تأثیر مخلوط اسانس‌های گیاهی کارواکرول، تیمول و اکالیپتول به‌شکل آزاد یا کپسوله‌شده بر عملکرد تولیدی، گوارش‌پذیری مواد مغذی و متابولیت‌های خون گاوهای شیرده هلشتاین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی ، دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان، کرمان، ایران

2 گروه گیاه پزشکی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ولیعصر رفسنجان، رفسنجان، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف مطالعه تأثیر افزودن مخلوط اسانس‌های گیاهی آزاد و کپسوله‌شده به جیره بر عملکرد شیردهی، گوارش‌پذیری مواد مغذی و متابولیت‌های خونی گاوهای شیرده هلشتاین انجام شد. برای این منظور از 21 رأس گاو شیرده هلشتاین با میانگین شکم زایش 7/1±16/2، میانگین وزن بدن 43±620 کیلوگرم، تولید شیر روزانه 4/3±6/33 کیلوگرم و روزهای شیردهی 12±30 روز در قالب طرح کامل تصادفی با سه تیمار آزمایشی (هفت تکرار برای هر تیمار) استفاده گردید. جیره‌های آزمایشی شامل (1) جیره پایه (جیره بدون افزودنی)، (2) جیره پایه + 80 میلی‌گرم مخلوط اسانس‌های گیاهی (کارواکرول، تیمول و اکالیپتول) به‌شکل آزاد در هر کیلوگرم ماده خشک، (3) جیره پایه + 40 میلی‌گرم مخلوط اسانس‌های گیاهی (کارواکرول، تیمول و اکالیپتول) به‌شکل کپسوله‌شده در هر کیلوگرم ماده خشک بود. نتایج نشان داد که گاوهای تغذیه‌شده با جیره دارای مخلوط اسانس‌های گیاهی به شکل کپسوله‌شده، تمایل به مصرف خوراک و تولید شیر تصحیح‌شده برای چهار درصد چربی بیشتر، قابلیت هضم پروتئین بالاتر و میزان پروتئین شیر بیشتر در مقایسه با گروه شاهد داشتند. میانگین ظرفیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی کل خون گاوهای تغذیه‌شده با جیره دارای اسانس‌های گیاهی کپسوله‌شده در مقایسه با گاوهای تغذیه‌شده با شاهد بالاتر بود. گاوهای تغذیه‌شده با جیره دارای مخلوط اسانس‌های گیاهی به شکل کپسوله‌شده، تمایل به کاهش سول‌های سوماتیک بدنی شیر و نیتروژن اوره‌ای خون در مقایسه با گروه شاهد داشتند. به‌طور کلی، نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که اضافه‌کردن اسانس‌های گیاهی به شکل کپسوله به جیره از طریق بهبود خوراک مصرفی، قابلیت هضم پروتئین و ظرفیت آنتی‌اکسیدانی کل خون می‌تواند اثر مثبت بر کاهش تنش اکسیداتیو و عملکرد گاوهای شیرده اوایل شیردهی داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Mixtures of Free or Encapsulated Plant Essential Oils (Carvacrol, Thymol, and Eucalyptol) on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Blood Metabolites of Holstein Dairy Cows

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amin Khezri 1
  • Hamidreza Shafabakhsh 1
  • Ali Alizadeh 2
1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran
2 Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-E-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Natural feed additives, particularly plant essential oils (PEOs)—derived from leaves, flowers, bark, and other plant parts and rich in bioactive compounds like terpenes, phenolics, and aldehydes—have gained increasing attention in ruminant nutrition. These compounds exert antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and digestive stimulant effects, which make them attractive candidates for improving health, productivity, and metabolic efficiency in dairy cows, especially during the critical early lactation period. Early lactation is a challenging phase for high-yielding dairy cows, characterized by negative energy balance, reduced dry matter intake (DMI), mobilization of body reserves, and increased risk of oxidative stress and metabolic disorders. Supplementing diets with natural additives such as PEOs is a strategy to improve nutrient utilization, reduce stress, and support milk production and immune function. Although PEOs modulate ruminal fermentation, inhibit undesirable microbes, and promote volatile fatty acid (VFA) production, their high volatility and rapid degradation in the rumen can limit their effectiveness. Encapsulation technology, using protective coatings (e.g., lipids, polysaccharides), addresses this issue by improving stability, controlled release, and targeted delivery of active ingredients to the lower gut, thereby enhancing their bioavailability and physiological effects. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of free vs. encapsulated mixtures of carvacrol, thymol, and eucalyptol on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk yield and composition, and blood metabolites in Holstein dairy cows during early lactation.
 
Material and Methods: A total of 21 Holstein multiparous cows (average parity of 2.16 ± 1.7, mean body weight of 620 ± 43 kg, average daily milk yield of 33.6 ± 3.4 kg, and 30 ± 12 days in milk) were enrolled in a completely randomized design with three dietary treatments (n = 7 per treatment). Cows were housed in individual tie stalls with free access to water and fed twice daily (08:00 and 17:00). A total of 21 Holstein multiparous cows (average parity of 2.16 ± 1.7, mean body weight of 620 ± 43 kg, average daily milk yield of 33.6 ± 3.4 kg, and 30 ± 12 days in milk) were enrolled in a completely randomized design with three dietary treatments (n = 7 per treatment). Cows were housed in individual tie stalls with free access to water and fed twice daily (08:00 and 17:00). The experimental treatments were: Control: Basal TMR diet without additive; Free PEOs: Basal diet + 80 mg/kg DM of free essential oil mixture (carvacrol, thymol, eucalyptol); Encapsulated PEOs: Basal diet + 40 mg/kg DM of encapsulated essential oil mixture (same compounds). The trial lasted 56 days, comprising 14 days of adaptation and 42 days of data collection. Feed intake was recorded daily. Milk production was measured during three daily milkings (05:00, 12:00, 18:00), and milk composition was analyzed on days 54–55. Fecal samples were collected for digestibility analysis using internal markers. Blood samples were drawn on days 40 and 55 to evaluate glucose, urea nitrogen, cholesterol, NEFA, BHB, and total antioxidant capacity (TAC).
 
Results and Discussion: Dry matter intake (DMI) was slightly increased in cows fed encapsulated PEOs compared to the control. This may be attributed to improved palatability and reduced negative sensory impacts due to microencapsulation, which masks the pungent odor and bitter taste of free essential oils. Cows receiving encapsulated PEOs showed significantly higher apparent crude protein digestibility, suggesting a more efficient bypass of ruminal degradation and improved absorption in the small intestine. This finding is consistent with Calsamiglia et al. (2007), who reported that certain EO compounds can inhibit ruminal proteolysis, leading to increased rumen-undegraded protein (RUP) flow. Notably, the milk protein percentage and yield were higher in the encapsulated group. This is likely linked to the increased availability of absorbable amino acids, supporting enhanced milk protein synthesis in the mammary gland. Furthermore, blood analysis showed elevated total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and blood glucose in the encapsulated PEO group. The improved TAC suggests a reduction in oxidative stress, which is crucial during early lactation when metabolic demands are high. Elevated glucose also reflects improved energy status due to better nutrient digestion and possible shifts in VFA profiles toward more glucogenic propionate (Patra & Yu, 2012). In contrast, cows fed free PEOs demonstrated moderate improvements in intake and digestibility but less pronounced than the encapsulated group. This supports the concept that encapsulation enhances the functional delivery of EOs beyond the rumen. The somatic cell count (SCC), although not statistically significant, tended to be lower in EO-fed cows, particularly in the encapsulated group. This may reflect better mammary health or immune-modulating effects of PEOs. These results collectively highlight the advantages of encapsulated over free essential oils in enhancing performance, digestion, and metabolic health in dairy cows.
 
Conclusion: Results of this study showed that incorporating encapsulated plant essential oil mixtures (KaroGutTM) into the diet positively impacts feed intake, protein digestibility, and performance in early-lactation dairy cows. Notably, the encapsulated form increased blood glucose and antioxidant capacity while reducing milk somatic cell counts, crucial for mitigating oxidative stress and sustaining milk production during early lactation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Plant essential oils
  • encapsulation
  • digestibility
  • blood metabolites
  • dairy cow performance

©2023 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source.

  1. Amin, N., Tagliapietra, F., Arango, S., Guzzo, N., & Bailoni, L. (2021). Free and microencapsulated essential oils incubated in vitro: Ruminal stability and fermentation parameters. Animals (Basel), 11(1), 180. https://doi.org/3390/ani11010180
  2. AOAC. (2023). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (Washington, D.C., USA). 22.
  3. Bach, A., Elcoso, G., Escartín, M., Spengler, K., & Jouve, A., (2023). Modulation of milking performance, methane emissions, and rumen microbiome on dairy cows by dietary supplementation of a blend of essential oils. Animal, 17, 100825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.100825.
  4. Benchaar, C. (2020). Diet supplementation with thyme oil and its main component thymol failed to favorably alter rumen fermentation, improve nutrient utilization, or enhance milk production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(1), 324-336. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18401
  5. Benchaar,, & Greathead, H. (2011). Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166, 338-355. https://doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.024.
  6. Benchaar, C., Calsamiglia, S., Chaves, A. V., Fraser, G. R., Colombatto, D., McAllister, T. A., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2008). A review of plant-derived essential oils in ruminant nutrition and production. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 145, 209-228. https://doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.04.014.
  7. Benchaar, C., Petit, H. V., Berthiaume, R., Whyte, T. D., & Chouinard, P. Y. (2007). Effects of essential oils on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows fed alfalfa silage or corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(2), 886-897. https://doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71572-0.
  8. Benchaar, C., & Hassanat, F., (2025). Diet supplementation with a mixture of essential oils: Effects on enteric methane emissions, apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, and lactational performance, Journal of Dairy Science. (In Press). https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25447.
  9. Busquet, M., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., Cardozo, P. W., & Kamel, C. (2005). Effects of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on rumen microbial fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(7), 2508-2516. https://doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72928-6.
  10. Calsamiglia. S., Busquet, M., Cardozo, P. W., Castillejos, L., & Ferret, A. (2007). Invited review: Essential oils as modifiers of rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(6), 2580-95. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2006-644.
  11. Castillejos, L., Calsamiglia, S., & Ferret, A. (2006). Effect of essential oil active compounds on rumen microbial fermentation and nutrient flow in in vitro Journal of Dairy Science, 89(7), 2649-2658. https://doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72341-2.
  12. Duman, E., Evcin, A., Enginar, H., Ersoy, B., Duman, E., Kayhan, H., & Çetinkaya, Z. (2024). Encapsulation of essential oils using complex coacervation: A study on microcapsule formation and efficiency. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(3), 527-536. https://doi:10.22399/ijcesen.394
  13. Ferreira, F. J., Fernandes, L. D., Lobo Júnior, A. R., Rosado, G. L., & Bento, C. B. P. (2024). Meta-analysis of the effects of essential oils on consumption, performance, and ruminal fermentation of beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 311, 115956. https://doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.115956.
  14. Garba, A. K., Frincioglu, S. Y. (2023). Role of encapsulation nutrients for improvement of ruminant performance and ruminant derived – products. Eurasian Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(2), 109-126.
  15. Giannenas, I., Skoufos, J., Giannakopoulos, C., Wiemann, M., Gortzi, O., Lalas, S., & Kyriazakis, I. (2011). Effects of essential oils on milk production, milk composition, and rumen microbiota in Chios dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(11), 5569-5577. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4096.
  16. Hristov, A. N., Lee, C., Cassidy, T., Heyler, K., Tekippe, J. A., Varga, G. A., & Ott, T. L. (2013). Effect of Origanum vulgare leaves on rumen fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(2), 1189-1202. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5975.
  17. Khezri, A., Rezayazdi, K., Mesgaran, M. D., & MoradiSharbabk, M. (2009). Effect of different rumen-degradable carbohydrates on rumen fermentation, nitrogen metabolism and lactation performance of Holstein dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 22(5), 651-658.
  18. Kholif, E., & Olafadehan, O. A. (2021). Essential oils and phytogenic feed additives in ruminant diet: Chemistry, ruminal microbiota and fermentation, feed utilization and productive performance. Phytochemistry Reviews, 20, 1087-1108. https://doi:10.1007/s11101-021-09753-0.
  19. Khiaosa-Ard, R., & Zebeli, Q. (2013). Meta-analysis of the effects of essential oils and their bioactive compounds on rumen fermentation characteristics and feed efficiency in ruminants. Journal of Animal Science, 91(4), 1819-1830. https:// doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5691.
  20. Khurana, R., Salami, S. A., Poblete, R. B.  Fischer, A., Cofré, L. A., Bustos, V., & Tas, B.M., (2024). Effect of a garlic and citrus extract supplement on the lactation performance and carbon footprint of dairy cows under grazing conditions in chile. Animals (Basel), 14, 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14010165.
  21. Kung, L., Williams, P., Schmidt, R. J., & Hu, W. (2008). A blend of essential plant oils used as an additive to alter silage fermentation or used as a feed additive for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(12), 4793-4800. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2008-1402.
  22. McEwan, N. R., Graham, R. C., Wallace, R. J., Losa, R., Williams, P., & Newbold, C. J. (2002). Effect of essential oils on ammonia production by rumen microbes. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 42(Suppl 1), S65.
  23. McIntosh, F. M., Williams, P., Losa, R., Wallace, R. J., & Beever, D. A. (2003). Newbold CJ. Effects of essential oils on ruminal microorganisms and their protein metabolism. Appliled Environmental Microbiology, 69(8), 5011-4. https://doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.5011-5014.2003.
  24. Moodi, D., Khezri, A., Naserian, A. A., Ghazizadeh-Ahsae, M., Dayani, O., & Bahrampour, V. (2025).Predicting blood beta-hydroxybutyric acid in dairy cow herds through machine learning-based feature selection: On-farm data basis. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies, 13(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.22103/JLST.2025.24546.1589.
  25. NASEM, (2021). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 8th Revised Edition National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. USA.
  26. Patra, A. K., & Yu, Z. (2012). Effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation by, and abundance and diversity of, rumen microbial populations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(12), 4271-4280. https://doi: 10.1128/AEM.00309-12.
  27. Saeedi, S., Dayani, O., Tahmasbi, R., & Khezri, A. (2017). Effect of supplementation of calf starter with fennel powder on performance, weaning age and fermentation characteristics in Holstein dairy calves. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berlin), 101(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12511
  28. Statistical Analysis System. (2009). Users Guide: Statistics, Version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
  29. Spanghero, M., Robinson, P. H., Zanfi, C., & Fabbro, C. (2009). Effect of increasing doses of a microencapsulated blend of essential oils on performance of lactating primiparous dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technolgy, 153, 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.004.
  30. Tager, L. R., & Krause, K. M. (2011). Effects of essential oils on rumen fermentation, milk production, and feeding behavior in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(5), 2455-2464. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3505.
  31. Vankeulen, J, & Young, B. A. (1977). Evaluation of acid in soluble ash as natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, 44, 282-287. https://doi:10.2527/jas1977.442282x
  32. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
  33. Wallace, R. J. (2004). Antimicrobial properties of plant secondary metabolites. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 621-629. https://doi: 10.1079/PNS2004393.
  34. Yang, W. Z., Beauchemin, K. A., & Rode, L. M. (2020). Effects of dietary essential oils on ruminal fermentation, digestion, and milk production in lactating dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 267, 114533.
  35. Yang, W. Z., Benchaar, C., Ametaj, B. N., Chaves, A. V., He, M. L., & McAllister, T. A. (2007). Effects of garlic and juniper berry essential oils on ruminal fermentation and on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(12), 5671-5681. https://doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0369.
CAPTCHA Image