The Effect of Adding Different Levels of Wheat Straw to Paulownia (Paulownia sp.) Leaf Silage on the Chemical Composition and in vitro Fermentation Indices

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University

2 Animal Science Research Department, Safiabad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extention (AREEO), Dezful, Iran

3 Animal Science Research Department, Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extention (AREEO), Ahvaz, Iran

4 Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: The lack of water resources and the high water requirements of common forage plants have created significant limitations in the production of good quality forage in the country. Therefore, it is very important to identify and properly use new forage sources for inclusion in ruminant nutrition. A new fodder source must not only be fast-growing and resistant to hot and drought conditions, but also have acceptable nutritional value. Plants of the Paulowniaceae family in China and East Asia are a notable source of fodder in this regard. Several types of Paulownia are known in the world. These plants are known for their high growth rate and intense photosynthesis, which are specific to C4 plants, and with wide leaves with a diameter of about 90 cm. The commercial production of Paulownia wood produces a large mass of leaves, which are usually used as natural fertilizers. At the age of about 6 to 8 years, the leaf production of each Paulownia tree reaches about 100 kg. When the leaves have a favorable nutritional value, they can be used as fodder in feeding ruminants. In Iran, about 20 million tons of wheat straw (WS) are produced annually, a large part of which is used as the main source of animal feed. However, the nutritional value of these by-products is very low. Wheat straw is deficient in crude protein (CP), mineral elements, and digestible energy, and has low palatability. Considering the large amount of WS produced in the country, and in order to optimize the dry matter (DM) content of silage and prevent wastes from it, it seems that silage with appropriate characteristics and nutritional value can be produced using a mixture of fresh Paulownia leaves (PL) and WS. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine the nutritional value of PL and then to investigate the effects of adding different levels of WS to PL silage on chemical composition, gas production parameters, digestibility and fermentation parameters in vitro.
Material and Methods: Paulownia leaves (Tebjoo hybrid variety) and wheat straw (WS) were first collected and analyzed for their chemical composition using standard methods. Subsequently, both forages were chopped into 2–4 cm pieces using a hand chopper to prepare them for silage. Experimental treatments included adding WS at levels 0 (PL silage only), 6, 12, 18, and 24% to PL on DM basis. The materials were compacted in the plastic containers and the silage period lasted two months. Determination of chemical composition of fresh fodders and the nutritional value of experimental silages including chemical composition, in vitro gas production and fermentation parameters, digestibility and enzyme activity were carried out.
Results and Discussion: Results showed that DM, organic matter (OM), CP, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), ether extract (EE), lignin and non-fibrer carbohydrates (NFC) content of fresh PL were 266, 911, 173, 402, 201, 35.5, 75.5 and 301 g/kg DM, respectively. The mentioned chemical composition in PL silage were 273, 896, 168, 394, 191, 36.8, 74.6 and 297 g/kg DM, respectively. With increasing the level of WS in PL silage content of DM, NDF, ADF, lignin and pH increased linearly (P<0.05), although CP and NFC content and ammonia-N concentration of silage decreased linearly (P<0.05). The OM and ether extract content of the experimental silages were not affected (P<0.05). With increasing the level of WS in PL silage, gas production at all investigated times, gas production potential (coefficient b), short-chain volatile fatty acids, DM and OM digestibility, estimated metabolizable energy, ammonia-N and microbial protein synthesis decreased linearly (P<0.05), but the gas production rate (coefficient c) was not affected (P<0.05). With increasing WS to PL silage, the activities of carboxymethyl cellulase, filter paper degradation activity, alpha-amylase and protease activity the culture medium decreased linearly (P<0.05), although microcrystalline cellulase enzymes activity was not affected (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The current study indicated that fresh or ensiled Paulownia leaves (Tebjoo hybrid variety) has a significant nutritional value as a new forage source for use in ruminant nutrition. Moreover, adding different levels of wheat straw to paulownia leaf silage is recommended as a method of enrichment and improving the palatability and nutritional value of wheat straw.

Keywords

Main Subjects

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

References

  1. Agarwal, N. (2000). Estimation of fiber degrading enzyme. In: L. C. Chaudhary, N. Agarwal, D. N. Kamra, D. K. Agarwal, (Eds). Feed microbiology. Izatnagar (India): CAS Animal Nutrition, 278–291.
  2. Al-Sagheer, A. A., Abd El-Hack, M. A., Alagawany, M., Naiel, M. A., Mahgoub, S. A., Badr, M. M., Hussein, E. O. S., Alowaimer, A. N., & Swelum, A. A. (2019). Paulownia leaves as a new feed resource: chemical composition and effects on growth, carcasses, digestibility, blood biochemistry, and intestinal bacterial populations of growing rabbits. Animals, 9, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030095
  3. (2018). ANKOM Gas Production System Operator’s Manual; ANKOM Technology: Macedon, NY, USA.
  4. (2002). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (17th Ed., 1th rev.). Gaithersburg (MD): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
  5. Arora, J. K., Kakkar, V. K., Sukhvir, K., & Kaur, S. (1994). Bioconversion of agro residues for food and feed. Agricultural Revolution Karnal, 15, 3-4. https://doi.org/1371/journal.pone.0273916
  6. Azizi, A. (2024). Chemical composition, digestibility and in vitro fermentation variables of mixed silage from different levels of Paulownia leaves and forage corn. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 16(2), 157-170. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/ijasr.2023.83509.1161  
  7. Azizi-Shotorkhoft, A., Rezaei, J., & Fazaeli, H. (2013). The effect of different levels of molasses on the digestibility, rumen parameters and blood metabolites in sheep fed processed broiler litter. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 179, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2012.12.001
  8. Blümmel, M., Karsli, A., & Russell J. R. (2003). Influence of diet on growth yields of rumen micro-organisms in vitro and in vivo: Influence on growth yield of variable carbon fluxes to fermentation products. British Journal of Nutrition, 90, 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2003934
  9. Blümmel, M., Steingss, H., & Becker, K. (1997). The relationship between in vitro gas production, in vitro microbial biomass yield and 15N incorporation and its implications for the prediction of voluntary feed intake of roughages. British Journal of Nutrition, 77, 911–921. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970089
  10. Bodnar, A., Pajor, F., Steier, J., Kispal, T., & Poti, P. (2014). Nutritive value of paulownia (Paulownia) hybrid tree leaves. Hungarian Agricultural Research, 23, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030095
  11. Broderick, G., & Kang, J. H. (1980). Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Dairy Science, 63, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
  12. Descals, P., Seradj, A., Villorbina, G., & Balcells, J. (2013). Estudiodel valor nutritio de la hoja de Paulownia como recursoforrajero. AIDA, XV Jornadas sobre Producciуn Animal, TomoI, pp. 240-242 (E).
  13. Faithfull, N. T. (2000). Methods in Agricultural Chemical Analysis; A Practical Handbook. Cab Int., Wallingford, UK.
  14. García-Morote, F. A., L´opez-Serrano, F. R., Martínez-García, E., Andr´es-Abell´an, M., Dadi, T., Candel, D., Rubio, E., & Lucas-Borja, M. E. (2014). Stem biomass production of Paulownia elongata × fortunei under low irrigation in a semi-arid environment. Forests, 5, 2505–2520. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5102505
  15. Getachew, G., Makkar, H. P. S., & Becker, K. (2002). Tropical browses: Contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationshipbetween short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. Journal of Agricultural Science, 139, 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859602002393
  16. Huang, H., Lechniak, D., Szumacher‑Strabel, M., Patra, A. K., Kozłowska, M., Kolodziejski, P., Gao, M., Ślusarczyk, S., Petrič, D., & Cieslak, A. (2022). The effect of ensiled paulownia leaves in a high‑forage diet on ruminal fermentation, methane production, fatty acid composition, and milk production performance of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 13, 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-022-00745-9
  17. Huang, H., Szumacher-Strabel, M., Patra, A. K., ´Slusarczyk, S., Lechniak, D., Vazirigohar, M., Varadyova, Z., Kozłowska, M., & Cie´slak, A. (2021). Chemical and phytochemical composition, in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane production, and nutrient degradability of fresh and ensiled Paulownia hybrid leaves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 279, 115038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115038
  18. Icka, P., Damo, R., & Icka, E. (2016). Paulownia tomentosa, a fast growing timber. Annals Valahia University of Targoviste Agriculture, 10, 14–9. https:// doi. org/10.1515/agr-​2016-​0003
  19. Kaiser, A. G., Piltz, J. W., Burn, H. M., & Grinffiths, N. W. (2004). Successful Silage, 2nd ed. Dairy Australia and NSW Dept. of Primary Industries, New South Wales, Australia.
  20. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin-phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
  21. Marten, G. C., & Barnes, R. F. (1980). Prediction of energy digestibility of forages within vitro rumen fermentation and fungal enzymes systems. In: W. J. Pidgen, C. C. Balch, & M. Graham (Eds). Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feeds. International Development Research Center, Ottawa, pp. 61-71.
  22. McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., Sinclair, L. A., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2011). Animal Nutrition. 5th Ed. Prentice Hall, Essex, UK.
  23. Menke, K. H., & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28, 7–55.
  24. Mertens, D. R. (2002). Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds using refluxing in beakers or crucibles; collaborative study. Journal AOAC International, 85, 1217-1240.
  25. Miller, J. L. (1959). Modified DNS method for reducing sugars. Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426–429.
  26. Norton, B. W. (1998). The nutritive value of tree legumes. In: R. C. Gutteridge & H. M. Sheton (Eds). Forage Tree Legumes in Tropical Agriculture. Tropical Grassland Society Aus. Inc., St Lucia. Queensland, Australia, pp. 15-48.
  27. (2007). National Research Council, Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington (DC, USA): National Academy of Sciences.
  28. Özelçam, H., İpçak, H. H., Özüretmen, S., & Canbolat, Ö. (2012). Feed value of dried and ensiled paulownia (Paulownia) leaves and their relationship to rumen fermentation, in vitro digestibility, and gas production characteristics. Revista Brasileiro de Zootecnia, 50, e20210057. https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020210057
  29. Raghuvansi, S. K. S., Prasad, R., Tripathi, M. K., & Mishra, A. S. (2007). Effect of complete feed blocks or grazing and supplementation of lambs on performance, nutrient utilization, and rumen fermentation and rumen microbial enzymes. Animal, 1, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107284058
  30. , J., Rouzbehan, Y., & Fazaeli, H. (2009). Nutritive value of fresh and ensiled amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) treated with different levels of molasses. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 151, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.12.001
  31. SAS Institute Inc. (2005). User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.0 Edition. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
  32. Stewart, M., Vaidya, B., Mahapatra, A., Terrill, T., & Joshee, N. (2018). Potential use of multipurpose Paulownia elongata tree as an animal feed resource. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 1212-1227. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.96090
  33. Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Ed. Cornell Universuty Press, Itacha, NY, USA, pp. 476.
  34. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  35. Vercoe, P. E., Makkar, H. P. S., & Schlink, A. C. (2010). In vitro screening of plant resources for extra-nutritionalattributes in ruminants: nuclear and related methodologies (2th Ed.). Springer Verlag Gmbh.

Yadav, N. K., Vaidya, B. N., Henderson, K., Lee, J. F., Stewart, W. M., Dhekney, S. A., & Joshee, N. (2013). A review of Paulownia biotechnology: A short rotation, fast growing multipurpose bioenergy tree. American Journal of Plant Science, 4, 2070. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2013.411259

Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 February 2025
  • Revise Date: 13 April 2025
  • Accept Date: 13 April 2025
  • First Publish Date: 25 May 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics