The Effect of Gamma Irradiation of Corn Seeds on Performance and Fermentation Parameters of Corn Forage and Silage

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

• Alireza Shabani Monazam ¹
• mehdi behgar ²
• Mohammad ali Norouzian ³
• Azam Borzoie ²

¹ Department of Livestock and Poultry Sciences, , Faculty of Agricultural Technology , University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

² Agricultural Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Karaj, Iran

³ Department of Livestock and Poultry Sciences , Faculty of Agricultural Technology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22067/ijasr.2022.73461.1050

Abstract

Introduction: The use of radiation has become a way of life in most countries around the globe. The utilization of nuclear techniques in the area of agriculture, defense, and power generation has increased over the last few decades. Radiation technology is widely used to produce changes in product characteristics leading to the development of new products. Radiation-mediated morphological, structural and/or functional changes in a plant are governed by the intensity and duration of the gamma irradiation. Gamma irradiation was found to increase plant productivity. Gamma rays represent one of the important physical agents used to improve the characters and productivity of many plants (e.g. rice, maize, bean, cowpea, and potato). Gamma irradiation also has been found to be very useful for both sterilization and for the preservation of food and cereal grain in nutrition and agriculture. Gamma rays were also found to cause modulation in protein patterns by inducing the appearance and/or disappearance of some protein bands. It has been shown that large DNA strands were broken into small strands at low irradiation doses but small and large DNA strands were broken at higher irradiation doses. Also it has reported that germination of seeds can be influenced in both positive and negative directions by gamma radiation exposure as a result of mutation inductions depending on cellular abnormalities or stimulatory modifications triggered by radiation doses. In several studies, lethal and stimulatory effects of gamma irradiation on germination percentage, emergence, and survival of seedlings of different plant species have been reported. The present work has been intended to investigate the response of corn seeds exposed to gamma irradiation (25 Gys) in terms of the nutritional performance of its forage and silage compared with control non-exposed seeds.
Materials and Methods: Corn seeds were obtained from the Vegetable Crop Seed Production and Technology section, Ghezlagh Farm, College of Abouraihan, university of Tehran, Iran. Four kg corn seeds (single cross 704) were divided into 2 groups. The first group did not have any treatment to serve as a control, while the second group was irradiated with Gamma rays (25 Gray) using Gamma cell – cobalt- 60 instruction and with the rate of 0.55 Gr/ min at the Nuclear Agricultural Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. Field experiments were conducted during the summer seasons at Ghezlal farm Research Station located at the southwest of Tehran province, Varamin, to study the effect of gamma irradiation (25 Gray) on the performance of corn forage and silage. After irradiation, control and irradiated seeds were cultivated in 2000 m². Agricultural practices such as: irrigation, weeding, fertilization, and pest control were carried out as recommended. Samples of corn plants were obtained at the late stage of growth and amounts of proline, soluble carbohydrate, and protein were determined. Performance chrematistics of experimental groups were also recorded. After harvesting, the corn forage was chopped and transferred to an experimental silo made of polyethylene pipe. DM, ash, CP, NDF, and ADF of experimental silages were determined according to standards procedures. The pH of silage also was determined using pH meters. For the determination of gas production parameters, 200 mg of dry samples were incubated at gas production environment and the amount and rate of gas production were recorded at a different time of incubation (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h). Using gas production parameters, the amount of OM digestibility, ME, NEL, and SCFA were also determined. Data were analyzed using the t-student test of SAS software (ver. 9.1). Duncan’s multiple range test was used to detect statistical significance between treatments using a significance level of 0.05.
Results and discussion: Irradiation of corn seeds increased corn performance (wet and dry weight of seed and forage), amount of soluble carbohydrates and protein, and concentration of proline (P<0.05). The exposed treatment showed the highest increase in seed weight, seed number, and weight of 1000 seeds as compared to the control (P < 0.05). Amount of gas, and b and c fractions of gas production, the concentration of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), metabolizable (ME) and net energy for lactation (NEL), and organic matter digestibility (OMD) were higher for treated corn forage and silage compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Also, exposed corn silage had a lower level of pH and higher amount of dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) than control (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study show that exposing irradiation of corn seeds to 25 gray gamma-ray improves fermentation parameters and nutrition values of corn forage and silage.
 

Keywords

• Chemical composition
• Forage corn
• Gamma-ray
• Gas production

Main Subjects

• Animal Nutrition

---

References

1. Alizadeh, A., Dianati, G., & Naseryan Khyabani, B. (2014). Effect of seed irradiation with gamma ray on some physiological properties and biochemical parameters of plants in two species of Bromus inermis and tomentellus. Marta, 8(2), 137-147.
2. Al-Masri, M. R., & Zarkawi, M. (1994). Effects of gamma irradiation on chemical compositions of some agricultural residues. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 43, 257-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-806X(94)90188-0.
3. AOAC, International. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. (15^th) AOAC International, Arlington, VA.
4. Borzouei, A., Kafi, M., Sayahi, R., Rabiei, E., & Amin, P. S. (2013). Biochemical response of two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum) to gamma radiation. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 45(2), 473-477.
5. Falahati, A., Kazemitabar, S. K., Bahrami, A. R., Lahouti, M., &  Rahimi, M. F. (2007). The study of gamma irradiation effects on drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Crop Science, 2(1), 155-158.
6. Fazaeli, H. H. A., & Golmohammadi, H. A. (2012). Productivity and nutritive value of barley green fodder yield in hydroponic system. World Applied Science Journal, 16, 531-539.
7. García-Lara, S., & Serna-Saldivar, S. O. (2002). Corn history and culture. Corn, Elsevier, 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811971-6.00001-2
8. Getachew, G., DePeters, E. J., & Robinson, P. H. (2004). In vitro gas production provides effective method for assessing ruminant feeds. California Agriculture, 58(1), 54-58.
9. He, Y. (2018). Lignin composition is more important than content for maize stem cell wall degradation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98, 384-390.
10. Krizsan, S. J., Jančík, F., Ramin, M., &  Huhtanen, P. (2013). Comparison of some aspects of the in situ and in vitro methods in evaluation of neutral detergent fiber digestion. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 838-847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5343
11. Kulivand, M., & Kafilzadeh, F. (2015). Correlation between chemical composition, kinetics of fermentation and methane production of eight pasture grasses. Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences, 37(1), 9-14.
12. Maity, S., Chakraborty, S., Subrata, P., Jiin-Shuh, A., & Anindita, C. (2009). Effects of gamma irradiation on edible seed protein, amino acids and genomic DNA during sterilization. Food Chemistry, 114, 1237-1244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.001
13. Mashev, N., Vassilev, G., & Ivanov, K. (1995). A study of N-allyl N-2 pyridyl thiourea and gamma radiation treatment on growth and quality of peas and wheat. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology, 21, 56-63.
14. McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R., & Heron, S. J. E. (1991). The biochemistry of silage. 2^nd Chalcombe Pub., Marlow. 340 p.
15. Melki, M., & Salami, D. (2008). Studies the effects of low dose of gamma rays on the behavior of chickpea under various conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 11(1), 2326–2330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0222-1.
16. Melki, M., & Marouani, A. (2010). Effects of gamma rays irradiation on seed germination and growth of hard wheat. Environmental Chemistry Letter, 8(4), 307–310.
17. Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H., Fritz, D., & Schneider, W. (1979). The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 93, 217-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305
18. Menke, K. H., & Steingass, Y. H. (1998). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Developments, 28, 7-55.
19. Nepal, S., Ojha, B. R., Meador, A. S., & Gaire, S. P. (2014). Effect of gamma rays on germination and photosynthetic pigments of maize (Zea mays) inbreds. International Journal of Research, 1(5), 511-525.
20. Pasangka, B. (2013). The application of multigamma radiation as a physical mutagen for breeding of local soybean. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 8(5), 450-456.
21. Shazali, A. M., Nahid, A., Salma, H. A., & Elfadil, E. B.  (2016). Effect of radiation process on antinutrients, protein digestibility and sensory quality of pearl millet flour during processing and storage. International Food Research Journal, 18(4), 1401-1407.
22. Smith, C.W. (2004). Corn: origin, history, technology, and production, John Wiley & Sons.
23. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A., (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in ration to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
24. Verbic, J., Ørskov, E. R., Žgajnar, J., & Chen, X. B. (1999). The effect of method of forage preservation on the protein synthesis in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 82, 195-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00102-9
25. Weiss, W. P., & Hall, M. B. (2020). Laboratory methods for evaluating forage quality. Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, 2, 659-672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119436669.ch36
26. Wahyono, T., Hardani, S. N. W., Sugoro, I., & Peternakan, (2018). Low irradiation dose for sorghum seed sterilization: Hydroponic fodder system and In vitro study. Buletin Peternakan, 42(3), 215-221.
27. Wahyono, T. (2018). Evaluasi fermentabilitas ransum kerbau yang mengandung sorgum dengan pendekatan In Sacco, In vitro dan RUSITEC. Thesis. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
28. Wang, M., Wang, R., & Janssen, P. H. (2016). Sampling procedure for the measurement of dissolved hydrogen and volatile fatty acids in the rumen of dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 1159-1169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9658
29. Yadava, A., Singh, B., & Singh, S. D. (2019). Impact of gamma irradiation on growth, yield and physiological attributes of maize. Indian journal of experimental biology, 57, 116-122.