Effect of Autolyzed Yeast on Performance and Physiological Indices of Broiler Chickens Reared at High Stock Density

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

Animal Science Department, Animal Science and Food Technology Faculty, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, Iran

Abstract

Introduction: Exposure of poultry to various environmental stressors, such as vaccination, heat stress, high stocking density, and direct contact with excrement in the litter, can stimulate the stress response, disrupt the body's immunity, and external pathogenic factors introduce to a healthy animal. Therefore, they affect natural growth and production. High stocking density can be stressful and have harmful effects on the performance and safety of broiler chickens. Among the environmental factors, stocking density is an important factor in the production of broiler chickens due to its effects on health, well-being, and performance. Stocking density is defined based on the number of birds per surface unit or the amount of surface for each bird and based on the kilogram of poultry weight per surface unit. Yeasts and yeast products can act as an alternative to antibiotics to promote growth and disease resistance in poultry. Autolyzed yeast consists of ruptured or lysed cells and includes both intracellular and cell wall parts. Autolyzed yeast is usually concentrated or dried by liquid fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and after autolysis or hydrolysis catalyzed by exogenous enzymes. In broiler chickens, the effects of prebiotics are partially dependent on the blocking of pathogen-adherent receptor sites, regulation of the immune system, production of antimicrobial molecules by the intestinal microbial community, and changes in the intestinal microbial structure.
 
Materials and Methods: This experiment was carried for 37 days in 3 periods including starter (1-10 days old), grower (11-24 days old) and finisher (37-25 days old) using 520 one-day-old broiler chickens of Ross 308 commercial strain in a completely randomized design based on factorial arrangement 4 x 2 with 5 replicates. Experimental treatments included different levels of autolyzed yeast (0, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3%) and 2 density levels (10 (normal density) and 16 (high density) bird per square meter). The basal diet used was adjusted based on the requirements of broiler chickens (Ross, 2019). Food and water were provided ad-libitum. Feed intake (FI) and body weight gain (BWG) of birds were recorded and feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated. On the 37th day of the experiment, two birds from each replicate were randomly selected and the weight of different parts of the carcass including the weight of gastrointestinal tract, breast, thigh, gizzard, liver, pancreas, and spleen (as a percentage of live body weight) were recorded. Also, at this time, caecal digesta (1 g) from each bird were aseptically transferred into 9 ml of sterile saline solution and serially diluted. Lactobacilli, Coliforms, and E.Coli were grown on Rogosa–Sharpe agar, MacConkey Agar, and Eosin Methylene Blue Agar, respectively. Plates for Lactobacillus were incubated anaerobically for 48 h at 37 °C. Microbial populations for E. coli and Coliforms were counted after aerobic incubation at 37°C for 24 hours. All samples were plated in duplicate. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using SAS statistical software, GLM procedure. Also, comparison of averages was done by Duncan's multi-range test at 5% probability level.
 
Results and Discussion: The results of the experiment showed that feed intake, body weight gain and feed conversion ratio were not affected by the interaction of yeast and density (P>0.05). However, the use of autolyzed yeast significantly reduced the feed intake in the finisher period as well as the whole period of the experiment (P<0.05). Also, birds reared in high density showed significantly less feed intake and weight gain compared to birds reared in normal density in the finisher period and the whole period of the experiment (P<0.05). The feed conversion ratio in birds fed with autolyzed yeast improved significantly compared to the control treatment in the starter period as well as the entire experimental period (P<0.05). Carcass components and cecum microbial population of broilers were not affected by the interaction of yeast and density (P>0.05). Also, birds reared in high density showed less Lactobacillus population in cecum compared to birds reared in normal density (P<0.05). Using levels of 0.2 and 0.3% of autolyzed yeast in the diet caused a significant decrease in the cecum E. coli population compared to the control treatment.
 
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that although the use of autolyzed yeast in high density conditions could not affect the functional and physiological parameters of the animal, the use of autolyzed yeast improved the feed conversion ratio and reduced the population of E. coli of cecum.
 







 




 

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

  1. Abbasi, M., Abedini, M. R., & Mousavi, S. N. (2019). Evaluating the economic impact of stocking density and bedding material on productive performance in broiler chickens. Animal Production, 21(1), 61-71. (In Persian with English Summary). https://doi.org/10.22059/jap.2019.263375.623307.
  2. Abudabos, A. M., Samara, E. M., Hussein, E. O. S., Al-Ghadi, M. Q., & Al-Atiyat, R. M. (2013). Impacts of stocking density on the performance and welfare of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 12, 66-71. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2013.e11
  3. Adhikari, P. A., Cosby, D. E., Cox, N. A., Franca, M. S. S., Williams, M., Gogal Jr, R. M., Ritz, C. W., & Kim, W. K. (2018). Effect of dietary fructooligosaccharides supplementation on internal organs Salmonella colonization, immune response, ileal morphology, and ileal immunohistochemistry in laying hens challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Poultry Science, 97, 2525-2533. http://dx.doi.org/3382/ps/pey101.
  4. Adhikari, P. A., & Kim, W. K. (2017). Overview of prebiotics and probiotics: Focus on performance, gut health and immunity - A review. Annals of Animal Science, 4, 949-966. http://dx.doi.org/1515/aoas-2016-0092.
  5. Ahiwe, E. U., Abdallh, M. E., Chang’a, E. P., Al-Qahtani, M., Omede, A. A., Graham, H., & Iji, P. A. (2019a). Influence of autolyzed whole yeast and yeast components on broiler chickens challenged with Salmonella Poultry Science, 98, 7129-7138. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez452.
  6. Ahiwe, E. U., Omede, A. A., Abdallh, M. E., Chang’a, E. P., Al-Qahtani, M., Gausi, H., Graham, H., & Iji, P. A. (2019b). Response of broiler chickens to dietary supplementation of enzymatically hydrolyzed glucan or mannan yeast products. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 28, 892-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfz047.
  7. Cengiz, Ö., Köksal, B. H., Tatlı, O. Sevim, Ö., Ahsan, U., Üner, A. G., Uluta, A., Beyaz, D., Büyükyörük, S., Yakan, A., & Önol, A. G. (2015). Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poultry Science, 94, 2395-2403. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev194
  8. Emmans, G. C., & Charles, D. R. (1977). Climatic environment and poultry feeding in practice. pp. 31-49 in Nutrition and the Climatic Environment. W. Haresign, H. Swan, and D. Lewis, ed. Butterworths, London, UK.
  9. Firon, N., Ofek, I., & Sharon, N. (1983). Carbohydrate specificity of the surface lectins of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Salmonella typhimurium. Carbohydrate Research, 120, 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(83)88019-7.
  10. Hassanabadi, A., & Mahdipour Rabori, M. (2009). Effects of stocking density on growth performance, blood metabolites and carcass characteristics of male broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science Research, 19/1(2), 138-155. (In Persian with English Summary). https://www.sid.ir/paper/450894/fa.
  11. Houshmand, M., Azhar, K., Zulkifli, I., Bejo, M. H., & Kamyab, A. (2012). Effects of prebiotic, protein level, and stocking density on performance, immunity, and stress indicators of broilers. Poultry Science, 91, 393-401. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01050
  12. Karar, E. M. H., Atta, A. M. M., Gharib, H. B. A., & El-Menawey, M. A. A. (2023). Impact of prebiotic supplementation on productive performance, carcass traits, and physiological parameters of broiler chickens under high stocking density condition. Journal of World’s Poultry Research, 13(1), 48-60. https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/jwpr.2023.5
  13. Kridtayopas, C., Rakangtong, C., Bunchasak, C., & Loongyai, W. (2019). Effect of prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation in diet on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, stress, and bacterial population under high stocking density condition of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 98, 4595-4605. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez152
  14. Kryeziu, A. J., Kamberi, M., Muji, S., Mestani, N., & Berisha, S. (2018). Carcass traits of broilers as affected by different stocking density and sex. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 24(6), 1097-1103.
  15. Loh, G., & Blaut, M. (2012). Role of commensal gut bacteria in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut Microbes, 3, 544-555. http://dx.doi.org/4161/gmic.22156
  16. Meimandipour, A., Shuhaimi, M., Soleimani, A. F., Azhar, K., Hair-Bejo, M., Kabeir, B. M., Javanmard, A., Muhammad Anas, O., & Yazid, A. M. (2010). Selected microbial groups and short-chain fatty acids profile in a simulated chicken cecum supplemented with two strains of Lactobacillus. Poultry Science, 89, 470-476. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00495.
  17. Molaei, F., & Salari, S. (2023). Effect of different levels of autolyzed yeast on performance and egg quality traits in laying hens reared under high stocking density. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 54(3), 317-336. (In Persian with English Summary). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijas.2023.351584.653920.
  18. Morales-López, R., Auclair, E., Garcia, F., Esteve-Garcia, E., & Brufau, J. (2009). Use of yeast cell walls; β-1, 3/1, 6-glucans; and mannoproteins in broiler chicken diets. Poultry Science, 88, 601-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00298
  19. Nahashon, S. N., Adefope, N., & Wright, D. (2011). Effect of floor density on growth performance of Pearl Grey guinea fowl replacement pullets. Poultry Science, 90, 1371-1378. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01216
  20. Reisinger, N., Ganner, A., Masching, S., Schatzmayr, G., & Applegate, T. J. (2012). Efficacy of a yeast derivative on broiler performance, intestinal morphology and blood profile. Livestock Science, 143, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.013
  21. Roto, S. M., Rubinelli, P. M., & Ricke, S. C. (2015). An introduction to the avian gut microbiota and the effects of yeast-based prebiotic-type compounds as potential feed additives. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2, 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00028
  22. Salari, S., & Javidaneh, K. (2023). Effect of autolyzed yeast on performance, egg quality, microbial population and intestinal morphology of laying hens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 15(1), 93-106. (In Persian with English Summary). http://dx.doi.org/10.22067/ijasr.2022.73976.1056.
  23. Salianeh, N., Shirzad, M. R., & Seifi, S. (2011). Performance and antibody response of broiler chickens fed diets containing probiotic and prebiotic. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 39, 65-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.565222
  24. Simitzis, P. E., Kalogeraki, E., Goliomytis, M., Charismiadou, M. A., Triantaphyllopoulos, K., Ayoutanti, A., Niforou, K., Hager-Theodorides, A. L., & Deligeorgis, S. G. (2012). Impact of stocking density on broiler growth performance, meat characteristics, behavioural components and indicators of physiological and oxidative stress. British Poultry Science, 53(6), 721-730. http://dx.doi.org/1080/00071668.2012.745930
  25. Thomas, D. G., Ravindran, V., Thomas, D. V., Camden, B. J., Cottam, Y. H., Morel, P. C. H., & Cook, C. J. (2004). Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 52, 76-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2004.36408
  26. Vargas-Rodríguez, L. M., Durán-Meléndez, L. A., García-Masías, J. L., Arcos-García, J. L., Joaquín-Torres, B. M., & Ruelas-Inzunza, M. G. (2013). Effect of probiotic and population density on the growth performance and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens. Internathional Journal of Poultry Science, 12(7), 390-395. http://dx.doi.org/3923/ijps.2013.390.395
  27. Wu, C., Yang, Z., Song, C., Liang, C., Li, H., Chen, W., Lin, W., & Xie, Q. (2018). Effects of dietary yeast nucleotides supplementation on intestinal barrier function, intestinal microbiota, and humoral immunity in specific pathogen free chickens. Poultry Science, 97, 3837-3846. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey268
  28. Yalçın, , Yalçın, S., Çakın, K., Eltanc, Ö., & Dağaşan, L. (2010). Effects of dietary yeast autolysate (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, egg traits, egg cholesterol content, egg yolk fatty acid composition and humoral immune response of laying hens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90, 1695-1701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4004
  29. Yalçın, S., Eser, H., Yalçın, S., Cengiz, S., & Eltan, Ö. (2013). Effects of dietary yeast autolysate (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, carcass and gut characteristics, blood profile, and antibody production to sheep red blood cells in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 22, 55-61. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00577
  30. Yang, Y., Iji, P. A., Kocher, A., Mikkelsen, L. L., & Choct, M. (2008). Effects of mannanoligosaccharide and fructooligosaccharide on the response of broilers to pathogenic Escherichia coli British Poultry Science, 49, 550-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660802290408
  31. Zhang, A. W., Lee, B. D., Lee, S. K., Lee, K. W., An, G. H., Song, K. B., & Lee, C. H. (2005). Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 84, 1015-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.7.1015
CAPTCHA Image
Volume 16, Issue 3 - Serial Number 59
September 2024
Pages 385-400
  • Receive Date: 21 September 2023
  • Revise Date: 26 November 2023
  • Accept Date: 23 December 2023
  • First Publish Date: 23 December 2023