Evaluation of Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from the Gut of Honeybees Apis mellifera

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

• Samira Tootiaie ¹
• Naheed Mojgani ²
• Naser Harzandi ¹
• Mojtaba Moharrami ³
• Ladan mokhberalsafa ³

¹ Department of Microbiology ، Karaj Branch ، Islamic Azad university، Karaj، Iran

² Professor, Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute-Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

³ Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Iran.

10.22067/ijasr.2021.68076.1004

Abstract

Introduction: European honey bees (Apis mellifera) are the most important pollinator insects that play vital role in maintenance of all most all life forms on earth. However, over the last decade major concerns have raised due to decline in the population of these insect species. A variety of factors have been responsible for these concerns of which the most important is honey bee bacterial diseases like Nosemosis (Nosema), American and European foulbrood diseases. While, overuse of antibiotics utilized for the treatment and control of these diseases has resulted in the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains of these pathogens. Probiotics have been considered a suitable substitute of antibiotics in human and animals. In last several years, lactobacillus species isolated from honeybees have been considered of significance in enhancing the life span of honeybees by reducing the incidence of bacterial and viral infections in these tiny insects. Among the isolated microbes in the gut of honeybees, Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) are of utmost importance showing direct impacts on the health of their host by modulating the gut microbial flora and are termed as Probiotic bacteria.
The objective of this research was to isolate and identify LAB from different parts of the intestinal tract of honeybees Apis mellifera and to characterize their probiotic properties.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-four honeybees collected from the hives located in the city of karaj were analyzed for the presence of LAB species. The stomach contents of honeybees were inoculated into MRS broth, incubated at 37ºCfor 48 hrs. The obtained colonies were purified and identified to species levels phenotypically and geno-typically. Hemolytic activity and sugar fermentation reactions of the isolates were recorded and later subjected 16SrRNA sequencing using a pair of universal primers. The identified isolates were evaluated for their viability in acidic conditions at pH 2.5, 3.0, 4.0 and 6.5 at different time intervals. Bile resistance of the isolates was tested by culturing the isolates in the presence of different concentrations of the said salts (0.5, 0.7 and 1%). Survival of LAB isolates in simulated gastric and intestinal conditions containing different enzymes and bile salts, antibacterial spectrum against a number of gram positive and gram-negative pathogens by agar well diffusion assay, and their in vitro colonization ability (aggregation, co-aggregation and hydrophobicity percentages) were evaluated. The results were analyzed statistically.
Results and Discussion: Twenty nine gram positive, catalase negative and non-hemolytic colonies were isolated from 24 honeybee samples. Among these, only 7 colonies showed enhanced antibacterial activity and were selected for further studies. Based on phenotypic characteristics, sugar fermentation reactions and 16S rRNA sequencing the isolates were identified as Lactobacillus acidophilus (1), Lacticaseiobacillus casei, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (2), Lactobacillus apis (1), Enterococcus faecium (1) and Pediococcus acidilactici (1). During probiotic characterizations, the identified isolates were shown to retain their viability in acidic conditions and resisted pH 2.5, 3 and 4 for more than 4 hrs. However, slight decrease in viability at pH 2.5 and 3.0 was observed, compared to pH 4.0 and above. All isolates appeared bile resistant and tolerated all used concentrations of bile salts during 8 hrs of incubation. Survival rate of the isolates in simulated intestinal conditions was significantly (p˂0.05) greater compared to simulated gastric conditions indicating greater stability of the isolates to alkaline conditions rather than to acidic conditions. L.acidophilus and E.faecium showed least resistance in gastric conditions and their growth rate was decreased more than 50% under said conditions. In contrast, the growth rate of these two isolates was highest in simulated intestinal conditions as they resisted these conditions for more than 24 hours.  The isolates demonstrated antibacterial affect against a number of tested pathogens including Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Streprtococcus mutans. The auto-aggregation, and cell surface hydrophobicity percentages of L.casei appeared highest compared to other tested Lactic Acid bacteria in study (p˂0.05), while, L.apis showed the highest co-aggregation with S.typhi strain. P.acidilactici possessed the least auto-aggregation (46%), co-aggregation (10%) and hydrophobicity (43%) percentage. Auto-aggregation ability appeared directly related to hydrophobicity percentages and isolates showing high aggregation ability also showed high hydrophobicity %.
Conclusions: In conclusion, honeybee gut appeared a reservoir of LAB with probiotic potential. It is suggested that further studies should be conducted in order to determine the health benefits of these LABs in honeybees, with especial emphasis on their ability to prevent honeybee diseases.

Keywords

• Aggregation and co-aggregation
• Antibacterial activity
• Colonization
• Honeybees
• Probiotic

20.1001.1.20083106.1401.14.1.11.2

Main Subjects

• bee keeping

---

References

1. Audisio, M., M. Torres, Sabate, C. Ibarguren, and M. Apella. 2011. Properties of different lactic acid bacteria isolated from Apis mellifera L. beegut. Microbiological Research,166:1-13.
2. Axelsson, L., and S. Ahrné. 2000. Lactic acid bacteria. In Applied microbial systematics, Pages 367-388 Springer, Dordrecht.
3. Beumer, R. R., J. de Vries, and F. M. Rombouts.  1992. Campylobacter jejuninon-culturable coccoid cells. International Journal of Food Microbiology,15:153-163. 
4. Botes, M., B. Loss, C. A. Van Reenen, and L. M. Dicks. 2008. Adhesion of the probiotic strains Entrococcus mundtii ST4SA and plantarum 423 to Caco-2 cells under condition simulating the intestinal tract, and in the presence of antibiotics and anti-inflammatory medicaments. Archive of Microbiology, 190: 573- 584.
5. Charteris, W. P., P. M. Kelly, L. Morelli, and J. K. Collins. 1998. Antibiotic susceptibility of potentially probiotic lactobacillus Journal of Food Protection, 61: 1636- 1643.
6. Corzo, G., and S. E. Gilliland. 1999. Bile salt hydrolase activity of three strains of lactobacillus acidophilus. Journal of Dairy Science, 82: 472- 480.
7. Del Re, B., B. Sgorbati, M. Miglioli, and D. Palenzona. 2000. Adhesion, autoaggregation and hydrophobicity of 13 strains of Bifidobacterium longum. Letters in applied microbiology, 31(6):438-42
8. Dunne, C., L. O'mahony, L. Murphy, G. Thornton, D. Morrissey, S. O'Halloran, M. Feeney, and S.Flynn. 2001. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with In Vivo American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73: 386- 392.
9. El-Sohaimy, A. A., S. H. D. Masry, M. G. Shehata, S. N. Al-Kahtani, T. E. Abdelwahab, Y. A. T. Abdelmotaleb, and M. E. Nour. 2020. Isolation, Identification and Antimicrobial Activity of Unprecedented LAB Isolates from Honeybees. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences: PJBS, 23(4): 467-477.
10. Elzeini, H. M., Abdel Rhman A. A. Ali, N. F. Nasr, Y. E. Elenany, and A. A. M. Hassan. 2020. Isolation and identification of LAB from the intestinal tracts of honey bees, Apis mellifera L., in Egypt. Journal of Apicultural Research,60: 1-9.
11. FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Meeting. 2001. Safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food (No. 74). Food & Agriculture Organization.
12. Felis, G. E., A. Deriu, P. Molicotti, L. A. Sechi, F. Dellaglio, and S. Zanetti. 2007. Identification and functional characterization of Lactobacillus strains isolated from milk. International Dairy Journal, 17:1312-1320
13. Gheisari, A., and M. Behjatian Esfahani. 2015. Effect of feeding different of acetic acid, probiotic, oxytetracycline and neomycin on populations of coliform and lactobacillus in pupae of honey bee (Apismelliferal). Biological Journal of Microbiology, 4(14):93-100. (In Persian)
14. Gibson, G. R., H. M. Probert Van Loo J, R. A. Rastall, and M. B. Roberfroid. 2004. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: updating the concept of prebiotics. Nutrition research reviews, 17(02):259-75.
15. Gilliam, , and D. B. Prest. 1987. Microbiology of feces of the larval honey bee, Apis mellifera. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 49:70–75
16. Goldin, B., S. Gorbach, M. Saxelin, S. Barakat, L. Gualtieri, and S. Salminen. 1992. Survival of Lactobacillus speices (Strain GG) in human gastrointestinal tract. Digestive Diciplinary Science, 37: 121- 128
17. Jensen, H., S. Grimmer, K. Naterstad, and L. Axelsson. 2012. In vitro testing of commercial and potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria. International journal of food microbiology, 153(1-2): 216-222.
18. Kaewnopparat, S., N. Dangmanee, N. Kaewnopparat, T. Srichana, chulasiri, and S. Settharaksa. 2013. In vitro probiotic properties of L.fermentum SK5 isolated from vagina of healthy woman. Anaerobic, 22: 6- 13
19. Kandler, O. and N. Weiss. 1986. Genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Vol. 2. ed. Sneath, P.H.A., Mair, N.S., Sharpe, M.E. and Holt, J.G. Pages 1209– 1234. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
20. Kos, B., J. Šušković, S. Vuković, M. Šimpraga, J. Frece, and Matošić. 2003. Adhesion and aggregation ability of probiotic strain Lactobacillus acidophilus M92. Journal of applied microbiology, 94(6):981-7
21. Lane, J. G., B. Bladon, D. R. M. Little, J. R. J. Naylor, and S. H. Franklin. 2006. Dynamic obstructions of the equine upper respiratory tract. Part 1: observations during high‐speed treadmill endoscopy of 600 Thoroughbred racehorses. Equine veterinary journal, 38(5): 393-399.
22. Li, Q., Z. Liu, Dong, J. Zhou, and Y. Wang. 2015. Aggregation and adhesion abilities of 18 LAB isolated from traditional fermented food. International Journal of Agriculture Policy and Research, 3 (2): 84- 92
23. Liong, M. T., and N. P. Shah. 2005. Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of lactobacilli strains. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(1): 55–66. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.
24. Matsumoto, M., H. Ohishi, and Benno. 2004. Hþ-ATPase activity in Bifidobacterium with special reference to acid tolerance. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 93(1): 109–113.
25. Merghni, A., Leban, A. Behi, and A. Bakjrouf. 2014. Evaluation of the probiotic properties of Bacillus spp. strains isolated from Tunisian hypersaline environments. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 8(4): 398- 405.
26. Mohammad, S. M., N. K. Mahmud-Ab-Rashid, and Zawawi. 2020. Probiotic properties of bacteria isolated from bee bread of stingless bee Heterotrigona itama. Journal of Apicultural Research, 1-16.
27. Naidu, A. S., W. R. Bidlack, and A. Clemens. 1999. Probiotic spectra of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 39:13–26.
28. Nikooei, M., C. H. Hemmati, and S. Parichehreh. 2018. Natural strategies for the control of larvae, the causative agent of American foulbrood in honey bees. Iranian honey bee science and technology, 9: 2-11.
29. O’Bryan, C. A., P. G. Crandall, S. C. Ricke, and B. Ndahetuye. 2014. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as antimicrobials in food products: Types and mechanisms of action. In Handbook of natural antimicrobials for food safety and quality. Pages 117–136. Woodhead Publishing
30. Olofsson, T. C., A. Vásquez, D. Sammataro, and Macharia. 2011. A scientific note on the lactic acid bacterial flora within the honeybee subspecies; Apis mellifera(Buckfast), A. m. scutellata, A. m. mellifera, and A. m. monticola. Apidologie 1–4.
31. Pennacchia, C., D. Ercolini, G. Blaiotta, O. Pepe, Mauriello, and F. Villani. 2004. Selection of Lactobacillus strains from fermented sausages for their potential use as probiotics. Meat Science, 67: 309–317.
32. Ramiah, K., C. A. Van Reenen, and L. M. Dicks. 2008. Surface-bund proteins of Lactobacillus plantarum 423 that contribute to adhesion of Caco-2 cells and their role in competitive exclusion and displacement of Clostridium sporogenes and Entrococcus faecalis. Journal of Research Microbiology, 159(6): 470- 475.
33. Ripamonti, B., A. Aggazi, C. Bersani, C. Pecorini, and Pirani. 2011. Screening of species-specific lactic acid bacteria for veal calves multi-strain probiotic adjuncts. An aerobe, 17(3): 97-105.
34. Rosenberg, B., D. Gutnik, and E. Rosenberg. 1980. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell surface hydrophobicity. FEMS microbiology letters, 9 (1): 28- 33.
35. Ruiz, L., A. Margolles, and B. Sanchez. 2013. Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4(396): 396–398.
36. Sabaté, D. C., M. S. Cruz, M. R. Benítez-Ahrendts, and C. Audisio. 2012. Beneficial effects of B.subtilis subsp. subtilis Mori2, a honey-associated strain, on honeybee colony performance. Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 4(1): 39-46.
37. Schillinger, U., Guigas, and W. H. Holzapfel. 2005. In vitro adherence and other properties of lactobacilli in probiotic yoghurt-like products. International Dairy Journal, 15: 1289-1297.
38. Sjovall, J. 1959. Dietary glycin and taurine on bile acid conjugation in man; bile acids and steroids 75. Proceeding of the Society for Experimental Biological Medicine, 100: 676- 678
39. Tajabadi, N., M. Mardan, M.   A. Manap, M. Shuhaimi, A. Meimandipour, and L. Nateghi. 2011. Detection and identification of Lactobacillus bacteria found in the honey stomach of the giant honeybee Apis dorsata. Apidologie, 42: 642.946
40. Tokatlı, M., G. Gülgör, S. Bağder Elmacı, N. Arslankoz İşleyen, and Özçelik. 2015. In vitro properties of potential probiotic indigenous lactic acid bacteria originating from traditional pickles. BioMed research international, 2015:1-9
41. TR, K. 2018. Probiotic potency of Lactobacillus plantarum KX519413 and KX519414 isolated from honey bee gut. FEMS microbiology letters, 365(4): fnx285.
42. Vasquez, A., and C. Olofsson. 2009. The lactic acid bacteria involved in the production of bee pollen and bee bread. Journal of Apicultural Research, 48:189–195
43. Vásquez, A., Forsgren, I. Fries, R. J. Paxton, E. Flaberg, L. Szekely, and T. C. Olofsson. 2012. Symbionts as major modulators of insect health: lactic acid bacteria and honeybees. PloS one, 7(3): e33188.
44. Vesterlund, S., Paltta, M. Karp, and A. C. Ouwehand 2005. Adhesion of bacteria to resected human colonic tissue: quantitative analysis of bacterial adhesion and viability. Research Microbiology, 156: 238- 244.
45. Xu, H., S. Jeong, H. Y. Lee, and J. Ahn. 2009. Assessment of cell surface properties and adhesion potential of selected probiotic strains. Journal of Letter Applied Microbiology, 49: 434- 442.