اثر پروبیوتیک و پری‌بیوتیک بر سامانه آنتی‌اکسیدانی، سیستم ایمنی، آنزیم‌های کبدی و برخی فراسنجه‌های خون جوجه‌های گوشتی رأس 308 تحت تنش گرمایی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- فیزیولوژی

نویسندگان

1 بیرجند

2 دانشگاه بیرجند

3 دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

این آزمایش به منظور مقایسه اثر سطوح مختلف پروبیوتیک و پری‌بیوتیک در جیره جوجه‌های گوشتی بر سیستم آنتی‌اکسیدانی، سیستم ایمنی، فعالیت آنزیم‌های کبدی و برخی فراسنجه‌های خون در شرایط تنش گرمایی انجام شد. به این منظور 256 قطعه جوجه گوشتی از سویه رأس ٣٠٨ در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی به صورت فاکتوریل ٢×۴ با ٨ تیمار و ۴ تکرار 8 قطعه‌ای مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. جوجه‌ها با دو سطح پروبیوتیک (صفر و 01/0) و چهار سطح پری‌‌بیوتیک (صفر، 025/0 ، 050/0 و 075/0 ) از سن 29 تا 42 روزگی تغذیه شدند. نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد که مکمل کردن پروبیوتیک در جیره باعث افزایش معنی‌داری در مقدار گلوکز، منیزیم و IgG و کاهش معنی‌داری در میزان گلوبولین شد. استفاده هم‌زمان از پروبیوتیک و پری‌بیوتیک در سطوح 050/0 و 075/0 درصد جیره باعث افزایش معنی‌دار در میزان گلوکز، در سطح 050/0 درصد جیره باعث افزایش معنی‌داری در میزان فعالیت آنزیم GSH-Px و IgG و در سطح 075/0 درصد جیره باعث افزایش معنی‌دار در میزان تولید آنتی بادی بر علیه SRBC شد. بنابراین در مجموع می‌توان استنتاج نمود که استفاده هم‌زمان از 01/0 درصد پروبیوتیک و 050/0 و 075/0 درصد پری‌بیوتیک در جیره، ممکن است در تعدیل فراسنجه‌های خونی، تقویت سیستم ایمنی و بهبود سیستم آنتی اکسیدانی در جوجه‌های گوشتی تحت تنش گرمایی ممکن است مؤثر واقع شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Probiotic and Prebiotic on Antioxidant system, Immune system, Liver enzymes activity and some Blood Parameters in Ross 308 Broiler Chickens under Heat Stress

نویسندگان [English]

  • ali ghorbani 1
  • hadi sarir 2
  • nazar afzali 2
  • hamed kerrmani moakhar 3
1 birjand
2 the university of birjand
3 the university of Tehran
چکیده [English]

Introduction Heat stress is one of the environmental stresses in summer. It was showed that decrease digestibility nutrient and impair the function of immune and antioxidant system. Several methods have been suggested to reduce the negative effects of heat stress in broiler chickens including: supplemented antibiotic, probiotic and prebiotic in the various levels of diets. However, extensive usage of antibiotics will cause the increasing resistance of pathogens to antibiotics and the accumulation of antibiotics remain in animal products and the environment. It is becoming increasingly evident that to achieve the aims above and to reduce the use of antibiotics significantly, it is necessary to combine of intervention strategies such as genetic selection of resistant animals, elimination of pathogens from feed and water, vaccinations, and applications of suitable feed and water additives. On the other hand, it was showed that probiotic and prebiotic additives improve the function of immune and antioxidant system. However, to our knowledge, information is lacking on the effects of simultaneous using probiotic and prebiotic on broiler antioxidant and immune system. This experiment was conducted to compare the effect of different levels of probiotic and prebiotic on antioxidant system, immune system, liver enzymes activity and some blood parameters under heat stress in broilers chickens.
Material and Methods Two hundred and fifty six broiler chickens (Ross 308) were used in a completely randomized design with a 4×2 factorial arrangement of treatments and four replicates with 8 chickens in each. Broiler chickens were fed with 2 levels of probiotic (0 and 0.01) % and 4 levels of prebiotic compound (0, 0.025, 0.050 and 0.075) % diet during 29- 42 days of age. Blood sample was collected in order to measure the serum concentration of metabolites (glucose, total protein, globulin and albumin), minerals (Fe, Mg, Ca and P), liver enzymes activity (ALP, ALT, AST), antioxidant system (SOD, GSH-px) and immune system (IgG, IgM). Data from the experiment were analyzed by mixed model procedure of SAS. Cage was the experimental unit. We considered P < 0.05 to be statistically significant. Differences among means were tested by the Tukey method.
Results and Discussion During the past decade, some studies have supported the potential health benefits of probiotics, such as improved gastrointestinal microbiota ecosystems, stimulation of the immunological system, anticarcinogenic activities, and reduced oxidative stress. The results of present study indicated that supplemented probiotic in diet was significantly increased the serum concentration of glucose, magnesium and IgG and decreased globulin. The results of several other studies similarly confirmed that treatment of animals with probiotics increase the serum concentration of glucose and reduce or no effect on the serum concentration of albumin, globulin and total protein in broiler chickens. The results this study also showed that treatment of animals with the different levels of prebiotic was caused insignificant change in the serum concentration of metabolites and minerals. Of course, simultaneous using of 0.01% probiotic and prebiotic in the levels of 0.05% and 0.075 % diet was caused to increase of serum glucose significantly. Adding probiotics and prebiotics and their interactions in the diet has insignificant effect on the enzyme activity of serum ALT and ALP broiler chickens under heat stress. Few studies were conducted as to the interaction effect of probiotics and prebiotics on immune and antioxidant system. The results of this experiment showed that addition of 0.01% probiotic and prebiotic in the level of 0.05 % to diet was caused significant increase the enzyme activity of GSH-px. Furthermore, treatment of 0.01% probiotic and prebiotic in the level of 0.075% to diet was caused significant increase the antibodies production against SRBC. The results of previous studies have been showed that the function of immune and antioxidant system impair under heat stress. On the other hand, in agreement with present results, it was indicated that probiotics and prebiotics increase GSH-px and IgG and the antibodies production against SRBC. Thus, both the present experiment and the other reports indicate that dietary supplementation of probiotic and prebiotic improve the immune and antioxidant system of broilers and could be as an alternative to antibiotics
Conclusion In general, by the results of present study, it can be concluded that supplemented probiotic invidually in diet significantly increase the serum concentration of glucose, magnesium and IgG and decreased globulin. Furthermore, using of 0.01% probiotic and 0.05% and/or 0.075% prebiotic in diet indicated that probiotic and synbiotic, can improve the blood parameters, antioxidant system and immune system in broiler chickens under the heat stress.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broiler Chickens
  • Glutathione peroxidase
  • Heat stress
  • Imminoglubollin G
  • Liver enzymes
1- Safary Samani, A., and A. Akbari Samani. 2013. Stuyding the effect of probiotic on immunity response and growth performance of broiler chicken. Journal of Animal Biology, 29: 45-49. (In Persian).
2- Abd-Aljaleel, R. A. and G. A. M. Al-Kassie. 2007. Effect of adding Galli acid and Iraq probiotic on some physiological properties and intestinal microflora in Broiler chicks. Pages 102-115 in Scientific Conference Veterinary Medical College, University of Baghdad.
3- Abd-El-Rahman, H., H. Kamel., M. Walaa., S. H. Ahmed Olfat, and H. Amira. 2012. Effect of Bactrocell and Revitilyte-Plus as probiotic food supplements on the growth performance, hematological, biochemical parameters and humeral immune response of broiler chickens. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18: 305-316.
4- Al-Kassie, G. A. M. and R. A. Abd-Aljaleel. 2008. Effect of probiotic (Aspergillus niger) and prebiotic (Taraxacum officinale) on blood picture and biochemical properties of broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 7(12): 1182-1184.
5- Amaretti, A., M. di Nunzio., A. Pompei., S. Raimondi., M. Rossi, and A. Bordoni. 2013. Antioxidant properties of potentially probiotic bacteria: In vitro and in vivo activities. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology, 97:809–817.
6- Cross, M. L. 2002. Microbes versus microbes: immune signals generated by probiotic lactobacilli and their role in protection against microbial pathogens. FEMS Inmunology and Medical Microbiology, 34: 245-253.
7- Collet, S. 2000. Nutricao, imunidade e produtividade. Pages 20-30 in Ronda Latino-Americana Alltech: O future da alimentacao. Alltech Biotechnology, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
8- Coudray, C., C. Demigne, and Y. Rayssiguier. 2003. Effect of dietary fibers synbiotic on magnesium absorption in animals and humans. Nutrition, 133: 1-4.
9- Djouvinov, D., S. Boichera., T. Simeonova, and T. Vlaikova. 2005. Effect of feeding lactina probiotic on performance, some blood parameters and caecal microflora of male ducklings. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 3: 22-28.
10- Erdogan, Z., S. Erdogan, and O. Aslantaş. 2010. Effects of dietary supplementation of synbiotics and phytobiotics on performance, caecal coliform population and some oxidant/antioxidant parameters of broilers. Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 95(5): 40-48.
11- Fernandez, A., C. Lare., A. loste., S. Calvo, and M. C. Marca. 2001. Non-challenged of salmonella entiridis phage type 4 experimental infection by fosfomycin in newly hatched chicks. Comparative immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 24 (4): 207-216.
12- Fuller, R. 1973. Ecological studies on the lactobacillus flora associated with the crop epithelium of the fowl. Appiled Bacteriology, 36: 131–139.
13- Hanan, A., H. A. Hassan, and M. S. Ragab. 2007. The productive performance and egg quality of laying hens under the effect of dietary fenugreek seeds (ungerminated and germinated) and different dietary protein levels. 1-14
14- Hashemzadeh, F., S. Rahimi., M. A. Karimi-Torshizi, and A. A. Masoudi. 2013. Effects of probiotics and antibiotic supplementation on serum biochemistry and intestinal microflora in broiler chicks. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5(20): 2394-2398.
15- Hooge, D. M. 2004. Meta-analysis of broiler chicken pen trials evaluating dietary mannan Oligosaccharide. Poultry Science, 3: 163-174.
16- Kabir, S. M. L., M. M. Rahman., M. B. Rahman, and S. U. Ahmed. 2004. The Dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. Poultry Science, 3(5): 361-364.
17- Lin, H., C. H. Jiao., J. Buyse, and E. Decuypere. 2006. Strategies for preventing heat stress in poultry. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62: 71-85.
18- Liao, X. D., G. Ma., J. Cai., Y. Fu., X. Y. Yan., X. B. Wei, and R. J. Zhang. 2015. Effects of Clostridium butyricum on growth performance, antioxidation, and immune function of broilers. Poultry Science, 94: 662–667.
19- Lotfan, M., Y. Ebrahimnejad., K. Nazer, and M. Moghaddam. 2010. Effect of different sources and levels of prebiotic on blood metabolites, bone ash of toe and small intestine morphology of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 4(1): 20-31. (In Persian).
20- Luseba, D. 2013. Effects of sodium selenite and chromium sulphate as metabolic modifiers on stress alleviation, performance and liver mineral contents of feedlot Bonsmara cross steers. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(47): 6012-6020
21- Marai, I. F. M., A. A. EI-Darawany., A. M. Fadiel, and A. M. Abdel-Hafez. 2007. Physiological traits as affected by heat stress in sheep- A review. Small Ruminant Research, 71: 1-12.
22- Martarelli, D., M. C. Verdenelli., S. Scuri., M. Cocchioni., S. Silvi., C. Cecchini, and P. Pompei. 2011. Effect of a probiotic intake on oxidant and antioxidant parameters in plasma of athletes during intense exercise training. Current Microbiology, 62: 1689–1696.
23- Mehri, M., A. Zare, and A. Sami. 2009. Effects of probiotics and whey powder on broiler performance. Pages 452-455 in Second Proceedings of the Congress of Animal Science and Aquaculture Country. Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj. (In Persian).
24- Mohammadian, A., S. Mahdizadeh., H. Lotfelahian, and H. Norouzian. 2010. Effect of different levels of probiotics on laying performance and immune system. Iranian Journal of Animal Science and Research, 7: 72-65. (In Persian).
25- Nikpiran, H., M. Taghavi, A. Khodadadi, and S. S. H. Athari. 2013. Influence of Probiotic and Prebiotic on broiler chickens performance and immune status. Novel Applied Sciences, 2(8): 2322-5149.
26- Panda, A. K., M. R. Reddy., S. V. Rama-Rao., M. V. Raju, and N. K. Paraharaj. 2000. Growth, carcass characteristics, immunocomponence and response to Escherchia coli of broiler fed diets with various level of probiotic. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 64: 152-156.
27- Piray, A. H., Kermanshahi, H., Tahmasbi, A. M and Bahrampour, J. 2007. Effect of fecal culture and Aspergillus meal prebiotic (Fermcto) on growth performance and organ weights of broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6(5): 340-344.
28- Rahimi, S. and A. Khaksefidi. 2006. A comparison between the effects of a probiotic (bioplus 2B) and antibiotic (virginamycin) on the performance of broiler chickens under heat stress condition. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 7(3): 23-28. (In Persian).
29- Safamehr, A., H. A. Asgharzadih, and M. H. Shahir. 2011. Effect of different levels of protein and probiotics on performance, internal organs weight and biochemical parameters of blood broiler chickens. Bangladesh Journal of Vetrinery Medeciane, 2(1): 39-43.
30- Sahin, T., I. Kaya, and A. Elmali. 2008. Dietary supplementation of probiotic and prebiotic combination (combiotics) on performance, carcass quality and blood parameters in growing quails. Animal and Veterinary Advance, 7 (11): 1370-1373.
31- Santin, E., A. Maiorka., W. J. C. Polveiro., A. C. Paulillo., A. C. Laurentiz., S. A. Borges, and A. V. Fischer da Silva. 2003. Effect of environmental temperature on immune response of broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 12: 247-250.
32- Santoso, U., K. Tanaka, and S. Ohtani. 1955. Effect of trial Bacillus subtilis culture on growth, body composition and hepatic lipogenic enzyme activity in female broiler chicks. British Nutrition, 74: 523-529.
33- Savage, T. F., P. F. Cotter, and E. I. Zakrewska. 1996. Effect of feeding a mannanoligosaccharide on immunoglobulin, plasma IgG and bile IgA of Wrolstad MW male turkey. Poultry Science, 75:143.
34- Song, Z. F., T. X. Wu., L. S. Cai., L. J. Zhang, and X. D. Zheng. 2006. Effects of dietary supplementation with Clostridium butyricum on the growth performance and humoral immune response in Miichthys miiuy. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 7: 596–602.
35- Spring, P., C. Wenk., K. A. Dawson, and K. E. Newman. 2000. The effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 79: 205-211.
36- Truusalu, K., P. Naaber., T. Kullisaar., H. Tamm., R.-H. Mikelsaar., K. Zilmer., A. Rehema., M. Zilmer, and M. Mikelsaar. 2004. The influence of antibacterial and antioxidative probiotic Lactobacilli on gut mucosa in a mouse model of Salmonella infection. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 16: 180–187.
37- Yang, C. M., G. T. Cao., P. R. Ferket., T. T. Liu., L. Zhou., L. Zhang., Y. P. Xiao, and A. G. Chen. 2012. Effects of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune function, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 91: 2121–2129
38- Zulkifli, I., R. T. Dass, and T. Che Norma. 1999. Acute heat-stress effects on physiology and fear-related behaviour in red jungle fowl and domestic fowl. Animal Science, 38: 159-255.
39- Zyaie, H., M. A. Karimi Tarshizi., M. Bashtany., H. Nayimipoor, and A. Zeinali. 2010. Effects of alternative antimicrobial agents on humoral immune response and some parameters of blood serum of broiler chickens. Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, 16(2):142-152.