بررسی اثر جایگزینی گیاه سوبابل (Leucaena leucocephala) به جای یونجه بر عملکرد بزهای شیرده نجدی

عبادی, مکیه; محمدآبادی, طاهره; طباطبایی وکیلی, صالح; چاجی, مرتضی; میرزاده, خلیل

doi:10.22067/ijasr.v9i2.56621

بررسی اثر جایگزینی گیاه سوبابل (Leucaena leucocephala) به جای یونجه بر عملکرد بزهای شیرده نجدی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی - تغذیه نشخوارکنندگان

نویسندگان

دانشکده علوم دامـی و صـنایع غـذایی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان، خوزستان، ایران.

10.22067/ijasr.v9i2.56621

چکیده

این آزمایش به منظور بررسی جایگزینی گیاه سوبابل به جای یونجه بر هضم و تخمیر شکمبه‌ای، فعالیت نشخوار و فراسنجه‌های خونی 8 رأس بز نجدی ماده با میانگین وزن زنده 2± 35 کیلوگرم و سن 2±24 ماه انجام شد. دام‌ها با جیره شاهد و جیره حاوی سوبابل (جایگزینی با 50 درصد یونجه) برای مدت 40 روز تغذیه شدند. نتایج نشان داد که ماده خشک مصرفی در تیمار شاهد بالاتر از تیمار حاوی سوبابل بود (05/0P

کلیدواژه‌ها

20.1001.1.20083106.1396.9.2.2.0

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Substitution Effect of Subabul (Leucaena leucocephala) with Alfalfa on Digestibility, Ruminal Fermentability, Chewing Behavior and Blood Metabolites of Najdi Goat

نویسندگان [English]

makiyeh ebadi
Tahereh Mohammadabadi
Saleh Tabatabaei Vakili
morteza chaji
khalil Mirzadeh

Faculty of Animal Science and Food Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Khuzestan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction Subabul (leucaena leucocephala) is a multipurpose leguminous tree in the tropics and high-quality feed resource for ruminants especially during the dry season in most tropical and subtropical areas. Its leaf has high content of N (16 - 23 % crude protein) and Ca, a low content of tannins and phenolic compounds. The researchers reported dietary supplementation with leucaena silage could enhance feed intake, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in dairy steers. Therefore, this experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of subabul as a replacement for alfalfa on rumen fermentation and digestion, rumination and blood metabolites of Najdi goat.
Materials and Methods The eight Najdi goats with average body weight average of 35 kg that were fed with the control diet and diet containing subabul (50 percent of alfalfa) for 40 days. Animals were randomly treated with four replications. Forage to concentrate ratio was 50 to 50. The leave of subabul were collected from Mollasani and milled. Diets fed twice per day for 40 days. Daily feed intake, nutrient digestibility, rumen and blood parameters and rumination activity was recorded. Rumen fluid was collected from animals before the morning feeding. About 200 mg sample (1.0 mm screen) incubated with 35 ml buffered rumen fluid under continuous CO2 reflux in 100 ml vials for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h, in a water bath maintained at 39°C. Cumulative gas production data were fitted to the exponential equation Y=B (1−e−Ct). Partitioning factor, microbial biomass, actually degradable organic matter was calculated by Makkar. Digestibility of dry matter and NDF of the samples were determined. Data were subjected to analysis as a completely randomized design using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS.
Results and Discussion The results showed that the dry matter intake in goats fed with control treatment was more than treatment containing subabul (P

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Blood parameters
digestibility
Fermentation
Najdi goat
Subabul

مراجع

1- Allen, M. S. 2000. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective ﬁber. Journal of Dairy Science, 80: 1447–1462.

2- Allen, D. M, and R. J. Grant. 2000. Interactions between forage and wet corn gluten feed as sources of fiber in diets for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 322–331.

3- Angaji, L., M. Souri, and M. M. Moeini. 2011. Deactivation of tannins in raisin stalk by polyethylene glycol-600: Effect on degradation and gas production in vitro. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(21): 4478-4483.

4- Arzani, H., M. Basiri., F. Khatibi, and G. Ghorbani. 2006. Nutritive value of some zagros mountain rangeland species. Small Ruminant Research, 65: 128-135.

5- Barros-Rodrigues, M., J. Solorio-Sanches., C. Sandovai-Castro., A. Klieve., E. Briceno-Poot., L. Ramirez-Aviles, and R. Rojas-Herrera. 2013. Effect of two intake levels of leucaenaleucocephala on rumen frunction of sheep. Tropical Grassland- Forages Tropicales, 1: 55-57.

6- Beauchemin, K., A. B. I. Farr, and L. M. Rode. 1994. Effects of alfalfa silage chop length and supplementary long hay on chewing and milk production of dairy cows. Journal Dairy Science, 77: 1326–1339.

7- Ben Salem, H., L. Ben Salem, and M. S. Ben Said. 2005. Effect of the level and frequency of PEG supply on intake, digestion, biochemical and clinical parameters by goats given kermes oak (Quercus coccifera L.) based diets. Small Ruminant Research, 56: 127–137.

8- Blummel, M, and E. R. Ørskov. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 40: 109-119.

9- Broderick, G. A, and J. H. Kang. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. Journal of Diary Science, 63: 64-75.

10- Clavera, T. and R. Rezz. 2003. The performance of goats browsing leucaenaleucocephaa in the semi-arid areas of northwest venezuela. Revista Cientifica, 4(6): 460-463.

11- Danesh Mesgaran, M. 2009. New methods of in vitro in animal research. Mashhad Ferdowsi University Press, p 191. (In Persian).

12- Eroaram, M. A. O. 2002. Voluntary intake and digestibility of fresh, wilted and dry lucaena leucocephala at four levels to a basal diet of guinea grass (Panicum maximum). Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 15(8):1139-1146.

13- Francis, G., H. P. S. Makkar, and K. Becker. 2002. Effects of cyclic and regular feeding of Quillajasaponin supplemented diet on growth and metabolism of common carp (Cyprinuscarpio L). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 24: 343–350.

14- Ghosh, M. K. 1998. Mimosine degradation, its residual effect on milk and meat in animals on Leucaena leucocephala diet. PhD Thesis, Deemed University, Karnal.

15- Gupta, H. K, and P. P. Atreja. 1999. Influence of feeding increasing levels of Leucaena leaf meal on the performance of milch goats and metabolism of mimosine and 3, 4- DHP. Animal Feed Science, 78: 159-167.

16- Hammond, A. C. 1995. Leucaena toxicosis and its control in ruminants. Journal of Animal science, 73: 1487-1492.

17- Hassan Sallam, S. M. A., I. C. da Silva Bueno., P. B. de Godoy., F. N. Eduardo., D. M. S. Schmidt Vittib, and A. L. Abdalla. 2010. Ruminal fermentation and tannins bioactivity of some browses using a semi-automated gas production technique. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 12: 1 – 10.

18- Hindrichsen, I. K., P. O. Osuji., A. A. Odenyo., J. Madsen, and T. Hvelplund. 2002. Effects of supplementation of basal diet of maize stover with different amounts of Leucaena diferesifoliaon intake, digestibility nitrogen metabolism and rumen parameters in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 98: 131-142.

19- Kennedy, P. M. 2002. Utilisation of tropical dry season grass by ruminants is increased by feeding fallen leaf of siris (Albizia lebbeck). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 96: 175- 192. 12.

20- Khalil Wandy Behruzyar, H., K. Reza Yazdi, and M. Dehqan Banadaky. 2011. The effect of processing methods on the digestibility of forage sainfoin, degradation, blood parameters and Holstein cow’s rumen. Journal of Animal Science, 41(4): 391-403. (In Persian).

21- Khy, Y., M. Wanapat., T. Haitook, and A. Cherdthong. 2012. Effect of leucaena leucocephala pellet (LLP) supplementation on rumen fermentation efficiency and digestibility of nutrient in swamp buffalo. Journal of Animal and Plant, 22(3): 564-569.

22- Kung, L. Jr, and R. E. Muck. 1997. Animal Response to silage additives. Pages 200-210 in Proc. Silage: Field to Feed bunk. North American Hershey.

23- Liu, j. Y., W. Z. Yuan., J. Ye, and Y. Wu. 2003. Effect of tea (Camellia Sinensis) saponin addition on rumen fermentation in vitro. In matching herbivore nutrition to ecosystems biodiversity. Tropical Subtropical Agroecosystem, 3: 561-564.

24- Taheri, h. R, and M. Tavakoli Alamouti. 2011. Knowledge of Animal Nutrition. Aiej Press, Tehran. (In Persian).

25- Mehreze, A. Z, and E. R. Orskov. 1977. Study of the artificial fiber bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Agricultural Sciences, 88: 645-650.

26- Meena Devi, V. N., V. N. Ariharan, and P. Nagendra Prasad. 2013. Nutritive value and potential uses of leucaena leucocephala as biofuel. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Science, 4(1): 515-521.

27- Menke, K. H, and H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development, 28: 7–55.

28- Michael, H., L. Tavendale., P. Meagher., D. Pacheco., N. Walker., G. T. Attwood, and S. Sivakumaran. 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123:403-419.

29- Mozafarian.V. 2005. Dicotyledon Classification, 4th ed. Amir Kabir Publications, Tehran. (In Persian).

30- NRC (National Research Council). 1985. Nutritional requirements of goats. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

31- Poonam, S, and P. Push. 1994. Chemical composition of leucaena leucocephala seeds. Food Sciences and Nutrition, 45(1): 5-13.

32- Rahman, M. M., M. R. Islam, and M. S. Zaman. 1993. Effect of leucaena leaf meal and/or khesari (lathyrus Sativus) bran on the performance of Pabna growing calves. Annual report. Bangladesh Livestock Research Institule, Savar.

33- Dhaka Ramana, D. B. V., S. Singh., K. P. Solanki, and A. S. Negi. 2000. Nutritive evaluation of some nitrogen and non-nitrogen fixing multipurpose tree species. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 88: 103-111.

34- Sliwinski, B. J., C. R. Soliva., A. Machmüller, and M. Kreuzer. 2002. Efهficacy of plant extracts rich in secondary constituents to modify rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 101: 101–114.

35- Subrahmanyam, P. 1997. Biotic diseases. Pages 31–33 in Compendium of peanut diseases. N. Kokalis-Burelle, D. M. Porter, R. Rodriguez- Kabana, D. H. Smith, and P. Subrahmanyam, eds. American Phytopathological Society Press, United States of America.

36- Soltan, Y. A., A. S. Morsy., S. M. A. Sallam, and H. Louvandini. 2012. Comparative in vitro evaluation of forage legumes (prosopis, acacia, atriplex and leucaena) on ruminal fermentation and methanogenesis. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 21: 759-772. ‏

37- Tilley, J. M. A, and R. A. Terry. 1988. A two-stage technique for the in-vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science, 18 (2): 104-111.

38- Vahmani, P. 2005. Chemical composition, degradability and rumen disappearance of the pistachio by products and its use in lactating Holstein in mid-lactation. PhD Thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian).

39- Wanapat, M, and P. Rowlinson. 2007. Nutrition and feeding of swamp buffalo: Feed reasources and rumen approach. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 6(2):67-73.

40- Yadav, P. S, and I. S. Yadav. 1988. Proximate composition, tannin and mimosine content in different parts if cultivars of subabul. Indian Journal of Animal science, 58(8): 953-958.

41- Yildiz, S., I. Kaya., D. Unal., Y. Aksu Elmali., S. Kaya., M. Cenesiz., M. Kaya, and A. Oncuer. 2005. Digestion and body weight change in Tuj lambs receiving oak (Quercus hartwissiana) leaves with and without PEG. Journal of Animal Feed Science and Technology, 122: 159-172.

42- Zebeli, Q., J. Dijkstra., M. Tafaj., H. B. Steingass., N. Ametaj, and W. Drochner. 2007. Modeling the adequacy of dietary fiber in dairy cows based on the responses of ruminal pH and milk fat production to composition of the diet. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 2046–2066.