اثر مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید در جیره‏های حاوی منابع و سطوح مختلف چربی بر پارامترهای سرم خون، ریخت‌شناسی روده کوچک، فلور میکروبی سکوم و عملکرد جوجه‌های‌گوشتی در دوره آغازین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشـاورزی، دانشـگاه فردوسـی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده

آزمایش به‌صورت طرح کاملاً تصادفی با روش فاکتوریل جهت ارزیابی اثر مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید (0 و 25/0 گرم در کیلوگرم) در جیره‏های ذرت– کنجاله سویا که حاوی سه منبع چربی (روغن سویا، پیه‏گاوی و مخلوط 50 :50) و هریک در دو سطح (5/1 و 3 درصد) با 12 جیره آغازین ایزوکالریک و ایزونیتروژنوس انجام شد. هر جیره به شش تکرار دارای 10 قطعه جوجه‏گوشتی در دوره 1 تا 14 روزگی تغذیه و صفات عملکردی، ریخت‌شناسی ژژنوم، ترکیب لیپیدهای سرم خون، جمعیت میکروبی سکوم یک جوجه از هر تکرار در پایان 14 روزگی اندازه‏گیری شد. اثرات متقابل مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید، منبع چربی و سطح چربی جیره بر عملکرد جوجه‏ها در این دوره معنی‏دار نبود و فقط اثر متقابل مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید و سطح چربی بر مصرف خوراک معنی‏دار بود (05/0p<). اثر متقابل مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید و سطح چربی جیره بر عرض پرز معنی‏دار بود (05/0p<). اثر سطح چربی جیره بر ارتفاع پرز معنی‏دار بود و سطح سه درصد سبب افزایش آن شد. اثر متقابل مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید و سطح چربی بر میزان تری‏گلیسیرید سرم و اثر مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید و منبع چربی جیره بر میزان LDL سرم جوجه‏های گوشتی معنی‏دار بودند (05/0p<). اثر مکمل لیزوفسفوپیپید بر میزان تری‏گلیسرید و همچنین منبع چربی جیره بر میزان کلسترول و HDL سرم معنی‏دار بود (05/0p<). مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید بر جمعیت لاکتوباسیلوس و سطح چربی جیره بر جمعیت اشریشیاکلی تأثیر معنی‏دار داشتند (05/0p<). بررسی نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که مکمل لیزوفسفولیپید بر عملکرد جوجه‏های گوشتی در دوره آغازین تأثیر نداشت، ولی سبب افزایش جمعیت لاکتوباسیلوس‌ها و کاهش تری‌گلیسرید سرم خون شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Lysophospholipid (LPLs) Supplementation in Diets Differing in Fat Sources on Blood Parameters, Intestinal Morphology, Ceca Microbiome and Performance in Broiler Chicks during Starter Period

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali akbar Salari 1
  • Abolghasem Golian 2
  • Ahmad Hassanabadi 3
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction Feed cost has gradually increased in poultry production worldwide. One approach to minimizing production cost is dietary manipulation of nutrient supplies through improved feed efficiency. The inclusion of lipids in broiler diets is essential to meet metabolisable energy requirement. Great amounts of animal fats and vegetable oils are usually added to broiler diets to increase their energy content. However, several factors can affect lipids digestion, both related to the animal characteristics such as bird age, genetic strain, secretion and activity of digestive enzymes, and to the diet composition such as type of fat used as lipid supplement, ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids in the diet, presence of pentosans and dietary fiber. Within this reality, researches have been conducted to study the increased digestibility of oils and fats by emulsifying substances, such as bile salts and phospholipids. Lysophospholipid (LPL) is a more effective biosurfactant in emulsifying properties than bile salts and soy lecithin because one molecule in the hydrophobic tail is removed, indicating more stability in the aqueous environment of the gastrointestinal tract. Another action of lysophospholipids is related to the antibacterial effect. They may modify the biological structure of bacteria causing changes in membrane permeability, raising the speculation of a combined effect with organic acids on poultry gut health. The changes in membrane permeability by lysophospholipids may facilitate the ion dissociation of the organic acids inside the bacteria. In turn, the control of the intestinal microbiota through these additives could preserve the integrity of endogenous, consequently, the present study was designed to investigate the effects of dietary LPL supplementation in diets differing in fat on blood parameters, intestinal morphology, ceca microbiome and performance in broiler chicks.
Materials and Methods This experiment was performed in a completely randomized design based on factorial arrangement to evaluate the effect of lysophospholipid supplementation (0 and 0.25g/kg) in corn-soybean meal diets containing three fat sources (soybean oil, tallow and their blend 50: 50%) and each at two levels (1.5 and 3%) with 12 isocaleric and isonitrogenous starter diets. Each diet was fed to six replicates of 10 chicks each during 1 to 14 days of age. Performance traits, jejunal morphology, serum lipid composition, cecal microbial population of one chick from each replicate were measured at day 14.
Results and Discussion the interaction effects of lysophospholipid supplementation, fat source and fat level were not significant on broiler performance during 1 to 14 days of age, except for the lysophospholipid supplementation and fat level that was significant on feed intake in the starter period. Among the main effects only fat levels had a significant effect on body weight, body weight gain in the starter period, and 3% fat level compared to 1.5% improved body weight and body weight gain. These results are in agreement with zampiga et al, (2016) that demonstrated the addition of the lysophospholipid did not statistically improve final body weight and daily weight gain of broilers in the whole period of trial (0–42 d). These observations are partially in contrast with Melegy et al. (2010) who reported that the use of an emulsifier based on lysolecithin at the dosage of 0.25 or 0.5 kg/ton of feed significantly improved these productive parameters. Other factors may be affect on broiler performance such as inappropriate dose of lysophospholipid in diet, low energy levels of the experimental diets, use of 3 factors in the experimental design, and low bird population in each treatment that combined the effects. The Interaction effects of lysophospholipid supplementation, fat source and fat level were not significant on jejunal villus height, villus width, diameter of epithelium layer, crypt depth and villus height to crypt depth ratio. The interaction effects of lysophospholipid supplementation and fat levels in diet showed a significant effect on villus width. The effect of fat levels was significant for villus height and it increased by the use of 3% levels. The Interaction effect of lysophospholipid supplementation, fat source and fat level was not significant on the concentration of triglyceride, cholesterol, HDL and LDL in serum of broiler chicks. The interaction effect of lysophospholipid supplementation and fat level in diet was significant on the concentration of triglyceride level, and the interaction effect of lysophospholipid supplementation and fat source in diet was significant on LDL in serum lipid level of broiler chicks. The main effect of lysophospholipid supplementation was significant on the concentration of triglyceride, and also the effect of fat source was significant on cholesterol and HDL in serum of broiler chicks. The Interaction effects of lysophospholipid supplementation, fat source and fat level was not significant for lactobacillus and E-coli population in ceca. The main effect of lysophospholipid supplementation was significant increase on the lactobacillus population in ceca, and the effect of fat level in diet was significant decrease on the E-coli population in ceca.
Conclusion It can be concluded in this study that of lysophospholipids supplementation did not have a significant effect on performance in broiler chickens during the starter period.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Interaction
  • level
  • Source
  • Soybean oil and Tallow
Abbas, M. T., Arif, M., Saeed, M., Reyad-ul-Ferdous, M., Hassan, M. A., Arain, M. A., & Rehman, A. (2016). Emulsifier effect on fat utilization in broiler chicken. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 11,158-167. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2016.158.167.
2.Allahyari-Bake, S., & Jahanian, R. (2017). Effects of dietary fat source and supplemental lysophosphatidylcholine on performance, immune responses, and ileal nutrient digestibility in broilers fed corn/soybean meal- or corn/wheat/soybean meal-based diets. Poultry Science, 96, 1149-1158. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew330.
3.Al-Marzooqi, W., & Leeson, S. (1999). Evaluation of dietary supplements of lipase, detergent, and crude porcine pancreas on fat utilization by young broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 78, 1561-1566. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.11.1561.
4.Amerah, A. M., Ravindran, V., Lentle, R. G., & Thomas, D. G. (2007). Influence of feed particle size and feed form on the performance energy utilisation, digestive tract development, and digesta parameters of broiler starters. Poultry Science, 86, 2615–2623. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00212.
5.Arouri, A. & Mouritsen, O. G. (2013). Membrane-perturbing effect of fatty acids and lysolipids. Progress in Lipid Research, 52, 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2012.09.002.
6.Azman, M. A., & Ciftci, M. (2004). Effects of replacing dietary fat with lecithin on broiler chicken zootechnical performance. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire, 155, 445-448.
7.Blanch, A., Barroeta, A. C., Baucells, M. D., Serrano, X., & Puchal, F. (1996). Utilization of different fats and oils by adult chickens as a source of energy, lipid and fatty acids. Animal Feed Scicence and Technology, 61, 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00931-0.
8.Chen, C., Jung, B., & Kim, W. (2019). Effects of lysophospholipid on growth performance, carcass yield, intestinal development, and bone quality in broilers. Poultry Science, 98, 3902-3913. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez111.
9.Choct, M., & Annison, G. (1992). The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. British Journal of Nutrition, 67, 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19920014.
10.Coonrod, J. D., & Yoneda, K. (1983). Detection and partial characterization of antibacterial factor(s) in alveolar lining material of rats. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 71, 129-141.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110741
11.Crespo, N., & Esteve-Garcia, E. (2003). Polyunsaturated fatty acids reduce insulin and very low density lipoprotein levels in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 82, 1134-1139. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.7.1134.
12.Denbow, D. M. (2000). Gastrointestinal Anatomy and Physiology. Sturkie’s Avian Physiology. Academic Press, 343-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407160-5.00014-2.
13.Fascina, V., Carrijo, A., Souza, K., Garcia, A., Kiefer, C., & Sartori, J. R. (2009). Soybean oil and beef tallow in starter broiler diets. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 11, 249-56.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2009000400006.
14.Guban, J., Korver, D. R., Allison, G. E., & Tannock, G. W. (2006). Relationship of dietary antimicrobial drug administration with broiler performance, decreased population levels of Lactobacillus salivarius, and reduced bile salt deconjugation in the ileum of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 85, 2186-2194. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.12.2186.
15.Guerreiro Neto, A. C., Pezzato, A. C., Sartori, J. R., Mori, C., Cruz, V. C., Fascina, V. B., Pinheiro, D. F., Madeira, L. A., & Gon¸calvez, J. C. (2011). Emulsifier in broiler diets containing different fat sources. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 13, 119-125.
16.Hashemi, R. & Jafari Ahangari, Y. (2005). Blood Parameters in Poultry. First edition of the Publication Hammihanqom, Qom, Iran. 142p (In Persian)
17.Hosoyamada, Y., & Sakai, T. (2007). Mechanical components of rat intestinal villi as revealed by ultrastructural analysis with special reference to the axial smooth muscle cells in the villi. Archives of Histology Cytology, 70, 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1679/aohc.70.107.
18.Huyghebaert, G., Ducatelle, R., & Van Immerseel, F. (2011). An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. The Veterinary Journal, 187, 182-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.03.003.
19.Jamili, F., Shariatmadari, F., & Karimi Torshizi, A. (2013). Effect of lecithin and bile salt on yield, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Production. 15(2), 117-26. (In Persian)
20.Jimenez-Moreno, E., Gonzalez-Alvarado, J. M., Gonzalez-Serrano, A., Lazaro, R., & Mateos, G. G. (2009). Effect of dietary fiber and fat on performance and digestive traits of broilers from one to twenty-one days of age. Poultry Science, 88, 2562-2574. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00179.
21.Jones, D. B., Hancock, J. D., Harmon, D. L., & Walker, C. E. (1992). Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources on nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 70, 3473-3482. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113473x.
22.Joshi, A., Paratkar, S. G., & Thorat, B. N. (2006). Modification of lecithin by physical, chemical and enzymatic methods. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 108, 363-373.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200600016.
23.Katongole, J. B. D., & March, B. E. (1980). Fat utilization in relation to intestinal fatty acid binding protein and bile salts in chicks of different ages and different genetic sources. Poultry Science, 59, 819-827. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0590819.
24.Ketels, E., & De Groote, G. (1989). Effect of ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids of the dietary lipid fraction on utilization and metabolizable energy of added fats in young chicks. Poultry Science, 68, 1506-1512. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0681506.
25.Knarreborg, A., Engberg, R. M., Jensen, S. K., & Jensen, B. B. (2002). Quantitative determination of bile salt hydrolase activity in bacteria isolated from the small intestine of chickens. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 68, 6425- 6428.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.12.6425-6428.2002.
26.Kragdahl, A. S. (1985). Digestion and absorption of lipids in poultry. Journal of Nutrition, 102, 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/115.5.675.
27.Leeson, S., & Summers, J.D. (2001). Scott’s Nutrition of the Chicken, 4th ed. (Guelph, Ontario, University Books. 608p.
28.Maisonnier S, Gomez, J., Bree, A., Berri, C., Baeza, E., & Carre, B. (2003). Effects of microflora status, dietary bile salts and guar gum on lipid digestibility, intestinal bile salts, and histomorphology in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 82, 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.5.805.
29.Malapure, C. D., Kawitkar, S., Deshmukh, B. G. B., Bendale, L. N., & Patankar, R. B. (2011). Influence of dietary supplementation of phospholipids and lysophospholipids on performance of broilers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrtion, 28, 316-319.
30.Melegy, T., Khaled, N. F., El-Bana, R., & Abdellatif, H. (2010). Dietary fortification of a natural biosurfactant, lysolecithin in broiler. African Journal of Agricultureal Research, 5, 2886-2892.
Nir, I., Nitsan, Z., & Mahagna, M. (1993). Comparative growth and development of the digestive organs and of some enzymes in broiler and egg type chicks after hatching. British Poultey Science, 34, 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669308417607
31.Nitsan, Z., Ben-Avraham, G., Zoref, Z., & Nir, I. (1991). Growth and development of the digestive organs and some enzymes in broiler chicks after hatching. British Poultey Science, 32, 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417376
32.Neto, A .C. G., Pezzato, A. C., Sartori, J. R., Mori, C., Cruz, V. C., Fascina, V. B., Pinheiro, D. F., Madeira, L. A., & Goncalvez, J. C. (2011). Emulsifier in broiler diets containing different fat sources. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 13, 119-125.
33.Noy, Y., & Sklan, D. (1995). Digestion and absorption in the young chick. Poultry Science, 74, 366-373. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740366.
34.Polycarpo, G. V., Burbarelli, M. F. C., Carao, A. C. P., Merseguel, C. E. B., Dadalt, J. C., Maganha, S. R. L., Sousa, R. L. M., Cruz-Polycarpo, V. C., & Albuquerque, R. D. (2016). Effects of lipid sources, lysophospholipids and organic acids in maize-based broiler diets on nutrient balance, liver concentration of fat-soluble vitamins, jejunal microbiota and performance. British Poultry Science, 57, 788-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1219019.
35.Polin, D., Wing, T.L., Ki, P., & Pell, K. E. (1980). The effect of bile acids and lipase on absorption of tallow in young chicks. Poultry Science, 59, 2738-2743. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0592738.
36.Reynier, M. O., Lafont, H., Crotte, C., Sauve, P., & Gerolami, A. (1985). Intestinal cholesterol uptake: Comparison between mixed micelles containing lecithin or lysolecithin. Lipids, 20, 145-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02534246.
37.Roy, A., Haldar, S., Mondal, S., & Ghosh, T. P. (2010). Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens. Veterinary Medicine International, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/262604.
38.Salari, A., Golian, A., & Hassanabadi, A. (2020). Added value (matrix) of Lysophospholipids Supplementation on Metabolizable Energy of Different Fat Sources and Digestible Nutrients of Corn-Soybean Meal Diet in Broiler Chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 12(4), 513-528 (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/ijasr2022.38275.0.
39.Saleh, H., Rahimi, S., & Torshizi, M. A. K. (2009). The effect of diet that contained fish oil on performance, serum parameters, the immune system and the fatty acid composition of meat in broilers. International Journal of Vetentary Research, 3, 69-75.
40.Sobotik, E., Lee, J., Hagerman, S., & Archer, G. (2018). Evaluation of the use of phosphatidic acid in the diet on growth performance and breast meat yield in broilers. Animals, 8, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8060087.
41.Tancharoenrat, P., Ravindran, V., Zaefarian, F., & Ravidran, G. (2013). Influence of age on the apparent metabolisable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens. Animal of Feed Science and Technology, 186, 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013.
42.Tamblyn, K. C., & Conner, D. E. (1997). Bactericidal activity of organic acids in combination with transdermal compounds against Salmonella typhimurium attached to broiler skin. Food Microbiology, 14, 477-484. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1997.0112.
43.Upadhaya, S. D., Lee, J. S., Jung, K. J., & Kim, I. H. (2017). Influence of emulsifier blends having different hydrophilic-lipophilic balance value on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum lipid profiles, and meat quality of broilers. Poultry Science, 97, 255-261. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex303.
44.Van Nieuwenhuyzen, W., & Tomas, M. C. (2008). Update on vegetable lecithin and phospholipid technologies. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 110, 472-486. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200800041.
45.Xing, J. J., van Heugten, E., Li, D. F., Touchette, K. J., Coalson, J. A., Odgaard, R. L., & Odle, J. (2004). Effects of emulsification, fat encapsulation, and pelleting on weanling pig performance and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 2601-2609. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8292601x.
46.Yamauchi, K. (2002). Review on chicken intestinal villus histological alterations related with intestinal function. Poultry Science, 39, 229-242. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.39.229.
47.Zampiga, M., Meluzzi, A., & Sirri, F. (2016). Effect of dietary supplementation of lysophospholipids on productive performance, nutrient digestibility and carcass quality traits of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15, 521-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2016.1192965.
48.Zanganeh, S., Turki, Elihian M., & Abdolmohammadi, A. (2018). Effect of edible supplementation of lysophospholipids (lysolecitin) and vitamin C in the last period on yield, carcass characteristics and immune response of broilers under heat stress and normal temperature. Journal of Animal Science, 119, 155-68. (In Persian) 10.22092/ASJ.2017.115146.1516.
49.Zhang, B., Haitao, L., Zhao, D., Guo, Y., & Barri, A. (2011). Effect of fat type and lysophosphatidylcholine addition to broiler diets on performance, apparent digestibility of fatty acids, and apparent metabolizable energy content. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 163, 177- 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.10.004.
50.Zhao, P. Y., & Kim, H. (2017). Effect of diets with different energy and lysophospholipids levels on performance, nutrient metabolism, and body composition in broilers. Poultry Science, 96, 1341-1347. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew469.
51.Zhao, P. Y., Li, H. L., Hossain, M. M., & Kim, I. H. (2015). Effect of emulsifier (lysophospholipids) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profile in weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 207, 190-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.06.007.
52.Zuhri, M. A. (2010). Principles of poultry farming. University of Tehran Publications, 17th Edition, Tehran, Iran. 480p. (In Persian)
CAPTCHA Image