مقایسه اثرات پودر زرشک با سین‌بیوتیک و آنتی‌بیوتیک ویرجینیامایسین بر عملکرد و پاسخ ایمنی جوجه‌های گوشتی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- تغذیه طیور

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی ، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه لرستان، لرستان، ایران.

2 گروه علوم دامی ، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران.

چکیده

این آزمایش به منظور مقایسه‌ اثرات افزودن زرشک، سین‌بیوتیک و آنتی‌بیوتیک به جیره بر عملکرد و پاسخ ایمنی جوجه‌های گوشتی انجام شد. 200 قطعه جوجه خروس یکروزه (راس 308) در یک طرح بلوک کامل تصادفی، به پنج تیمار و پنج تکرار به ازای هر تیمار تقسیم شدند. تیمارهای آزمایشی شامل جیره شاهد (بدون افزودنی)، 15/0 درصد سین‌بیوتیک (بایومین)، 02/0 درصد آنتی بیوتیک (ویرجینیامایسین) و 1 و 2 درصد پودر زرشک بود. نتایج نشان داد جوجه‌های تغذیه شده با جیره‌های حاوی سین بیوتیک کمترین مصرف خوراک را نسبت به دیگر تیمارها داشتند. بالاترین افزایش وزن به ترتیب در تیمارهای تغذیه شده با آنتی بیوتیک و سین بیوتیک مشاهده شد. همه تیمارهای آزمایشی به جز تیمار 1 درصد زرشک بهبود معنی‌دار ضریب تبدیل غذایی، کاهش میزان هتروفیل و نسبت هتروفیل به لنفوسیت‌ها را در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد داشتند. جوجه های تغذیه شده با جیره حاوی سین بیوتیک میزان لنفوسیت بالاتری نسبت به سایر تیمارها داشتند. اثر جیره‌های آزمایشی بر وزن نسبی اندام‌های لنفاوی معنی‌دار نبود. جوجه‌های تغذیه شده با تیمارهای سین‌بیوتیک و سطوح مختلف پودر زرشک به طور معنی‌داری پاسخ ثانویه پادتن بالاتری علیه واکسن‌های نیوکاسل و گامبورو را در مقایسه با گروه شاهد نشان دادند. تأثیر جیره‌های آزمایشی بر ایمنوگلوبولین‌های G و M، همچنین در تست ایمنی سلولی و ازدیاد حساسیت پوستی بر تیمارهای مختلف معنی‌دار نبود. در پایان می‌توان نتیجه گرفت افزودن 2 درصد زرشک به جیره سبب بهبود عملکرد رشد و وضعیت ایمنی جوجه‌های گوشتی می‌شود و می‌تواند جایگزین مناسبی برای آنتی بیوتیک‌های محرک رشد باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Comparative Effect of Berberis Voulgaris Seed, Symbiotic and Virginiamycin (VM) on Performance and Immune Response of Broilers

نویسندگان [English]

  • fateme tavakolinasab 1
  • Kamran Taherpour 2
1 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Lorestan, Iran
2 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction An experiment was conducted to investigate the comparative effect of Berberis voulgaris, symbiotic and virginiamycin (VM) on performance and immune response of broilers. Berberis vulgaris is a bush with yellow to brown coloured bark. The plant has obovate leaves, bearing pendulous yellow flowers in spring succeeded by oblong red coloured fruits. Berberine is the main active alkaloid with a benzyl tetra hydroxy quinoline chemical structure which can be found in all part of Berberis vulgaris especially in its fruit (barberry). berberine, a well known alkaloid, has marked antibacterial effects.
Materials and Methods A total of 200 Ross 308 male broiler chickens, initially weighing an average of 43 g, were randomly assigned to 5 treatments, with 5 replicates/treatment (8 chickens/pen). The experiment was performed as randomized block design and the birds were fed either a corn–soybean meal basal diet (control) or the basal diet supplemented with 0.02% VM; 0.15% symbiotic and 1 and 2% of berberys powder (BV1 and BV2). The diets, in mash form, were offered ad libitum and the birds had free access to water. All birds were maintained under a lighting control system and uniform temperature during the period. The light regime was 23 h light/1 h darkness. The ambient temperature was gradually lowered from 33ºC to 22ºC on day 28 and was then kept constant. Bodyweight gain (BWG) and feed intake (FI) were measured at 10, 28 and 42 days of age. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as feed intake divided by bodyweight gain. To assay the primary and secondary antibody responses against SRBC, at 28 and 35d of age, 2 birds/replicate were immunized intramuscularly with 0.5 mL 10% SRBC in. Blood samples (1.5 mL/bird) were obtained from the brachial vein at 7d following each injection (days 35 and 42 d). Two birds from each treatment were also selected at 42 days of age to evaluate the immune response by a cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity (CBH) test using phytohemaglutinin PHA-M (Invitrogen). Phytohemaglutinin at 100 μgr was intradermally injected between the third and fourth interdigital folds of each birds left foot. The same volume of saline solution was applied to the left foot as a negative control.
Results and Discussion After 6 wk, the birds fed diets symbiotic had lowest feed consume than other group. Highest body weight was represented in the birds fed diets antibiotic and symbiotic respectively. Feed efficiency improved significantly in all treatment groups except for the BV1 diet. All diet decreased the heterophil level and the blood heterophil / lymphocyte ratio compared with the control group. The symbiotic diet increased lymphocyte level than the other group. Dietary treatments had no significant effect on the relative lymphoed organs weights. The broiler chickens fed the symbiotic and BV2 exhibited a significantly secondary antibody response against Gambaro and Newcastle vaccine as compared with the control group. The additives used in this study failed to have any significant impact on the anti-SRBC titers of total, IgM, and IgG antibodies and there was no interaction between treatment and time for interdigital reaction to phytohemaglutinin. The results of this study are supported by other studies that similarly reported a beneficial effect on body weight, feed efficiency due to dietary symbiotic. Symbiotic is defined as a mixture of probiotics and prebiotics that beneficially affects the host by activating the metabolism of one or a limited number of health promoting bacteria and/or by selectively stimulating their growth improving the host’s welfare. It seems that synergistic effects of prebiotics and probiotics can be useful in stimulating beneficial bacteria and improving the health of the gut. Chand et al, (2005) observed the beneficial influence of barberry seed on productive performance of broilers. The improvement of feed efficiency by spices and their derivatives may be attributed to the stimulation of gastric and pancreatic digestive enzymes and /or modulation of microbial population by phytogenetic products which leads to more absorption of nutrient. The differences in the efficiency between different batches of spice products can partly be explained by variations in bioactive components and yield, composition and activity of them. it can be concluded that the potential effect of active components from spices in broiler chickens may depend on the dosage used.
Conclusion In conclusion, dietary Barberry powder at a level of 2% diet enhanced growth performance, improved resistance to stress and immune status which was comparable to that of VM used as an antibiotic growth promoter.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Barberry powder
  • Broiler
  • Immune response
  • Lymphoid organs
  • Performance

مراجع

1- Abbas, A. K., A. Lichtman, and J. S. Pober. 1997. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 8th ed. USA: WB Saunders.
2- Ministry of Agriculture Jihad (MAJ). 2015. Statistical yearbook of agriculture, Volume 3: Horticultural products 2015. Available at http://amar.maj.ir/ Portal/File/ShowFile.aspx?ID=14b717da-9a31-4aaa-982d-b8cc5803df3c. (In Persian).
3- Ahmad, M, and S. T. Alamgeer. 2009. A potential adjunct to insulin: Berberis lycium Royle. Diabetol Croat, 38(1), 13-18.
4- Al- Kassie, G. A. M. 2008. The effect of anis and rosemary on broiler performance. Poultry Science, 7(3): 243-245.
5- Allan, W. H, and R. E. Gough. 1974. A standard haemagglutination inhibition test for Newcastle disease 1. Comparison of macro and micro method. Veterinary Record, 95: 120-123.
6- AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Virgina, USA.
7- Arora, R., D. Gupta, R. Chawla., R. Sagar., A. Sharma., R. Kumar., J. Prasad., S. Singh., N. Samanta, and R. K. Sharma. 2005. Radioprotection by plant products: present status and future prospects. Phytotherapy Research, 19(1): 1-22.
8- Awad, W., K. Ghareeb., S. Abdel-Raheem, and J. Böhm. 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 88(1): 49-56.
9- Fascina, V. B., J. R. Sartori., E. Gonzales., F. B. d. Carvalho, I. M. G. P. D.Souza, G. D. V. Polycarpo., A. C. Stradiotti, and V. C. Pelicia. 2012. Phytogenic additives and organic acids in broiler chicken diets. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 41: 2189-2197.
10- Bogaard, V. D. 2001. Antibiotic resistance of fecal Escherichia Coli in poultry, poultry farmers and poultry slaughteres. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 47: 863-771.
11- Bukhari, I., M. Hassan., F. M. Abbasi., G. Mujtaba., N. Mahmood., F. A. Noshin., M. Afzal., P. F. Mujaddad-Ur-Rehman, and M. Khan. 2011. A study on comparative pharmacological efficacy of Berberis Lycium and Penicillin G. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 5(6): 725-728.
12- Chand, N. 2008. Effect of berberis lycium on performance serum lipid profile immunity and liver functional in broiler chicks. PhD Thesis. NWFP Agricultural University Peshawar, Pakistan.
13- Chand, N., F. R. Durrani., S. Ahmad, and A. Khan. 2011. Immunomodulatory and hepatoprotective role of feed added Berberis lycium in broiler chicks. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91(10): 1737-1745.
14- Chand, N., F. R. Duranni., M. A. Mian, and Z. Durrani. 2005. Effect of different levels of feed added Berberis lycium on the performance ofbroiler chicks. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology, 2(4): 971-974.
15- Chichlowski, M., J. Croom., B. W. McBride., G. Davis., L. Daniel, and M. Koci. 2007. Direct-fed microbial and salinomycin modulate whole body and intestinal oxygen consumption and intestinal enterocytes cytokine production in the broiler chick. Poultry Science, 86: 1100-1106.
16- Cook, N, and S. Samman. 1996. Flavonoids-chemistry, metabolism, cardioprotective effects, and dietary sources. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, 7(2): 66-76.
17- Craig, W. J. 1999. Health-promoting properties of common herbs. American journal of clinical nutrition, 70: 491-499.
18- Cross, D., R. McDevitt., K. Hillman, and T. Acamovic. 2007. The effect of herbs and their associated essential oils on performance, dietary digestibility and gut microflora in chickens from 7 to 28 days of age. British Poultry Science, 48(4): 496-506.
19- Davila, S. G., J. L. Campo., M. G. Gil., M. T. Prieto, and O. Torres. 2011. Effects of auditory and physical enrichment on 3 measurements of fear and stress (tonic immobility duration, heterophil to lymphocyte ratio, and fluctuating asymmetry) in several breeds of layer chicks. Poultry Science, 90: 2459–2466.
20- Delneste, Y., A. Donnet Hughes, and E. Schimin. 1998. Functional foods: mechanisms of action on immunocompetent cells. Nutrition Reviews, 56(1): S93-S98.
21- Diaz, A. M., M. J. Abad., L. Fernandez., A. M. Silvan., De Santos, and P. Bermejo, 2004. Phenylpropanoid glycosides from Scrophularia scorodonia: In vitro anti-inflammatory activity. Life Science, 74: 2515-2526.
22- Faix, Š., Z. Faixova., I. Placha, and J. Koppel. 2009. Effect of Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil on antioxidative status in broiler chickens. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 78(3): 411-417.
23- Giannenas, I., P. Florou-Paneri., M. Papazahariadou., E. Christaki., N. Botsoglou, and A. Spais. 2003. Effect of dietary supplementation with oregano essential oil on performance of broilers after experimental infection with Eimeria tenella. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 57(2): 99-106.
24- Goto, N., H. Kodama., K. Okada, and Y. Fujimoto. 1978. Suppression of phytohemagglutinin skin response in thymectomized chickens. Poultry Science, 57: 246-250.
25- Gross, W. B, and H. S. Siegel. 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Diseases, 27(4): 972-979.
26- Hajjaj, H., P. Duboc., L. B. Fay., I. Zbinden., K. Mace, and P. Niederberger. 2005. Aspergillus oryzae produces compounds inhibiting cholesterol biosynthesis downstream of dihydrolanosterol. FEMS microbiology letters, 242(1), 155-159.
27- Hassanpour, H., A. K. Zamani Moghaddam., M. Khosravi, and M. Mayahi. 2013. Effects of synbiotic on the intestinal morphology and humoral immune response in broiler chickens. Livestock Science, 153: 116–122.
28- Houghton, P., T. Woldemariam., A. Khan., A. Burke, and N. Mahmood. 1994. Antiviral activity of natural and semi-synthetic chromone alkaloids. Antiviral Research, 25(3): 235-244.
29- Humphery, B. D. and N. Huang. 2002. Rice expressing lactoferrin and lysozyme has antibiotic-like properties when fed to chicks. Journal of Nutrition, 132: 1214-1218.
30- Jazila, E. M., M. Driss, and A. Hamid. 2007. Antimicrobal activaty of Elttaria Cardamomum: Toxicity, biochemical and histological studies. Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 104: 1560-1568.
31- Kermanshahi, H. 2006. Effect of dietary dried berberis vulgaris fruit and enzyme on some blood parameters of laying hens fed wheat soybean based diets. Pages 10-14 in Proc. 5th European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy.
32- Koenen, M., J. Kramer., R. Van Der Hulst., L. Heres., S. Jeurissen, and W. Boersma. 2004. Immunomodulation by probiotic lactobacilli in layer-and meat-type chickens. British Poultry Science, 45(3): 355-366.
33- Lee, D., S. Lyu., R. Wang., C. Weng, and B. 2011. Chen. Exhibit differential functions of various antibiotic growth porometers in broiler growth immuneresponse and gastrointestianal physiology. Poultry Science, 10: 216-220.
34- Lee, K-W., H. Everts., H. Kappert., M. Frehner., R. Losa, and A. Beynen. 2003. Effects of dietary essential oil components on growth performance, digestive enzymes and lipid metabolism in female broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 44(3): 450-457.
35- Leshchinsky, T. V, and K. C. Klasing. 2001. Relationship between the level of dietary vitamin E and the immune response of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 80: 1590–1599.
36- Lucas, A. M, and C. Jamroz. 1961. Atlas of avian hematology. Agriculture Monograp, 25, USDA, Washington, DC.
37- Midilli, M., M. Alp., N. Kocabach., O. Muglah., N. Turan., H. Yilmaz, and S. Cakir. 2008. Effects of dietary probiotic and prebiotic supplementation on growth performance and serum IgG concentration of broilers. Journal of Animal Science, 38(1): 21-27.
38- Mohammadi, A., J. Pourreza., S. M. A. Jalali, and N. K. Mirzaei. 2011. Effect of sumac powder (Rhus Coriaria L.) and probiotic on performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Advances in Environmental Biology, 5: 2409-2412.
39- Motl, M., C. Fritts, and P. Waldroup. 2005. Effects of intestinal modification by antibiotics and antibacterials on utilization of methionine sources by broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 14(1): 167-173.
40- Nitsan, Z., E. Dunnington, and P. Siegel. 1991. Organ growth and digestive enzyme levels to fifteen days of age in lines of chickens differing in body weight. Journal of Poultry Science, 70(10): 2040-2048.
41- Patterson, J, and K. Burkholder. 2003. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82(4): 627-631.
42- Pessi, T., Y. Sütas., A. Marttinen, and E. Isolauri. 1998. Probiotics reinforce mucosal degradation of antigens in rats: implications for therapeutic use of probiotics. The Journal of Nutrition, 128(12): 2313-2318.
43- Qin, Z., T. Fukata., E. Baba, and A. Arakawa. 1995. Effect of lactose and Lactobacillus acidophilus on the colonization of Salmonella enteritidis in chicks concurrently infected with Eimeria tenella. Avian diseases, 39(3): 548-553.
44- Rajaian, H., J. Jalaee, and A. Aghajani. 2006. Berberis vulgaris as growth promoter in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 5(4): 395-397.
45- Rajmane, B. V. 1996. Effect of Stresroak in stress condition on broiler performance. Pageas 215-218 in Proc. 20th World Poultry Congress. New Delhi, India.
46- Roura, E., J. Homedes, and K. C. Klasing. 1992. Prevention of immunologic stress contributes to the growth-permitting ability of dietary antibiotics in chicks. The Journal of Nutrition, 122(12): 2383.
47- Sarica, S., A. Ciftci., E. Demir., K. Kilinc, and Y. Yildirim. 2005. Use of antibiotic growth promoter and two herbal natural feed additives with and without exogenous enzymes in wheat based broiler diets. South African Journal of Animal Science, 35: 61-72.
48- SAS Institute. 2001. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 8.SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
49- Savage, T. F., P. F. Cotter, and E. I. Zakrzewska. 1996. The effect of feeding mannanoligosaccharide on immunoglobulins, plasma IgG and bile IgA of wrolstad MW male turkeys. Poultry Science, 75(1): 143-149.
50- Sharifi, S. D., S. H. Khorsandi., A. A. Khadem., A. Salehi, and H. Moslehi. 2013. The effect of four medicinal plants on the performance, blood biochemical traits and ileal microflora of broiler chicks. Veterinarski arhiv, 83(1): 69-80.
51- Siddons, R., and M. E. Coates. 1972. The influence of the intestinal microflora on disaccharidase activities in the chick. British Journal of Nutrition, 27(01): 101-112.
52- Singh, M., S. Chauhan, and P. Kumar. 2008. Effect of supplementation of diets with BMD and virginiamycin on the growth performance, carcass characteristics and bacterial population in broiler chickens. Veterinary World, 1(5): 141-143.
53- Slizewska, K., A. Nowak., Z. Libudzisz, and J. Blasiak. 2010. Probiotic preparation reduces the fecal water genotoxicity in chickens fed with aflatoxin B1 contaminated fodder. Research in Veterinary Science, 89: 391–395.
54- Spring, P., C. Wenk., K. A. Dawson, and K. E. Newman. 2000. The effects of dietary mannaoligosaccharides on cecal parameters and the concentrations of enteric bacteria in the ceca of salmonella-challenged broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 79: 205–211.
55- Yeo, J, and K. I. Kim.1997. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 76(2): 381-385.
56- Yosefi Mask, S., R. Bahari Kashani., H. Sarire, and B. Ezadkhah. 2012. The effect of barberry seeds on some carcass parameter in broiler. 2nd scientific conference of specialized poultry industry, Qom, Iran. (In Persian).
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 اردیبهشت 1395
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 اردیبهشت 1395
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 01 تیر 1396

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار