A. Fernando. 1999. The effect of enzyme supplementation on the metabolizable energy of barley and wheat for broiler chicks. 12th European symposium on poultry nutrition. Veldhoven, The Netherlands. 440 – 442.
  16. Kalantar, M., and A. Fahimi. 2005. Effect of using poultry–by product meal in broiler feeding. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 67: 28-34 (In Persian).
  17. Khajali, F., M. Tahmasebi, H. Hassanpour, M. R. Akbari., D. Qujeq, and R. F. Wideman. 2011. Effects of supplementation of canola meal-based diets with arginine on performance, plasma nitric oxide, and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens grown at high altitude. Poultry Science, 90: 2287-2294.
  18. Khosravinia, H., A. Azarfar., and A. Sokhtehzary. 2015. Effects of substituting fish meal with poultry by-product meal in broiler diets on blood urea and uric acid concentrations and nitrogen content of litter. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 43: 191–195.
  19. Kocher, A., M. Choct, G. Ross, J. Broz, and T. K. Chung. 2003. Effects of enzyme combinations on apparent metabolizable energy of corn soybean meal-based diets in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12: 275-283.
  20. Lee, P. A., S. Pittam, and R. Hill. 1984. The voluntary food intake by growing pigs of diets containing treated rapeseed meals of extracts of rapeseed meal. British Journal of Nutrition, 52: 159-164.
  21. Leeson, S., J. O. Atteh, and J. D. Summers. 1987. The replacement value of canola meal for Soybean meal in poultry diets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 67: 151-158.
  22. Leeson, S. and J. D. Summers. 2005. Commercial Poultry Nutrition, 3rd University Books, P.O. Box 1326, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. PP: 50-51.
  23. Malekzadegan, A., M. Zaghari, M. Shivazad, and S. Khalji. 2010. The effect of adding a commercial multimeric enzyme containing microbial phytase on performance of broilers in phosphorus deficient diets. 4th Iranian Congress of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran (In Persian).
  24. McCoy, R. A., K. C. Behnke, J. D. Hancock, and R. R. McEllhiney.1994. Effect of maximum uniformity on broiler chick performance. Poultry Science, 73: 443-451.
  25. Mohammadigheisar, M., H. S. Kim, and I. H. Kim. 2018. Effect of inclusion of lysolecithin or multi-enzyme in low energy diet of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1): 1198-1201.
  26. Moradi, M., S. Maghsoudlou, F. Rostami, and Y. Mostafalu. 2013. Effect of different substitution levels of extruded soybean with soybean meal and different dietary vitamin E levels on production index and economic traits of broilers. Animal Production Research, 1 (4): 15-25 (In Persian).
  27. Moradi, M., S. Maghsoudlou, Y. Mostafaloo and F. Rostami. 2012. Effect of different substitution levels of extruded soybean with soybean meal and dietary vitamin E level on oxidative stability broiler meat. 5th Animal Science Congress, Sep. 2012. Industrial Isfahan University pp: 892-896.
  28. Mushtaq, T., M. Sarwar, G. Ahmad, M. A. Mirza, H. Nawaz, M. M., Mushtaq, and U. Noreen. 2007. Influence of canola meal-based diets supplemented with exogenous enzyme and digestible lysine on performance, digestibility, carcass, and immune responses of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 86: 2144-2151. 
  29. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington DC.
  30. Nicknafs, F., V. Taghizadeh, H. Ebrahimi, and F. Ahmadian. 2007. Effects of rapeseed meal and its feeding time on broiler performance and economical parameters. The Scientific Journal of Agriculture (SJA), 30 (1): 25-25 (In Persian).
  31. Proudfoot, F. G., and H. W. Hulan. 1982. Effects of reduced feeding time using all mash or crumble-pellet dietary regimens on chicken broiler performance, including the incidence of acute death syndrome. Poultry Science, 61: 750-754.
  32. Sahraei, M., H. Lotfollahian, and A. Ghanbari. 2012. Effect of poultry by product meal on performance parameters, serum uric acid concentration and carcass characteristics. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2(1): 73-77.
  33. Salari Telmadareh., Y. 2015. Effect of different levels of protein mixture of canola meal and poultry by-product (extruded and not extruded) with soybean meal on broiler performance. Master of Science Thesis, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Gonbad Kavous University (In Persian).
  34. Salari Telemadareh, Y., S. Maghsoudlou, J. Bayat Kohsar, and M. Rostami Charati. 2015. Effect of different levels of replacement of protein mixture of canola meal and poultry by-product (extruded and not extruded) with soybean meal on 28-day-old broiler chickens. Advance Researches in Animal Science Conference, Birjand, Iran. 517-514 (In Persian).
  35. Shahir, M. H., R. Rahimi, H. R. Taheri, A. Heidainiya, N. Baradaran and Z. Asadi Kermani. 2016. Effect of protein source and protease addition on performance, blood metabolites and nutrient digestibility of turkeys fed on low-protein diets from 28 to 55 d post hatch. British Poultry Science, 57 (3):390-396.
  36. Shekari, M., M. Shahir, And A. Abdi Ghezelje. 2012. Effects of different levels of canola meal in corn or wheat based diets on broiler performance. Animal Science Researches (Tabriz University), 22 (2): 131-145 (In Persian).
  37. Shires, A., J. R. Thompson, B. V. Turner, P.M. Kenedy and Y. K. Goh. 1987. Rate of passage of corn-canola meal and corn soybean diets through the gastrointestinal tract of broiler and with leghorn chickens. Poultry Science, 66: 289-298.
  38. Sklan, D., Z. Tenn, and P. Budowski. 1983. The effect of dietary fat and tocopherol on lipolysis and oxidation in turkey meat stored at different temperatures. Poultry Science, 62: 2017-2021.
  39. Summers, J. D. and S. Leeson.1977. Effect of thyroxine and thiouracil addition to the diets containing rapeseed meal on chick growth and carcass composition. Poultry Science, 70: 685-694.
  40. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc. 2003. SAS/STAT User Guide, Release 9.1 ed. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, N.C., U.S.A.
  41. Tarladgis, B. G., M. T. Watts, and B. T. Younathan, 1960. Distillation method for quantitative determination of malondialdehyde in rancid foods. Journal of American Chemistry Society, 37: 44–49.
  42. Tandogan, M. and H. Cicek. 2016. Technical performance and cost analysis of broiler production in Turkey. Brazillian Journal of Poultry Science, 18 (1): 169-174.
  43. Taraz, Z., S. Jalali, and F. Rafeie. 2006. Effects of replacement of soybean meal with rapeseed meal on organs weight some blood biochemical parameters and performance of broiler chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5: 1110–1115.
  44. Toghyani, M., C. K. Girish, S. B. Wu, P. A. Iji and R. A. Swick. 2017. Effect of elevated dietary amino acid levels in high canola meal diets on productive traits and cecal microbiota population of broiler chickens in a pair-feeding study. Poultry Science, 96: 1268-1279.
  45. Wang Z. R., S. Y. Qiao, W. Q.  Lu, and D. F. Li. 2005. Effects of enzyme supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, gastrointestinal morphology and volatile fatty acid profiles in the hindgut of broilers fed wheat-based diets. Poultry Science, 84: 875-881.
  46. Zanella, I., N. K. Sakomura, F. G. Silversides, A. Fiqueirdo, and M. Pack. 1999. Effect of enzyme supplementation of broiler diets based on corn and soybeans. Poultry Science, 78: 561-568.
  47. Zeb, A. 1998. Possibilities and limitation of feeding rapeseed meal to broiler chicks. Ph.D. degree thesis. Georg-August University Goettingen. 125 pp.
  48. Zhang, F., and W. B. Roush. 2002. Multiple-Objective (Goal) programming model for feed formulation: An example for reducing nutrient variation. Poultry Science, 81: 182-192.

 

CAPTCHA Image