Determination of Nutritional Value and Nutrients Digestibility of Diets Containing Two Sources of Soluble and Insoluble Fibers in Ostrich

Document Type : Poultry Nutrition

Authors

• Seyyed Mohammad Mirbehbahani ¹
• seyyed javad Hosseini-vashan ¹
• Mohsen Mojtahedi ¹
• Seyyed Homayoun Farhangfar ¹
• Seyed Abdoullah Hosseini ²

¹ Department of Animal Science, Birjand Faculty of Agriculture, Birjand, Iran

² Animal Nutrition Department, Animal Science Research Institute, Karaj, Iran.

10.22067/ijasr.v12i4.81693

Abstract

Introduction[1] Like to broiler chickens most of the ostrich breeding cost is related to the price of nutrition. Given the higher ability of ostriches to using the dietary fiber, it is expected that the using of cheaper feeds may be provide diet with lower prices. Agricultural by-products such as sugar beet pulp and various types of brans are rich sources of fibers, each with different percentages of soluble and insoluble fibers. Ostrich (Struthio camelus) has a long rectum (about 8 meters) that occupies about 57 % of the length of its gastrointestinal tract, but in the broiler chicken the rectum is only about 3 % of gut tract. The microorganisms in the ostrich^'s large intestine can digest 38% of cellulose and 68% of hemicellulose. The dietary fiber is divided into two types of water-soluble and water-insoluble. The water-insoluble fibers are including cellulose, lignin and a part of hemicellulose. Due to the higher passage rate of the digestive tract, they are less fermentable than soluble fibers. Water-soluble fibers are mainly including pectin, gum, and mucilage. Soluble fibers reduce the contact of enzymes with digesta, due to increase viscosity, thereby reducing digestion and absorption of nutrients in the gastrointestinal tract. Due to the fact that the effect of soluble and insoluble fibers in the digestive tract is different from each other and so far no research has been done on the effect of fiber source in ostriches. This study was aimed to determine the nutritional value and digestibility of nutrients of diets containing two fiber sources soluble and insoluble in ostrich chicks.     
Materials and Methods In order to evaluate the feasibility of using the higher levels of soluble and insoluble fibers in ostrich^’s diet, this experiment was undertaken using 30 ostrich chicks in a completely randomize design with 5 treatments and 6 replicates in each treatments (one bird in each replicate) in three periods; prestarter (1- 2 months), starter (2- 4 months) and grower (4-6 months). The experimental treatments were as follows: 1-Control diet with standard fiber level, 2- Treatment contains 2% more soluble fiber than control (sugar beet pulp as the source of soluble fiber), 3- Treatment contains 4% more soluble fiber than control (Sugar beet pulp as a source of soluble fiber), 4- Treatment contains 2% more insoluble fiber than control (wheat bran as a source of insoluble fiber) and 5- Treatment contains 4% more insoluble fiber than control (wheat bran as a source of insoluble fiber). A total 30 ostrich chicks were reared at an average weight of 3082± 202.37 grams in cages. In order to determine the digestibility of nutrients, AME and AMEn, the total excreta were collected. Nutrients contents of feed and excreta were measured according to AOAC (1997) methods. The raw energy of feed and excreta was measured by the calorimeter bomb apparatus. Megazim kit was used to measure the total dietary fiber (AOAC Official Method 991.43). The amount of soluble fiber was calculated by subtracting the insoluble fiber from total dietary fiber. Data were analyzed using SAS software (2002) using mixed procedure for repeated measurements with a significance level of 0.05 by Tukey Cramer method.
Results and Discussion Data showed that fiber source had no effect on nutrient digestibility. Ostrich rectum is longer than its small intestine (the rectum occupies 57% of the digestive tract and small intestine occupies 29% of the digestive tract) and a good place to ferment the plant fibers. Fiber digestive bacteria such as fibrobacter succinogenes and ruminococcus flavafaciens in ostrich^'s ceca and other fermenter bacteria in the ostrich^'s rectum enable it to have the proper ability to utilize fiber sources. Since the beginning of the experiment was from the age of one month, ostrich chicks had sufficient ability to use different fiber sources. The difference in the rate of digestive contents through the consumption of soluble or insoluble fiber sources had no significant effect on digestibility of nutrients. Soluble and insoluble fibers digestibility and ash digestibility increased with ageing (p < 0.0001). As birds age increase the bacterial activity increase in the rectum and ceca. There was no significant difference in AME in treatments that had more soluble fiber compared with the control group, but AME and AMEn increased significantly with increasing insoluble fiber compared to treatments that had more soluble fiber (p < 0.0001). Which is probably related to the effect of insoluble fiber in the small intestine. Insoluble fiber diets improve the efficiency of nutrients utilization due to increasing the villi height to crypt depth ratio, therefore increased AME and AMEn. The differences in AME and AMEn with consumption of insoluble fiber source in comparison with other treatments are related to the greater effect of different fiber sources on the small intestine. Insoluble fiber decreases the viscosity of digestive contents and increases the effect of digestive enzymes secreted from intestinal cells (such as alpha amylase) and improve the digestion of starch and other nutrients and increase the energy obtaining from the diet by the ostriches. AMEn significantly increased with aging that may due to the increase of the activity of older birds, increase the energy required for maintenance and activity and hence more consumption of energy by the bird. The microbial population of the cecum and colon of the ostrich (from 3 weeks onwards) is similar to the rumen, which has the ability to ferment the fiber and produce volatile fatty acids, which these volatile fatty acids provide part of the metabolizable energy.
Conclusion According to the results of this study, a suitable range for soluble and insoluble fibers in ostriches diets from one to two months old were suggested to be 7.5 to 11.5 percent and 16 to 20 percent, at the age of 2 to 4 months 7.6 to 11.6 percent and 20 to 24 percent and at the age of 4 to 6 months 8.25 to 12.25 percent and 25.5 to 29.5 percent, respectively.

Keywords

• Fermentation
• Large intestine
• Ostrich
• Protein
• Volatile fatty acid

20.1001.1.20083106.1399.12.4.6.9

---

References

1-            Angel, C. R. 1993. Age change in the digestibility of nutrients in ostriches and nutrient profiles of ostrich and emu eggs as indicators of nutritional status of the hen and chick. Proceedings of the Association of AvianVeterinarians. August 31- September 4, Nashville, Tennessee.

2-            Ayaz, M., M. Shivazad, M. H. Shahir, A. Hajibabaei, and S. A. Hosseini. 2013. Determination of apparent and true metabolizable energy of beet pulp fed to ostrich, assessed via marker and total excreta collection methods. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 44 (2): 187-195. (In Persian)

3-            Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1997. Official Methods of Analysis. 16^thed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.    

4-            Baye, K., J.-P. Guyot, and C. Mouquet-Rivier. 2017. The unresolved role of dietary fibers on mineral absorption. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 57(5): 949-957.

5-            Brand, T., J. Engelbrecht, J. van der Merwe, and L. Hoffman. 2018. Feed preference of grower ostriches consuming diets differing in Lupinus angustifolius inclusion levels. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(1): 170-185.

6-            Cilliers, S. C. 1994. Evaluation of feedstuffs and the metabolisable energy and amino acid requirements for maintenance and growth in ostriches (Struthio camelus). Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

7-            Cooper, R.G. and K.M. Mahroze. 2004. Anatomy and physiology of the gastro‐intestinal tract and growth curves of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Animal Science Journal, 75(6): 491-498.

8-            Deeming, D.C., and N. B. Bubier. 1999. Behaviour in Natural and Captive Environments. In: The ostrich: biology, production and health, pp. 82–105 (ed. D. C. Deeming). CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.

9-            Department of Agriculture. 2001. Guidelines for the composition of animal feeds. Department of Agriculture, Pretoria, South Africa.

10-         Dhingra, D., M. Michael, H. Rajput, and R. Patil. 2012. Dietary fibre in foods: a     review.  Journal of Food Science and Technology, 49(3): 255-266.

11-         Du Preez, J. J. 1991. Ostrich nutrition and management. In: Farrell DJ (ed.), Recent       Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, pp. 278-291. University of New England, Armidale.

12-         Fadel, J., E. DePeters, and A, Arosemena. 2000. Comparison and digestibility of beet pulp with and without molasses and dried using three methods. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 85 (1): 121-129.

13-         Farrell, D., E. Thomson, J. Du Preez, and J. Hayes. 1991. The estimation of endogenous excreta and the measurement of metabolisable energy in poultry feedstuffs using four feeding systems, four assay methods and four diets. British Poultry Science, 32(3):483-499.

14-         Glatz, P., Y. Ru, M. Hastings, D. Black, and B. Rayner. 2003. On farm assessment of high fibre dietary sources for grower and finisher ostriches. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2(5): 293-299.

15-         Guillon, F. and M. Champ. 2000. Structural and physical properties of dietary fibres, and consequences of processing on human physiology.  Food Research International, 33(3-4): 233-245.

16-         Hetland, H., M. Choct, and B. Svihus. 2004. Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal, 60 (4):415-422.

17-         Iji, P. 2005. Anatomy and digestive physiology of the neonatal ostrich (Struthio camelus) in relation to nutritional requirements. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, 15: 205-217.

18-         Jamroz, D. 2000. Feeding ostriches and emus-physiological basis and nutritionalrequirements-a review. Prace i Materiały Zootechniczne, (56): 51-73.

19-         Jiménez-Moreno, E., M. Frikha, A. de Coca-Sinova, J. García, and G. Mateos. 2013. Oat hulls and sugar beet pulp in diets for broilers 1. Effects on growth performance and nutrient digestibility. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 182 (1-4): 33-43.

20-         Leeson, S. and Summers, J. D. 2001. Scott^, s nutrition of the chicken. 4^th ed. Nuttingham University Press.

21-         Musara, C., J. Chamunorwa, K. Holtug, and E. Skadhauge. 2003. Insight into the mechanism of short chain fatty acid absorption in the ostrich (Struthio camelus) proximal colon. British Poultry Science, 44 (2): 316-326.

22-         Matsui, H., T. Ban-Tokuda, and M. Wakita. 2010. Detection of fiber-digesting bacteria in the ceca of ostrich using specific primer sets. Current Microbiology, 60(2): 112-116.

23-         Mead, G. 1989. Microbes of the avian cecum: types present and substrates utilized.  Journal of Experimental Zoology, 252(S3): 48-54.

24-         Montagne, L., J. Pluske, and D. Hampson. 2003. A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young non-ruminant animals. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 108(1-4): 95-117.

25-         Ojano-Dirian, C., and P. Waldroup. 2002. Protein and amino acid needs of broilers in warm weather: A review. Poultry Science, 1(4): 40-46.

26-         Rezaei, M., M.A. Karimi Torshizi, and Y. Rouzbehan. 2011. The influence of different levels of micronized insoluble fiber on broiler performance and litter moisture. Poultry Science, 90(9): 2008-2012.

27-         SAS Institute. 2002. STAT software, version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. USA.

28-         Scheideler, S. E., and J. L. Sell. 1996. Nutrition guidelines for ostriches and emus: Cooperative Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska_Lincoln.

29-         Sklan, D., A. Smirnov, and I. Plavnik. 2003. The effect of dietary fibre on the small intestines and apparent digestion in the turkey. British Poultry Science, 44 (5):735-740.

30-         Swart, D., R. Mackie, and J. Hayes. 1993. Fermentative digestion in the ostrich (Struthio camelus var. domesticus), a large avian species that utilizes cellulose. South African Journal of Animal Science, 23(5): 127-135.

31-         Swart, D., R. Mackie, and J. Hayes.1993 Influence of live mass, rate of passage and site of digestion on energy metabolism and fibre digestion in the ostrich (Struthio camelus var. domesticus). South African Journal of Animal Science, 23(5): 119-126.

32-         Van Amburgh, M., J. Voorhees, and J. Robertson. 1999. Total dietary and soluble fiber content of selected ruminant feeds. in Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. for Feed Manufacturers.

33-         Van Soest, P. v., J. Robertson, and B. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy science, 74 (10):3583-3597.

Varastegani, A. and I. Dahlan. 2014. Influence of dietary fiber levels on feed utilization and growth performance in poultry. Journal of Animal Production Advances, 4(6): 422-429