مقایسه منابع مختلف علوفه‌ای جیره بر عملکرد تولیدی، رفتار تغذیه‌ای و فراسنجه‌های خونی بزهای شیرده مورسیانوگرانادینا

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف از انجام این تحقیق، بررسی اثر استفاده از منابع مختلف علوفه ای بر عملکرد تولیدی، رفتار تغذیه ای، و فراسنجه های خونی بزهای شیرده مورسیانوگرانادینا بود. ۳۰ رأس بز شیرده در قالب طرح کاملا تصادفی با ۳ تیمار تغذیه ای مورد آزمایش قرار گرفتند. منابع مختلف علوفه ای شامل جیره­های حاوی کلش گندم، علف خشک یونجه و ذرت سیلو شده بود. خوراک­ها از نظر انرژی و پروتئین به صورت یکسان متوازن شدند. داده­ها به روش مدل­های مختلط و با استفاده از نرم افزار SAS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل آماری قرار گرفت. خوراک مصرفی در گروه های آزمایشی دارای تفاوت معنی دار بوده و در تیمار ذرت سیلو شده بالاترین و در گروه دارای کلش گندم کمترین بود. درصد چربی شیر در بزهای تغذیه شده با جیره حاوی علف یونجه به طور معنی­داری نسبت به جیره حاوی کلش گندم و ذرت سیلو شده افزایش یافت. تفاوت معنی­داری در رفتار تغذیه­ای، درصد پروتئین، لاکتوز، مواد جامد بدون چربی شیر و نیز درآمد مازاد بر هزینه خوراک بزها دیده نشد. فراسنجه­های خونی (گلوگز، آلبومین و اسید چرب غیر استریفیه شده) تحت تأثیر تیمارها قرار نگرفتند.  نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که بزهای مورسیانوگرانادینا قادر به استفاده از منابع علوفه ای در دسترس مانند کلش گندم  همانند علوفه مرسوم هستند و می توانند بدون اثر منفی بر شاخص های سلامتی، تولید اقتصادی داشته باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of different forage sources on feeding behavior, Milk production and blood parameters of Murciano-Granadina dairy goats

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohamad Hadi Khabbazan 1
  • Hamid Amanlou 2
  • Davood zahmatkesh 2
  • Ehsan Mahjoobi 2
1 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
2 Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction[1] Global demand for goat milk and its products has been growing. The decreased pasture quality has led goat producers to use intensive production systems with economical fodder resources. Goat milk contains functional compounds that enhance human immune system and overall health. Goat milk is enriched with functional peptides, conjugated linoleic acid, and healthy oligosaccharides that can immensely benefit human immunity and health. Goats are usually capable in utilizing lower quality forages. In few recent studies, alfalfa hay was compared with different by-products and local feeds with no significant effects found on rumen fermentation and milk production or composition. Murciano-Granadina goats were capable to utilize low quality fiber sources towards milk production.
The objective of this study was to determine effects of feeding various forage sources on milk production, nutritional behaviors, and blood parameters of Murciano-Granadina dairy goats in Iran.
 
Materials and Methods  Thirty second-parity Murciano-Granadina goats (190 ± 3 days in milk; 2 ± 0.03 kg/d milk yield) were used in a completely randomized design study with three treatments (10 goats per treatment). Treatments were diets containing 1) wheat straw (WS), 2) alfalfa hay (AH), or 3) corn silage (CS). To enable sound comparisons among forage sources, treatment diets were balanced to be isoenergetic and isonitrogenous. The concentrate portion of the rations was similarly ground for all treatments. Feed and milk (from a.m. and p.m. milking) samples were collected weekly for later analytical measurements. To determine goat behavior time; eating, ruminating, and resting times were observed and recorded by technical individuals on days 30 and 50 of the experiment in two 24-h period. Blood samples were taken at 0800 h on d 1, 30, and 56. The data were analyzed using mixed models of SAS program.
 
Results and Discussion  The dry matter intake (DMI) was significantly affected by treatments (P <0.001). Body weight and its changes were similar among treatments, suggesting that nutrient partitioning towards tissue accretion or depletion was not different among treatments during the study, since goats were in late lactation. However, DMI was 228 g higher for goats received diet containing corn silage than for those received AH (P < 0.05). Decreased DMI for diets with wheat straw and alfalfa hay compared with corn silage could at least partially be related to increased dietary fat and indigestible cell wall in the former diets. Ruminating, standing, and resting times were not different among treatments (P > 0.10). These data would suggest that despite the differences in forage nutritional characteristics, digestibility, and intake, ruminating time was similar among treatments.
Goats fed CS had higher milk production than the other two groups (P <0.001). The percentage of milk fat in the alfalfa hay treatment was higher than in the other treatments (p> 0.05). Similar to milk volume, daily yields of milk protein, lactose, and total solids were also higher for corn silage than for other treatments. This could be a result of increased milk volume and unchanged milk contents of protein and lactose for corn silage. Milk fat content was higher (P < 0.01) for AH treatment but milk fat yield tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for CS treatments than for other treatments.
Serum concentration of glucose, albumin and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were not significant among experimental treatments. Glucose and NEFA values are usually interpreted as indices for energy status of experimental animals. Similar glucose and NEFE concentrations in blood for the three forage treatments could be evaluated in light of the fact that goats were in mid and late lactation and thus were not in negative energy balance. As a result, they may have not been metabolically sensitive enough to respond to treatments at this stage of lactation. Serum concentrations of total proteins were higher for AH than for other treatments (P < 0.05).
Findings of this study suggest that lactating Murciano-Granadina goats are capable to utilize different forage sources including alfalfa hay, corn silage and wheat straw. However, corn silage leads to higher raw and fat-corrected milk yields, whereas alfalfa hay increases milk fat content. For higher feed efficiency and lower feed cost and where more available, Wheat Straw may be used in Murciano-Granadina goat diets. To improve milk yield and fat content and yield simultaneously, certain combinations of alfalfa hay and corn silage may be required. Determining this will require future experimentation. Future experiments could also investigate forage choice effects on milk fatty acids profile and other functional compounds.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Blood Parameter
  • Feeding Behavior
  • Goat
  • Milk
  • Murciano-Granadina
  1. Allen, S. 2000. Effects of diet on short-term regulation of feed intake by lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 83:1598–1624.
  2. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 2002. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th AOAC International, Gaithersburg, DC.
  3. Askar, A. R., M. S. Nassar, H. S. Badawy, E. Y. Eid, J. A. Guada, and M. F. A. Farid. 2016. Recovered energy and efficiency of digestion in sheep and goats fed Atriplex nummularia compared to alfalfa hay. Livestock Science, 194: 1–6.
  4. Carol Delancy, M. 2018. Thinking outside the box: Innovative solutions for dairy goat management. Small Ruminant Research, 163: 39–44.
  5. Casamassima, D., M. Palazzo, and R. Pizzo. 2007. Evaluation of milk production and some bood parameters in lactating autochthonous goat extensively reared in Molise region. Italian Jornal of Animal Science, 6: 615-617.
  6. Clark, S., and M. B. García, 2017. A 100-year review: Advances in goat milk research. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(12): 10026–10044.
  7. Criscioni, P and C. Fernandez. 2016. Effect of rice bran as a replacement for oat grain in energy and nitrogen balance, methane emissions, and milk performance of Murciano-Granadina goats. Jornal of Dairy Science, 99: 1–11
  8. Desnatie, R., R. M., Byeng, G., Nar, M., Wendell, H. L., Jung, S., Sandra, and B.Olga, 2020. Influence of tannin-rich pine bark supplementation in the grain mixes for meat goats: Growth performance, blood metabolites, and carcass characteristics. Animal Nutrition, 6: 85-91.
  9. El-Meccawi, S., M., Kam, , A., Brosha. and A. Degen, 2009. Energy intake, heat production and energy and nitrogen balances of sheep and goats fed wheat straw as a sole diet. Livestock Science, 125: 88–91.
  10. Evan, T. de., M., Dolores Carro, J. E., Fernandez Yapez, A., Haro, L., Arbesu, M., Romero-Huelva, and Molina-Alcaide, 2020. Effects of Feeding Multinutrient Blocks Including Avocado Pulp and Peels to Dairy Goats on Feed Intake and Milk Yield and Composition. Animals, 10:2-12.
  11. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2011. Crop prospects and food situation, No. 4, December 2011. Accessed Mar. 13, 2017.
  12. Fernández, , I., Pérez-Baena, j.v., Marti, j.l., Palomares, and j.v.Segarra. 2019. Use of orange leaves as a replacement for alfalfa in energy and nitrogen partitioning, methane emissions and milk performance of murciano-granadina goats., Animal Feed Science and Technology, 247: 103-111.
  13. Leiber, F., M. , D Kreuzer. , H. R. NiggWettstein, and M. R. Leo Scheeder. 2005. A study on the causes for the elevated n-3 fatty acids in cows’ milk of alpine origin. Lipids 40:191–202.
  14. Lu, C. D., J. R. Kawas, and O. G. Mahgoub, 2005. Fibre digestion and utilization in goats. Small Ruminant Research, 60:45–52
  15. Marcos, C. N., M. D.,Carro, J. E., Fernandes, A., Haro, M., Romero-Huelva, and M. Molina-Alcaide,. 2020. Effects of agroindustrial by-product supplementation on dairy goat milk characteristics, nutrient utilization, ruminal fermentation, and methane production. Journal of Dairy Science, 103: 1472-1483.
  16. Reid, R.L., G.A., Jung, J. M., Cox-Ganser, B.F.,Rybeck, and E.C. Townsend, 1990. Comparative utilization of warm- and cool-season forages by cattle, sheep and goats. Jornal of Animal Science, 68: 2986–2994.
  17. Romero-Huelva, M, M. A., Ramirez-Fenosa, R, Planelles-Gonzales, R., Planelles-Gonzales, and Garcia-casodo, 2017. Can by-products replace conventional ingredients in concentrate of dairy goat diet?. Jornal of  Dairy Science, 100:1–13
  18. Sahlu, T., S. P., Hart, and J. M. Fernandez. 1993. Nitrogen metabolism and blood metabolites in three goat breeds fed increasing amounts of protein increasing amounts of protein. Small Ruminant Research, 10: 281- 292.
  19. Sanz Sampelayo, M. R., L., Perez, J. J, Martin Alonso, L., Amigo, and J. Boza, 2002. Effects of concentrates with different contents of protected fat rich in PUFAs on the performance lactating Granadina goats Part II. Milk production and composition. Small Ruminant Research, 43: 141-148 .
  20. Sanz Sampelayo, M. R., Y.,Chilliard, Ph., Schmidely, and J. Boza, 2007. Influence of type of diet on the fat constituents of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research, 68: 42–63
  21. Sarah, C., L.M., Carmen M., Massimo De P., Pasquale De C., Salvatore M., Aristide C., Giuseppe R., Domentico F., Annunziata p., Giuseppina and N.Gianluca, 2019. Autochthonous dairy goat breeds showed better milk quality than Saanen under the same environmental conditions. Archives. Anim. Breed., 62: 83–89,
  22. Schultz, E. B., Amaral, R. M. do, Gloria, L. S., Silva, F. F. e, Rodrigues, M. T., and Vieira, R. A. M. 2019. Ingestive behavior of dairy goats fed diets containing increasing levels of neutral detergent fiber and particle size using multivariate analysis. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 41(1), e45870
  23. Silvani, V., D.,Adriana, and   P. Elane, 2019. Functionality of the components from goat’s milk, recent advances for T functional dairy products development and its implications on human health. Journal of Functional Foods, 52:243-257
  24. Vacca, G. M., G., Stocco, M.L., Dettori, A., Summer, C., Cipolat-Gotet, G., Bittante, and Pazzola, 2018. Cheese yield, cheese making efficiency, and daily production of 6 breeds of goats. Jornal of Dairy Science, 101:7817–7832
  25. Vansoest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysacharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74:35-83.
  26. Vasta, V., A. Nudda, A. Cannas, M. Lanza, and A. Priolo. (2008). Alter- native feed resources and their effects on the quality of meat and milk from small ruminants. Animal Feed Science. Technol, 147:223–246.
  27. Whitney TR, JL,Glasscock JP,Muir WC,Stewart and Scholljegerdes 2017. Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters. Journal of Animal Science, 95:4150e63.
CAPTCHA Image