Effect of Harvest Stage and Ratio of Forage Sorghum to Corn Silage on Its Nutritional Value and Degradability

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

• Nafiseh Rahmanian Sharifabad ¹
• Ehsan Salehifar ¹
• Alireza Foroughi ²

¹ Department of Agricultural science, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.

² Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Educatin Center, AREEO, Mashhad, Iran

10.22067/ijasr.2022.70346.1024

Abstract

Introduction Fodder sorghum is one of the most important forage plants in arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Maize production is low in arid and high salinity regions around the world, and sorghum due to its adaptation to arid and low water conditions, high water use efficiency, C4 photosynthetic system, high clawing power, high production capacity as wet forage, dry and Silos are a good option in these areas. In the past, sorghum was generally grown in areas that were unfavorable for growing corn, but today, with the advent of hybrid fodder sorghums, it produces under ideal conditions corn-like crops, and where moisture is a limiting factor and may have a higher yield than corn. Recently, frequent droughts in Iran have attracted the attention of farmers and livestock breeders to other forages such as sorghum, and due to the limited growing season of this forage, its use as a silo is common. Stage of growth is one of the most important factors influencing nutritional quality of fodder silages. As the fodder matures, the cytoplasmic portion of the cell reduces and the quantity of protein, lipids, soluble carbohydrates and soluble minerals decrease. Due to the drought occurrence on large parts of Iran and the adaptation of sorghum to drought conditions, a very few studies have been done on its chemical composition and nutritional value. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of plant growth stage and mixing of corn and sorghum on chemical composition and degradability of corn and sorghum silage.
Materials and Methods In order to evaluate the effects of harvesting steps and the ratio of forage sorghum blending on nutritional value and its degradability compared to corn silage, this experiment were performed using 45 experimental silos in a factorial experiment based on a completely randomize design with 15 treatments and 3 replications. Experimental groups consist of: sorghum harvest time (first factor) including: 1) before flowering (emergence of flag leaf), 2) about 10-15 percent flowering, and 3) soft seed soils. Sorghum harvested at each of the above time with forage corn with ratios of corn fodder to sorghum (second factor): 100%: 0%, 75%: 25%, 50: 50%, 25%: 75% and % 0: 100% was mixed. Silage samples were analyzed for Dry matter, crude protein, Ash and crude fat according to AOAC (2005) methods. In situ ruminal degradation kinetics parameters of DM, CP and NDF of experiment treatments were estimated using the nylon bag technique. Degradation of dry matter at times zero, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 9 hours was determined.
Results and discussion The results of this experiment indicated dry matter, crude protein had an upward trend with growth progression. While, the amount of crude fat, soluble sugar decreased significantly with plant growth. Ash content fluctuated during the growth stages, so that its amount was the lowest in flowering stage and was the highest during the vegetative stage (before flowering). The highest pH was observed in the soft dough stages and the mixing ratio of 25% corn and 75% sorghum, which indicates more proteolysis of silage. The lowest amount of ammonia nitrogen was observed in the soft dough phase treatment with 50% corn and 50% sorghum ratio and the highest amount of lactic acid was observed in the soft dough stage treatment with 100% sorghum, which may be due to increased soluble carbohydrate intake and convert it to lactic acid. Rapidly soluble fraction, degradation rate constant and effective degradability of dry matter, crude protein and cell wall at all passage rates increased significantly with increasing plant growth.
Conclusion In general, it can be concluded that harvesting corn and sorghum forage in the soft dough stage with a mixing ratio of 25% corn and 75% sorghum improves the pH of silage. Rumen degradability of silage dry matter in the soft dough stage with different levels of corn and sorghum composition can increase feed intake in livestock. Rumen degradability of silage dry matter was also higher in the soft dough stage with different levels of corn and sorghum composition than other stages, and this can reduced feed retention in the rumen and increased feed consumption in livestock. However, more research is needed to investigate the effect of feeding a mixture of corn silage and sorghum in ruminants on voluntary feed intake and production performance.
 

Keywords

• Chemical composition
• Degradability
• Silage
• Sorghum

Main Subjects

• Animal Nutrition

---

References

1. Amer, S., Hassanat, F., Berthiaume, R., Seguin, P. & Mustafa, A. F. (2012). Effects of water soluble carbohydrate content on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and in vitro gas production of forage millet and forage sorghum silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 177, 23–29. DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.2022.70346.1024

   2. AOAC. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. I. 15^th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
   3. Bal, M .A., Coors, J.G. & Shaver, R. D. (1997). Impact of the maturity of corn for use as silage in the diets of dairy cows on intake, digestion, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science, 80, 2497-2503.
   4. Buysse, J., & Merckx, R. (1993). An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. Journal of Experimental Botany, 44, 1627-1629.
   5. Chen, L., Dong, Z., Li, J. & Tao, S. (2019). Ensiling characteristics, in vitro rumen fermentation, microbial communities and aerobic stability of low-dry matter silages produced with sweet sorghum and alfalfa mixtures. Journal of Science Food Agriculture, 99, 2140–2151.
   6. Colombini, S., L. Rapetti, D., Colombo, GGalassi, M. & Crovetto. G.M. (2010). Brown midrib forage sorghum silage for the dairy cow: nutritive value and comparison with corn silage in the diet. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 9, 273-277.
   7. Costa, R. F., Pires, D. A. A., Moura, M. M. A., Rodrigues, J. A. S., Junior, V. R. R. & Tolentino, D. C. (2016). In situ degradability of dry matter and fibrous fraction of sorghum silage. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 38(2), 171-176.
   8. Di Marco, O., Aello, M., Nomdedeu, M. & Van Houtte, S. (2002). Effect of maize crop maturity on silage chemical composition and digestibility (in vivo, in situ and in vitro). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 99, 37–43.
   9. Fariani, A., Warly, L., Matsui, T. A., Fujihara, T. & Harumoto, T. (1994). Rumen degradability of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum, L) harvested at three different growth stages in sheep. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science, 7 (1), 41-48.
   10. Javadi, H., Saberi, M.H., Azari nasrabad, A. & khosravi, S. (2010). Examination the effect of
       quantities and style of distribution of nitrogen manure on quanitative and qualitative characteristics of
       speed feed sorghum. Journal of Iranian Animal Science, 8, 384-392. (In Persian).
   11. Johnson, L. M., Harrison, J. H., Davidson, D., Mahanna, W. C., Shinners, K. & Linder, D. (2002). Corn Silage Management: Effects of Maturity, Inoculation, and Mechanical Processing on Pack Density and Aerobic Stability. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(2),434–444.
   12. Jensen, C., Weisbjerg, M.R., Nørgaard, P. & Hvelplund, T. (2005). Effect of maize silage maturity on site of starch and NDF digestion in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 118, 279–294.

   13.Hurrell, R.F., Reddy, M.B., Juillerat, M. A. & Cook, J.D. (2003). Degradation of phytic acid in cereal porridges improves iron absorption by human subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 77, 1213-1219.

   14. Gul, I., Demirel, R., Kilicalp, N., Sümerli, M. & Kılıç. H. (2008). Effect of crop maturity stages on yield, silage chemical composition and in vivo digestibility of the maize, sorghum and sorghum-Sudan grass hybrids grown in semi-arid condition. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7, 1021-1028.
   15. Hadjipanayiotou, M., Antoniou, I., Theodoridou, M. & Photiou, A. (1996). In situ degradability of forages cut at different stages of growth. Journal of Liveestoc Production Science, 45, 49-53.
   16. Khan, S. H., Azim, A., Sarwar, M. & Khan, A.G. (2011). Effect of maturity on comparative nutritive value and fermentation characteristics of maize, sorghum and millet silage. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(6), 2967-2970.
   17. Khan, S. H., Khan, G. A., Sarwar, M. & Azim, A. (2007). Effect of maturity on production efficiency, nutritive value and in situ nutrients digestibility of three cereal fodders. International Journal of Agriculture Research, 2, 900-909.
   18. Klicalp, N., Hizli, H., Sumerli, M. & Avci, M. (2018). In situ rumen degradation characteristics of maize, sorghum and sorghum-Sudan grass hybrids silages as affected by stage of maturity. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 8(2), 231-239.
   19. Licitra, G., Hernandez, T.M. & Van soest, P.J. (1996). Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57, 347-358.
   20. Madrid, J., Martinez, A., Hernandez, F. & Megies, M. (1999). A comparative study on the determination of lactic acid in silage juice by colorimetric, high-performance liquid chromatography and enzymatic methods. Journal of Science Food Agriculture, 79, 1722-1726.
   21. McDonald, P. (1981). The biochemistry of silage. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. Chichester, United Kingdom.
   22. McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D. & Morgan, C.A. (2002). Animal nutrition, 6th ed., John Willey & Sons, New York.
   23. Nagaraja, T.G. & Titgemeyer, E.C. (2007). Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: the current microbiological and nutritional outlook. Journal of Dairy Science, 90 (1),E17-38.
   24. Newman, Y., Erickson, J., Vermerris, W. & Wrigh, D. (2010). Forage sorghum (sorghum bicolor): overview and management. Florida cooperative extension service. Available at: http://edis.Ifas.ufl.Edu.
   25. Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, P. (1979). The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation
       measurement weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agriculture Science, 92, 499-503.
   26. Rafıuddın, A., Javed, M., Jabbar, K. Shahıd, M.A., Jan, M.Q.P., Khan, S., Ramzan, M.A. & Hamdullah, M. (2016). Impact of flowerıng stage on nutrıtıve value, physıcal qualıty and digestibility of sılages made from cereal fodders. Applied Ecology Envıronmental Research, 14: 149-157.
   27. Rezvani Moghadam, M. & Nasiri mahalati, M. (2004). Examination of dry matter digestibility and persons of protein of three type of forage sorghum in different time of cut. Iranian Animal Science Magazin, 35, 787-796.
   28. SA Institute. (2009). SAS User’s Guide. Version 9.2. SAS Inst. Inc.,Cary, NC.
   29. Tabacco, E., Borreani, G., Valente, M.E. & Peiretti, P.G. (2004). Dry matter and water soluble carbohydrate content of Italian rye grass at affected by environmental factors. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 8, 63-74.
   30. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. & Lewis, B.A. (1991). Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and
       nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597.
   31. Zhang, S.J., Chaudhry, A.S. Osman, A., Shi, C.Q., Edwards, G.R., Dewhurst, R.J. & Cheng, L. (2015). Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value, fermentation and methane characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 206, 29-38.