Chemical Composition, in situ Ruminal Degradability, and Gas Production of Atriplex canesences, Salsola rigida and Aeluropus littoralis

Document Type : Ruminant Nutrition

Authors

• Ali Razzaghi ¹
• Reza Valizadeh ¹
• Mohammad Tarahimi ²

¹ Ferdwosi University of Mashhad

² Research Center of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Semnan Province

10.22067/ijasr.v7i1.48325

Abstract

Introduction: Demands of agricultural products, particularly in developing countries, are increasing rapidly. Consequently, land and water resources are unable to sustain such demands. For decades, rangelands in Africa, West and Central Asia suffered from overgrazing and many areas are severely degraded. Range vegetation used to be the main feed resource for livestock particularly in the arid and semi-arid regions such as Iran. Soil and water salinity is another major constraint affecting dry land agriculture and following animal production as soil salinization is a major environmental problem in Iran. Climate change, human activities, reduced vegetation and a rising water table are contributing to expansion of saline soils worldwide. Halophytic plants can be regarded as feed resources for ruminants in Iran as identified 354 different species growing on highly saline sites. These plants are naturally grown or cultivated in salt affected lands such as in saline semi-deserts and could have great potentialities particularly as sources of livestock fodders. However, wide intra- and inter-plant species variations in productivity, palatability, chemical composition, and nutritive value depend on seasonal changes, environmental conditions and management practices. Salt marsh plants, in particular chenopods forages, are relatively low in metabolizable energy and high in ash content. Data derived from many studies, on average values of chemical composition, crude fiber (3.4 to 14 percent) and dry matter digestibility (more than 60 percent) of most dominant halophytes in the Near East region have been determined. The aim of the study was to assess nutritive value of three most dominant halophytes in Semnan Province through determination of chemical compositions, in situ degradability and in vitro gas production techniques.
Materials and Methods: Nutritive value of Atriplex (A. canesences), Salsola (S. rigida) and Aeluropus (A. littoralis) were evaluated through determination of chemical compositions, in situ degradability and in vitro gas production techniques using three fistulated steers. The samples were collected at seed ripening period from Research Station in arid zone of Semnan Province and analyzed for chemical composition including crude protein (CP),ether extract (EE), ash, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), Ca, P, Na, K, Mg, Cl and S contents. Then, the samples were tested in an in vitro gas production method (96 h incubation) and batch rumen culture system (24 h incubation). The asymptotic gas production system (A) and lag time (L) parameters and also in vitro DM disappeared (IVDMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolizable energy (ME), short chain fatty acids (SCFA), N-NH3 content and pH were calculated. Subsequently, to determine the nutrients degradability of the plants, three fistulated steers were used. Approximately 5 g of each ground plant was weighed into Dacron bags with a pore size of 50 µm. Bags were incubated for 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h in the rumen. Zero-hour bags were only presoaked and washed. After rumen incubations, bags on were rinsed immediately with cold tap water, washed and dried at 60 ºC for 48 h to determine DM degradability. The residues from incubation time were used for determination of nutrient content (CP and NDF). Rumen degradation parameters of CP and NDF were estimated using the NLIN procedure of SAS.
Results and Discussion: All of these halophytic plants had high concentrations of Na, K, and Cl, and low levels of Ca, P and Mg. Moreover, the CP and ash contents of these plants were considerably high. It would be noticed that much of halophyte nitrogen is associated with non-protein compounds such as nitrates, glycine, betaine and proline. Other reports showed Atriplex shrubs contained higher level of ash. This result might be attributed to effects of salinity on cation accumulation as concentrations of some minerals in Atriplex spp. are higher than those recommended for ruminants and seem to reduce voluntary feed intake. There are variation between our found with results from other studies which is attributed to the difference in species, geographical regions, seasons and soil type. The asymptotic gas production system (A) and lag time (L) parameters were highest for Aeluropus. Also, OMD, ME, and SCFA parameters in Aeluropus were higher than Atriplex and Salsola. Furthermore, significant increase in gas produced after 96 h incubation was observed with Aeluropus in comparison to other plants. These results indicate that higher protein and lower NDF contents in Aeluropus may be attributed to different in gas production parameters. The amounts of OMD and ME were in line with results in other reports. However, the average fermentation rate (AFR) and pH were similar for halophyte plants. The rapidly degradable fractions of DM and CP of Salsola (28.42 and 55.68 %) were higher than those for Atriplex (23.24 and 48.7 %) and Aeluropus (21.50 and 51.28 %) which is associated with lower NDF and higher Ash contents in Salsola. On the other hand, degradability potential of DM and NDF of Aeluropus (52.42 and 75.82 %, respectively) were higher than those for Atriplex and Salsola. Moreover, Salsola showed the lowest effective degradability for NDF as measured at different outflow rates.
Conclusion: Overall halophyte plants were high in ash (Na, Cl and S) and CP but low in energy. Salsola plant may have better palatability because of lower NDF content and more soluble fraction (a) than to Aeluropus and Atriplex. The measured data in this study suggest that these halophytic plants can be regarded as feed resources for ruminants in the arid zones of Iran.

Keywords

• Halophytic plants
• chemical composition
• Gas production
• Degradability

---

References

1- Abbeddou, S., S. Rihawi, H. D. Hess, L. Iniguez, A. C. Mayar, and M. Kreuzer. 2011. Nutritional composition of lentil straw, vetch hay, olive leaves, and saltbush leaves and their digestibility as measured in fat-tailed sheep.Small Rumin Res. 96:126-135.

2- Abu-Zanat, M. M. W. 2005. Voluntary intake and digestibility of saltbush by sheep. Asia-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. Vol 18. NO.2: 214-1220.

3- Abu-Zanat, M. M. W., and M. J. Tabbaa. 2006. Effect of feeding Atriplex browse to lactating ewes on milk yield and growth rate of their lambs. Small Rumin Res. 64:152–161.

4- Al-Shorepy, S.A., G. A. Alhadrami, and A. I. El-Awad. 2010. Development of sheep and goat production system based on the use of salt-tolerant plants and marginal resources in the United Arab Emirates. Small Rumin Res. 91:39-46.

5- AOAC. 1997. Official Methods of Analysis. Association on Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.

6- Bashtini, J., and H. Tavakoli. 2002. Determination of nutritive value of five dominant species of halophyte plants in salt desert lands of Khorasan province. Journal of Pajouhesh and Sazandegi. 55:2-5. (In Persian with English abstract).

7- Benjamin, R.W., Y. Lavie, M. Forti, D. Barkai, R. Yonatan, and Y. Hefetz. 1995. Annual regrowth and edible biomass of two species of Atriplex and of Cassia sturtii after browsing. J. Arid Environ. 29:63–84.

8- Benjamin. R.W., W. E. Oren, E. Katz, and K. Becker. 1992. The apparent digestibility of Atriplex barclayana and its effect on nitrogen balance in sheep. Anim. Prod. 54:259-264.

9- Ben Salem, H., H. Abdouli, A. Nefzaoui, A. El-Mastouri, and L. Ben Salem. 2008. Nutritive value, behaviour, and growth of Barbarine lambs onoldman saltbush (Atriplex nummularia L.) and supplemented or notwith barley grains or spineless cactus (Opuntiaficus-indica f. inermis)pads. Small Rumin. Res. 59:229–237.

10- Ben Salem, H., A. Nefzaoui, and L. Ben Salem. 2004. Spineless cactus and oldman saltbush as alternative supplements for growing Barbarine lambs given straw-based diets. Small Rumin Res. 51:65-73.

11- Ben Salem, H ., H. C. Norman,A. Nefzaoui, D. E. Mayberry, K. L. Pearce, and D. K. Revell. 2010. Potential use of oldman saltbush (AtriplexnimmulariaLindl.) in sheep and goat feeding. Small Rumin Res. 91:13-28.

12- Ben Salem, H., and T. Smith. 2008. Feeding strategies to increase small ruminant production in dry environments. Small Rumin Res. 77:174-194.

13- Busquet, M., S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and Kamel. 2006. Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation. J. Dairy. Sci. 89:761-771.

14- Durmic, Z., P. Hutton, D.K. Revell, J. Emms, S. Hughes, and P.E. Vercoe. 2010. In vitro fermentative traits of Australian woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 160:98-109.

15- El Shaer, H.M. 1981. A comparative nutrition study on sheep and goats grazing Southern Sinai desert range with supplements. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture. Ain Shams University, Egypt.

16- El Shaer, H.M. 1999. Potentially of animal production in the Egyptian desert region. In: Proceeding of the conference on animal production in the 21st century challenges and prospects, 18-20 April, Egypt, Pp. 93.

17- El Shaer, H.M. 2010. Halophytes and salt-tolerant plants as potential forage for ruminants in near east region. Small Rumin Res. 91:3-12.

18- France, J., J. Dijkstra, M. S. Dhanoa, S. Lopez, and A. Bannink. 2000. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Br. J. Nutr. 83:143-150.

19- Getachew, G., M. Blummel, H. P. S. Makkar, and K. Becker. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds: a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:261-281.

20- Givens, D. I., E. Owen, R. F. E. Axford, and H. M. Omed. 2000. Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. CABI Press.

21- Harris, E. L. 1970. Nutrition research techniques for domestic and wild animals. Vol 1. Utah State University.

22- Hoffman, P. C., S. J. Seivert, R. D. Shaver, D. A. Welch, and D. K. Combs. 1993. In situ dry matter, protein and fiber degradation of perennial forage. J. Dairy. Sci. 76:2632-2643.

23- Hosseini-Nezhad, Z., M. Yousef Elahi., and H. Fazaeli. 2012. Determination of nutritive value of five halophyte plants in Sistan zone. Iran J. Anim. Sci. 43(1):1-10. (In Persian with English abstract).

24- Kaitho, R. J., I. V. Nsahlai, B. A. Williams, N. N. Ummunna, S. Tamminga, and Van Bruchem. 1998. Relationships between preference, rumen degradability, gas production and chemical composition of browsers. Agrofor. Syst. 39:129-144.

25- Kashki, V. 2011. Determination of nutritive value of several Atriples spp. by in vivo and in situ methods. Unpublished Report. Research Center of Natural Resources and Agriculture of Khorasan-e-Razavi, Mashhad. (In Persian).

26- Kumara Mahipala, M.B.P., G. L. Krebs, P. McCafferty, and L. H. P. Gunaratne. 2009. Chemical composition, biological effects of tannin and in vitro nutritive value of selected browse species grown in the West Australian Mediterranean environment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 153:203-215.

27- Larbi, A., J. W. Smith, I. O. Kurdi, I. O. Adeknle,A. M. Rajj, and D. O. Ladipo.1998. Chemical composition, rumen degradation and gas production characteristics of some multipurpose fodder trees and shrubs during wet and dry seasons in the humid tropics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:81- 96.

28- Laudadio, V., V. Tufarelli, M. Dario, M. Hammadi, M. M. Seddik, G. M. Lacalandra, and C. Dario. 2009. A survey of chemical and nutritional characteristicsof halophytes plants used by camels in Southern Tunisia. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 41:209-215.

29- Le Houerou, H. N. 1990. Eco-climate and bio-geographic comparison between the rangelands of the iso-climate Mediterranean arid zones of northern Africa and near East. In: S.A.S. Omar, M.A. Razzaque and F. Alsdirawi (eds): Range management in Arid Zones, pp.25-40. Kegan Paul international, London.

30- Le Houerou, H. N. 1992. The role of saltbushes (Atriplex spp.) in arid land rehabilitation in the Mediterranean basin: a review. Agrofor. Syst. 18:107–148.

31- Jahani-Azizabadi, H., M. Danesh-Mesgaran, A. R. Vakili, K. Rezayazdi, and M. Hashemi. 2011. Effect of various medicinal plant essential oils obtained from semi-arid climate on rumen fermentation characteristics of a high forage diet using in vitro batch culture. African J. Microb Res. 5(27): 4812-4819.

32- Masters, D.G., S. E. Bennes, and H. C. Norman. 2007. Biosaline agriculture for forage and livestock production. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment.119:234–248.

33- Masters. D.G., H. C. Norman, and R. A. Dynes. 2001. Opportunities and limitations for animal production from saline land. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:199-211.

34- Mayberry, D., D. Masters, and P. Verco. 2010. Mineral metabolism of sheep fed saltbush or a formulated high-salt diet. Small Rumin Res. 91:81-86.

35- McDougall, E. I. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem. J. 43:99–109.

36- Menke, K. H., L. Rabb, A. Saleweski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz, and W. Schinder. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. 93:217-222.

37- Menke, K. H., and H. Staingass. 1988. Estimation of energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Develop. 28:7-55.

38- Norton, B. W. 2003. The nutritive value of tree legumes. Pages 1-10 in Forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture. R.C. Gutteridge, and H.M. Shelton, ed. Available in website: http://www.fao.org/ag/agP /agpc/doc/Publicat/Gutt-shel/x5556e0j.htm.

39- Norman, H.C., C. Friend, D. G. Masters, A. J. Rintoul, R. A. Dynes, and I. H. Williams. 2004. Variation within and between two saltbush species in plant composition and subsequent selection by sheep. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 55:999–1007.

40- Norman, H.C., D. K. Revel, D. E. Mayberry, A. J. Rintoul,M. G. Wilmot, and D. G. Masters. 2010. Comparison of in vivo organic matter digestion of native Australian shrubs by sheep to in vitro and in sacco predictions. Small Rumin Res. 91:69-80.

41- Ørskov, E. R., F. D. DebHovell, and F. L. Mould. 1980. The use of the nylon bag technique for evaluation of feedstuffs. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 5:195-213.

42- Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and A. Koocheki. 2004. History of research on salt-affected lands of Iran. Pages 83-95 in Prospects of Saline Agriculture in the Arabian Peninsula. F. K. Taba, S. Ismail, and A. Jaradat, ed. Amherst Scientific Publishers Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.

43- Riasi, A., M. Danesh-Mesgaran, M. D. Stern and M. J. Ruiz Moreno. 2008. Chemical composition, in situ ruminal degradability and post-ruminal disappearance of dry matter and crude protein from the halophytic plants Kochiascoparia, Atriplexdimorphostegia. Suaedaarcuata and Gamanthusgamacarpus. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 141:209-219.

44- SAS Institute Inc. 2001. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

45- Theodorou, M. K, B. A. Williams, M. S. Dhanoa, A. B. McAllan, and J. France. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 48:185-197.

46- Towhidi, A., T. Saberifar., and E. Dirandeh. 2011. Nutritive value of some herbage for dromedary camels in the central arid zone of Iran. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43:617-622.

47- Valizadeh, R., M. Ghadami Kohestani., and F. Mellati. 2011. Determination of chemical composition and nutritive value of Eurotia ceratoides by in situ and gas production methods. Iran J. Anim. Sci. Res. 3(2): 159-165. (In Persian with English abstract).

48- Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy. Sci. 74:3583-3597.

49- Vanzant, E. S., R. C. Cochran, and E. C. Titgemeyer. 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2717-2729.