The Effect of Adding Lactobacillus Isolates, Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Iranian Native Poultry on Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Blood Parameters and Safety Parameters of Broilers

Document Type : Research Articles


1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of agriculture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

2 North Branch Institute, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran

3 Researcher, North region branch, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Rasht, Iran


Introduction[1]: Feed additives are commonly used in poultry feed to enhance performance, promote health, and increase nutrient efficiency. The use of antibiotics as growth promoters in poultry feed has been prevalent for years. However, due to concerns regarding the accumulation of antibiotic residues in poultry products and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains, antibiotics are no longer considered desirable additives in poultry feed. As a non-therapeutic alternative to antibiotics, probiotics have been introduced as suitable candidates to promote growth. Probiotics have beneficial effects on poultry digestive enzymes, improve intestinal absorption, and neutralize toxins produced by harmful microorganisms, ultimately improving the immune system and economic performance. Among the most popular probiotic bacteria are Lactobacilli, as they are generally classified as safe bacteria.
Materials and methods Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri ABRIG25 (MF686485)) and salivarius (L. salivarius NABRII59 (MH595987) isolated from the digestive tract of Guilan’s native chicks and Mazandaran’s duck  respectively, were prepared up to 1.36×109 CFU using MRS medium at 37 ° C, under anaerobic conditions. 300 one-day-old male Arbor-Acres chicks were distributed in a completely randomized design, with 5 treatments, 4 replications (15 chicks per replicate). Experimental treatments were: 1- Basic diet as control group (Cont), 2- Basic diet + 100 g / ton Avilamycin as antibiotic group (Anti), 3- Basic diet + 200 g / ton commercial probiotic (Lacto-feed®) (Plac), 4- Basic diet + 1 g / Kg of L. salivarius NABRII59 (MH595987) bacterial powder (Pls1), and 5- basic diet + 1 g / kg of L. reuteri ABRIG25 (MF686485) bacterial powder (Plr1). Daily feed intake, weight gain, and feed conversion ratio of broilers were determined and recorded in starter, grower, and finisher  periods. On day 42, two chicks were slaughtered from each replicate and the weight of internal organs and carcass cuts were recorded as a percentage of carcass weight. Chicken antibody reaction were determined using SRBS suspension. On days 22 and 35 of the rearing period, two chicks were randomly selected from each cage and 0.1 cc of  SRBC solution was injected into to the wing’s vein, intravenously. Humoral immunity test was applied on days 29 and 42, using 1 cc of blood taken from the wing vein of chickens. The hemagglutination reaction was recorded based on the last two dilutions as SRBC’s antibody using the logarithm and the antibody titer against Newcastle was determined by hem agglutination inhibition (HI) test. On day 42, blood samples were taken randomly from 2 birds per replication to evaluate blood-serum parameters including glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, LDL and VLDL. All data were analyzed using SAS software v.9.1 (2012) in GLM procedure using a completely randomized design, and comparison of statistical means was performed, using Duncan's method at the level of 0.05.
Results and Discussion: The present study investigated the effect of native probiotic isolates (Plr1, Pls1) compared to commercial probiotics (Plac) and antibiotics (Anti) on the growth performance of chickens. The results showed no significant differences in daily feed intake, weight gain, and feed conversion ratio between experimental treatments. However, two native probiotic isolates (Plr1, Pls1), the commercial probiotic (Plac), and the antibiotic (Anti) resulted in a significant reduction (P <0.05) in proventriculus weight, while there were no significant differences in the relative weight of other organs. Both the commercial probiotic (Plac) and the native Lactobacillus isolates (Plr1 and Pls1) significantly improved total immunoglobulin and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels after both the first and second injections (P <0.05). Lactobacillus salivarius (Pls1) isolate also significantly improved immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels after the second injection. However, there were no significant differences between treatments and the control group in terms of antibody titer against Newcastle disease vaccine, blood glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, VLDL, and LDL levels. Probiotics can affect gut microbiota by competing for nutrients and attachment sites on the intestinal epithelial cells. Additionally, they may improve blood parameters and stimulate immune system cells to produce cytokines, which play an important role in inducing and regulating immune responses in poultry. Probiotics support lactic acid-producing bacteria and stabilize the gut microflora, which has beneficial effects on feed conversion ratio by stimulating the production of digestive enzymes. Furthermore, probiotics may reduce cholesterol synthesis by fermenting indigestible carbohydrates, leading to the production of short-chain fatty acids and ultimately lowering cholesterol levels in the host bird. Discrepancies in results reported by different researchers may partly be due to differences in chick’s age and breed, level of stress, diet composition, consumption period and duration, type of commercial probiotics, dose or amount of probiotic intake, management skills, and environmental conditions in different experiments.
Conclusion: The general conclusion is that the probiotic isolates used in this study are competitive with the commercial type of probiotics as well as the antibiotic used and are promising as probiotic candidate with beneficial effects on broiler’s performance, blood biochemical parameters and immune system


Main Subjects

  1. Abd El‐Hack, M. E., El‐Saadony, M. T., Shafi, M. E., Qattan, S. Y., Batiha, G. E., Khafaga, A. F., and Alagawany, M. (2020). Probiotics in poultry feed: A comprehensive review. Journal of Aanimal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 104(6), 1835-1850. .
  2. Abd-El-Rahman, A. H., Kamel, H. H., Ahmed, W. M., Mogoda, O. S., and Mohamed, A. H. (2012). Effect of Bactocell and revitilyte-plus as probiotic food supplements on tm the growth performance, hematological, biochemical parameters and humoral immune response of Broiler Chickens. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(3),305-316. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.03.63247 .
  3. Ahmed, E., Abdelrahman, M., and Gahreeb, K. (2019). Effect of probiotic on growth performance, carcass traits, and clinical health parameters of broilers reared under heat stress in upper Egypt. SVU-International Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2(2), 27-44. .
  4. Ashayerizadeh, A., Dabiri, N., Mirzadeh, K. H., and Ghorbani, M. R. (2011). Effects of dietary inclusion of several biological feed additives on growth response of broiler chickens. Journal of Cell and Animal Biology, 5,61-6.
  5. Awad, W. A., Böhm, J., Razzazi-Fazeli, E., Ghareeb, K., and Zentek, J. (2006). Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 85(6), 974-979. .
  6. Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., and Böhm, J. (2009). Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 88(1), 49-56. .
  7. Chen, F., Zhu, L., and Qiu, H. (2017). Isolation and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus salivarius and Pediococcus pentosaceus in specific pathogen free chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 19, 325-332. doi:10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0413 .
  8. Chen, X., Ishfaq, M., and Wang, J. (2022). Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius supplementation on the growth performance, liver function, meat quality, immune responses and Salmonella Pullorum infection resistance of broilers challenged with Aflatoxin B1. Poultry Science, 101(3), 101651.
  9. Dalloul, R. A., Lillehoj, H. S., Tamim, N. M., Shellem, T. A., and Doerr, J. A. (2005). Induction of local protective immunity to Eimeria acervulina by a Lactobacillus-based probiotic. Comparative Iimmunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 28(5-6), 351-361. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2005.09.001 .
  10. FDA. 2010. Generally recognized as safe (GRAS) notifications. Available at First accessed on 22 April 2016.
  11. Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 66(5), 365-378. .
  12. Fuller, R. (2001). The chicken gut microflora and probiotic supplements. The Journal of Poultry Science, 38(3), 189-196. .
  13. Ghaniei, A., and Mohammadzadeh, N. (2012). Detection of Newcastle disease virus antibodies in serum of broiler chickens of Iran. Journal of Animal and Poultry Sciences, 1(1), 24-28.
  14. Habibi, S., Khojasteh, S., and Jafari, M. (2013). The effect of Bactocell and Protexin probiotics on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2(11), 565-570.
  15. Hassan, H. M., Samy, A., Youssef, A. W., and Mohamed, M. A. (2018). Research Article Using Different Feed Additives as Alternative to Antibiotic Growth promoter to improve growth performance and carcass traits of broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 17, 255-261. .
  16. Hossain, M. M., Begum, M., and Kim, I. H. (2015). Effect of Bacillus subtilis, Clostridium butyricum and Lactobacillus acidophilus endospores on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, relative organ weight, microbial shedding and excreta noxious gas emission in broilers. Veterinarni Medicina, 60(2), 77-86.
  17. Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., and Jalaludin, S. (1998). Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science, 77(9), 1259-1265. .
  18. Kabir, S. L., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. B., Rahman, M. M., and Ahmed, S. U. (2004). The dynamics of probiotics on growth performance and immune response in broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 3(5), 361-364.
  19. Kalavathy, R., Abdullah, N., Jalaludin, S., and Ho, Y. W. (2003). Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 44(1), 139-144. .
  20. Kamboh, A. A. (Ed.). (2018). Synergetic effects of multispecies probiotic supplementation on certain blood parameters and serum biochemical profile of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Health and Production, 6(1), 27-34. .
  21. Kannan, D., Viswanathan, K., and Mohan, B. (2007). The effect of feeding virginiamycin and lactobacillus sporogenes on broiler production performance characters. Journal of Veterinary & Animal Science, 3(2), 1-106.
  22. Karimi Torshizi, M. A., Moghaddam, A. R., Rahimi, S. H., and Mojgani, N. (2010). Assessing the effect of administering probiotics in water or as a feed supplement on broiler performance and immune response. British poultry science, 51(2), 178-184. .
  23. Kizerwetter-Swida, M., and Binek, M. (2009). Protective effect of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strain on infection with pathogenic bacteria in chickens. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 12, 15-20.
  24. Kumar, M. V., Patil, V. M., Kiran, M., and Tendulkar, S. M. (2018). Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Probiotics (Addon Poultry Max) on Biochemical and Immune Parameters in Commercial Broiler Chicken. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(10), 1537-1542. .
  25. Lehman, D. C. (2014). Biochemical identification of gram-negative bacteria. Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology-E-Book, 182.
  26. Li, Y. B., Xu, Q. Q., Yang, C. J., Yang, X., Lv, L., Yin, C. H., and Yan, H. (2014). Effects of probiotics on the growth performance and intestinal micro flora of broiler chickens. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 27.
  27. Lillehoj, H., Liu, Y., Calsamiglia, S., Fernandez-Miyakawa, M. E., Chi, F., Cravens, R. L., and Gay, C. G. (2018). Phytochemicals as antibiotic alternatives to promote growth and enhance host health. Veterinary Research, 49(1), 1-18. .
  28. Liong, M. T., and Shah, N. P. (2006). Effects of a Lactobacillus casei synbiotic on serum lipoprotein, intestinal microflora, and organic acids in rats. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(5), 1390-1399. .
  29. Lutful Kabir, S. M. (2009). The role of probiotics in the poultry industry. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(8), 3531-3546. .
  30. Lye, H. S., Rusul, G., and Liong, M. T. (2010). Removal of cholesterol by lactobacilli via incorporation and conversion to coprostanol. Journal of dairy science, 93(4), 1383-1392. .
  31. Elbaz, A., and El-sheikh, S. (2020). Effect of dietary probiotic, antibiotic or combination on broiler performance, cecum microbial population and ileal development. Mansoura Veterinary Medical Journal, 21(3), 74-79. .
  32. Mountzouris, K., Tsirtsikos, P., Kalamara, E., and Fegeros, K. (2006). Evaluation of the effect of a new probiotic product on broiler performance and cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Proc International Poultry Science Forum. Atlanta, Georgia.
  33. Mountzouris, K. C., Tsitrsikos, P., Palamidi, I., Arvaniti, A., Mohnl, M., Schatzmayr, G., and Fegeros, K. (2010). Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science, 89(1), 58-67. .
  34. Mu, Q., Tavella, V. J., and Luo, X. M. (2018). Role of Lactobacillus reuteri in human health and diseases. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, 757. .
  35. Nakphaichit, M., Thanomwongwattana, S., Phraephaisarn, C., Sakamoto, N., Keawsompong, S., Nakayama, J., and Nitisinprasert, S. (2011). The effect of including Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 during post-hatch feeding on the growth and ileum microbiota of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 90(12), 2753-2765. .
  36. Nazifi, S. (1997). Hematology and clinical biochemistry of birds. Shiraz University Publication, Shiraz, Iran.
  37. Ohimain, E. I., and Ofongo, R. T. (2012). The effect of probiotic and prebiotic feed supplementation on chicken health and gut microflora: a review. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4(2), 135-143.
  38. Nii, T., Jirapat, J., Isobe, N., and Yoshimura, Y. (2020). Effects of oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri on mucosal barrier function in the digestive tract of broiler chicks. The journal of Poultry Science, 57(1), 67-76. .
  39. OIE, M. 2008. Chapter 2. 3. 14. Newcastle disease, in: OIE terrestrial manual: manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animal. World Organistion for Animal Health. Paris. France, pp. 598.
  40. Olnood, C. G., Beski, S. S., Choct, M., and Iji, P. A. (2015). Novel probiotics: Their effects on growth performance, gut development, microbial community and activity of broiler chickens. Animal Nutrition, 1(3), 184-191. .
  41. Patterson, J. A., and Burkholder, K. M. (2003). Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82(4), 627-631. .
  42. Pereira, D. I., and Gibson, G. R. (2002). Cholesterol assimilation by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria isolated from the human gut. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68(9), 4689-4693. .
  43. Rhee, K. J., Jasper, P. J., Sethupathi, P., Shanmugam, M., Lanning, D., and Knight, K. L. (2005). Positive selection of the peripheral B cell repertoire in gut-associated lymphoid tissues. The Journal of Experimental Medicine, 201(1), 55-62. .
  44. Ritzi, M. M., Abdelrahman, W., Mohnl, M., and Dalloul, R. A. (2014). Effects of probiotics and application methods on performance and response of broiler chickens to an Eimeria challenge. Poultry Science, 93(11), 2772-2778. .
  45. Rowghani, E., Arab, M., and Akbarian, A. (2007). Effects of a probiotic and other feed additives on performance and immune response of broiler chicks. International Journal of Poultry Science, 6(4), 261-265.
  46. Shokryazdan, P., Faseleh Jahromi, M., Liang, J. B., Ramasamy, K., Sieo, C. C., and Ho, Y. W. (2017). Effects of a Lactobacillus salivarius mixture on performance, intestinal health and serum lipids of broiler chickens. PloS one, 12(5), e0175959. .
  47. Stanton, T. B. (2013). A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends in Microbiology, 21(3), 111-113. .
  48. Taherpour, K., Moravej, H., Shivazad, M., Adibmoradi, M., and Yakhchali, B. (2009). Effects of dietary probiotic, prebiotic and butyric acid glycerides on performance and serum composition in broiler chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(10).
  49. Tayeri, V., Seidavi, A., Asadpour, L., and Phillips, C. J. (2018). A comparison of the effects of antibiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and prebiotics on the performance and carcass characteristics of broilers. Veterinary Research communications, 42, 195-207. .
  50. Timmerman, H. M., Veldman, A., Van den Elsen, E., Rombouts, F. M., and Beynen, A. C. (2006). Mortality and growth performance of broilers given drinking water supplemented with chicken-specific probiotics. Poultry Science, 85(8), 1383-1388. .
  51. Tomaro-Duchesneau, C., Jones, M. L., Shah, D., Jain, P., Saha, S., and Prakash, S. (2014). Cholesterol assimilation by Lactobacillus probiotic bacteria: an in vitro investigation. BioMed Research International, 2014. .
  52. Wondmeneh, E., Getachew, T., and Tadelle, D. (2012). Immunomodulatory effect of effective microorganisms (EM®) in chickens. Research Journal of Immunology, 5(1), 17-23.
  53. Yalcinkaya, I., Guengoer, T., Başalan, M., and Erdem, E. (2008). Mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in broilers: Effects on performance and blood biochemistry. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 32(1), 43-48.


  • Receive Date: 22 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 07 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 02 October 2022
  • First Publish Date: 02 October 2022