The Effect of Adding Commercial Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae to the Diet of Japanese Quail on Performance Traits, some Serum Parameters, Morphology and Population of Pathogenic Intestinal Bacteria

Document Type : Research Articles

Authors

1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of animal science, Agriculture faculty, laghman University, Afghanistan

Abstract

Introduction: Application of suitable feed additives can increase feed utilization, improve production and improve health. Years ago, growth-promoting antibiotics were used at high levels in diets to increase poultry performance (Ronquillo & Hernandez, 2017). However, its remnants remain in the animal's body and create microbial resistance in the animal, and humans also develop microbial resistance by consuming it. Therefore, there is a need to find substances that can replace antibiotic growth stimulants in the diet. The aim of these alternatives is to increase performance while protecting the environment and animal health (Ogbuewu, koro, Mbajiorgu, & Mbajiorgu, 2019). Therefore, probiotics such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast have been investigated as a feed additive to improve the performance and health of animals (Al-Khalaifah, 2018). It is thought that probiotics improve performance by affecting the natural microbial community and improving the absorption process in the intestine (Sohail et al., 2011). Also, symbiotic are able to work both in the small intestine and in the large intestine and have the effect of probiotics and prebiotics at the same time (Ai et al., 2011; Bengmark, 2002). Gut cognition can affect the amount of nutrient absorption (Miles, Butcher, Henry, & Littell, 2006; Rahimi, Grimes, Fletcher, Oviedo, & Sheldon, 2009) and as a barrier against disease agents (Brown, 2011). Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also known as baker's yeast, is a type of yeast that is added to food formulas in poultry diets (Elghandour et al., 2020). Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains significant levels of digestible proteins, vitamins, magnesium and zinc, whose wall has many features such as polysaccharide α-D-mannan, chitin and β-D-glucan (Alizadeh et al. ., 2016) which plays an important role in beneficial microbial balance in the gut, tissue proliferation in the gut and lymphocytes (Council, 1994). In most studies, no reliable results were obtained with diets supplemented with yeast. Beneficial effects on animal health and performance may be due to the use of detectable yeast strains and levels, diet compositions, animal species and their age (Bolacali & İrak, 2017). Therefore, in order to investigate the potential effects of using commercial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Japanese quail diet as a feed additive on growth performance, some serum parameters, intestinal morphology and the number of Clostridium perfringens and E-coli bacteria. It was done in the waste.
Materials and Methods This experiment was conducted in order to investigate the effect of different levels of Chitacell commercial yeast on performance, carcass characteristics, intestinal morphology and blood parameters in the form of a completely randomized design with 7 treatments, 6 replications and 12 chicken in each experimental unit and a total of 504 chicken. One day Japanese quail mixed of two sexes was performed. At the end of the experiment (d 35), 2 Japanese quails from each replicate were weighed and slaughtered. Visceral and lymphoid organs were also weighed and recorded. About 8g of the contents from duodenum, jejunum and ileum were collected in 80 mL physiological saline for pH value measurement. Blood samples were collected from the same Japanese quails used for carcass traits and were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min, then stored for later analysis at -20°C. In order to measure E. coli and C. Perfringens bacteria in feces, standard plate counting method was used. And also Duodenum specimens were collected and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution for 24 h, then embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 4 μm. The following parameters were measured: (i) villous height (VH), (ii) depth of crypt (CD) and (iii) ratios of VH/CD.
Results and Discussion: The effects of different levels of commercial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the growth performance of Japanese quail chicks are reported in Table 2. The results of this study show that the experimental treatments had no significant effect on feed consumption. The group fed with 0.75, 1.1, 1.25 and 1.5 percent of yeast could significantly increase weight compared to the control group (P<0.05). Also, the food conversion ratio in the groups receiving 0.75 and 1 g/kg of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast feed compared to the control groups and 0.25 and 0.5 g/kg of yeast in the diet decreased significantly (<0.05). P). According to the results of this experiment, it has been reported that live yeast has a favorable effect on feed conversion ratio and final weight gain in broiler chickens (Borda-Molina, Seifert, & Camarinha-Silva, 2018). Abdominal fat and thymus size were significantly affected by experimental treatments (P<0.05). Thus, adding yeast levels higher than 0.75 g/kg reduced the fat in the ventricular area, while the size of the thymus increased compared to the control group. It has also been shown that the percentage of carcass, liver, stone, heart, spleen and bursa of Fabricius were not affected by experimental treatments (P<0.05). It has been reported that live yeast reduces abdominal fat and increases thymus size. In fact, yeast stimulates the intestinal immune system by acting as a non-pathogenic microbial antigen and creates an effect similar to adjuvants. By adding the level of commercial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the amount of total protein and albumin in the blood increased significantly (P<0.05). On the other hand, cholesterol and triglyceride in the blood decreased significantly by adding different levels of commercial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast (P<0.05). Superoxide dismutase and catalase in serum increased significantly with increasing yeast consumption (P<0.05). On the other hand, interleukin 1 and 6, as well as
tumor necrosis factor alpha decreased significantly (P<0.05) with the increase in the level of yeast in the diet.
Conclusion: Results of this research showed that the use of commercial yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has favorable effects and it can also be said that the best level used is 0.75 grams per kilogram of feed.

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

  1. Abd El-Wahab, A., Mahmoud, R., Marghani, B., & Gadallah, H. (2019). Effects of yeast addition to the diet of Japanese quails on growth performance, selected serum parameters and intestinal morphology as well as pathogens reduction. Pakistan Veterinary Journal40(2), 219-223.‏ 29261/pakvetj/2019.125
  2. Ai, Q., Xu, H., Mai, K., Xu, W., Wang, J., & Zhang, W. (2011). Effects of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and fructooligosaccharide on growth performance, survival, non-specific immune response and disease resistance of juvenile large yellow croaker, Larimichthys crocea. Aquaculture, 317(1-4), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.036
  3. Al-Khalaifah, H. (2018). Benefits of probiotics and/or prebiotics for antibiotic-reduced poultry. Poultry science, 97(11), 3807-3815. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey160
  4. Alizadeh, M., Rodriguez-Lecompte, J., Yitbarek, A., Sharif, S., Crow, G., & Slominski, B. (2016). Effect of yeast-derived products on systemic innate immune response of broiler chickens following a lipopolysaccharide challenge. Poultry Science, 95(10), 2266-2273. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew154
  5. Aluwong, T., Kawu, M., Raji, M., Dzenda, T., Govwang, F., Sinkalu, V., & Ayo, J. (2013). Effect of yeast probiotic on growth, antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde concentration of broiler chickens. Antioxidants, 2(4), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox2040326
  6. Bengmark, S. (2002). Gut microbial ecology in critical illness: is there a role for prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics? Current Opinion in Critical Care, 8(2), 145-151.
  7. Bolacali, M., & İrak, K. (2017). Effect of dietary yeast autolysate on performance, slaughter, and carcass characteristics, as well as blood parameters, in quail of both genders. South African Journal of Animal Science, 47(4), 460-470. 4314/sajas.v47i4.5
  8. Borda-Molina, D., Seifert, J., & Camarinha-Silva, A. (2018). Current perspectives of the chicken gastrointestinal tract and its microbiome. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 16, 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2018.03.002
  9. Brown, M. (2011). Modes of action of probiotics: Recent developments. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10(14), 1895-1900. 3923/javaa.2011.1895.1900
  10. Chattopadhyay, M. K. (2014). Use of antibiotics as feed additives: A burning question (Vol. 5, pp. 334): Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00334
  11. Council, N. R. (1994). Nutrient requirements of poultry: 1994. National Academies Press.page (43-50)
  12. Duarte, K., Gomes, L. H., Sampaio, A., Issakowicz, J., Rocha, F., Granato, T. P., & Terra, S. R. (2012). Saccharomyces cerevisiae used as probiotic: Strains characterization and cell viability. IOSR, 1, 17-19. ISSN: 2319-2380, Volume 1, Issue 2 (Sep-Oct. 2012), PP 17-19
  13. Elghandour, M., Tan, Z., Abu Hafsa, S., Adegbeye, M., Greiner, R., Ugbogu, E., & Salem, A. (2020). Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a probiotic feed additive to non and pseudo‐ruminant feeding: a review. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 128(3), 658-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14416
  14. Gao, J., Zhang, H., Yu, S., Wu, S., Yoon, I., Quigley, J., & Qi, G. (2008). Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions. Poultry Science, 87(7), 1377-1384. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00418
  15. Ghosh, T., Haldar, S., Bedford, M., Muthusami, N., & Samanta, I. (2012). Assessment of yeast cell wall as replacements for antibiotic growth promoters in broiler diets: Effects on performance, intestinal histo‐morphology and humoral immune responses. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 96(2), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01155.x
  16. Hofacre, C., Mathis, G., & Quiroz, M. (2005). Natural alternatives to prevent necrotic enteritis. Poultry. Prod, 13, 7-9.
  17. Iji, P. A., Saki, A. A., & Tivey, D. R. (2001). Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on diets supplemented with a mannan oligosaccharide. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81(12), 1186-1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.925
  18. Marković, R., Šefer, D., Krstić, M., & Petrujkić, B. (2009). Effect of different growth promoters on broiler performance and gut morphology. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria41(2), 163-169.‏ 4067/S0301-732X2009000200010
  19. Mehdi, Y., Létourneau-Montminy, M. P., Gaucher, M. L., Chorfi, Y., Suresh, G., Rouissi, T.,& Godbout, S. (2018). Use of antibiotics in broiler production: Global impacts and alternatives. Animal Nutrition, 4(2), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.03.002
  20. Miles, R., Butcher, G., Henry, P., & Littell, R. (2006). Effect of antibiotic growth promoters on broiler performance, intestinal growth parameters, and quantitative morphology. Poultry Science, 85(3), 476-485. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.3.476
  21. Morales-López, R., Auclair, E., Garcia, F., Esteve-Garcia, E., & Brufau, J. (2009). Use of yeast cell walls; β-1, 3/1, 6-glucans; and mannoproteins in broiler chicken diets. Poultry Science, 88(3), 601-607. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00298
  22. Ogbuewu, I., koro, V., Mbajiorgu, E., & Mbajiorgu, C. (2019). Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on production indices of livestock and poultry—A review. Comparative Clinical Pathology, 28, 669-677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-018-2862-7
  23. Ognik, K., & Krauze, M. (2012). Dietary supplementation of mannanoligosaccharides to turkey hens on their growth performance and antioxidant status in the blood. South African Journal of Animal Science, 42(4), 380-388. 4314/sajas.v42i4.6
  24. Pourabedin, M., Xu, Z., Baurhoo, B., Chevaux, E., & Zhao, X. (2014). Effects of mannan oligosaccharide and virginiamycin on the cecal microbial community and intestinal morphology of chickens raised under suboptimal conditions. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 60(5), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2013-0899
  25. Rahimi, S., Grimes, J., Fletcher, O., Oviedo, E., & Sheldon, B. (2009). Effect of a direct-fed microbial (Primalac) on structure and ultrastructure of small intestine in turkey poults. Poultry Science, 88(3), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00272
  26. Ronquillo, M. G., & Hernandez, J. C. A. (2017). Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: Review of impact and analytical methods. Food Control, 72, 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.001
  27. Sakamoto, K., Hirose, H., Onizuka, A., Hayashi, M., Futamura, N., Kawamura, Y., & Ezaki, T. (2000). Quantitative study of changes in intestinal morphology and mucus gel on total parenteral nutrition in rats. Journal of Surgical Research, 94(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2000.5937
  28. Smith, S., Wang, J., Fanning, S., & McMahon, B. J. (2014). Antimicrobial resistant bacteria in wild mammals and birds: A coincidence or cause for concern? Irish Veterinary Journal, 67(1), 1-3. doi:10.1186/2046-0481-67-8
  29. Sohail, M., Rahman, Z., Ijaz, A., Yousaf, M., Ashraf, K., Yaqub, T., & Rehman, H. (2011). Single or combined effects of mannan-oligosaccharides and probiotic supplements on the total oxidants, total antioxidants, enzymatic antioxidants, liver enzymes, and serum trace minerals in cyclic heat-stressed broilers. Poultry Science, 90(11), 2573-2577. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01502
  30. Tomaszewska, E., Dobrowolski, P., Muszyński, S., Kwiecień, M., Kasperek, K., Knaga, S., & Grela, E. (2018). Intestinal mucosa develops in a sex-dependent manner in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) fed Saccharomyces cerevisiae. British Poultry Science, 59(6), 689-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1523536
  31. Yalçın, S., Eser, H., Cengiz, S., & Eltan, Ö. (2013). Effects of dietary yeast autolysate (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, carcass and gut characteristics, blood profile, and antibody production to sheep red blood cells in broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 22(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00577
  32. Zhang, A., Lee, B., Lee, S., Lee, K., An, G., Song, K., & Lee, C. (2005). Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 84(7), 1015-1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.04.036
CAPTCHA Image
  • Receive Date: 27 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 05 November 2023
  • Accept Date: 07 November 2023
  • First Publish Date: 07 November 2023