Effect of Digestible Protein and Sulfur Amino Acids in Starter Diet on Performance and Small Intestinal (Jejunum) Morphology of Broilers

Document Type : Poultry Nutrition

Authors

1 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

3 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

4 Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction Protein is an essential constituent of all tissues of animal body and has major effect on growth performance of the bird. A better understanding of the nutritional requirements of amino acids allows a more precise nutrition, offering the possibility for the formulator to optimize the requirement of at least minimum levels of crude protein by essential amino acids requirements, generating better result and lower costs for the producer. Methionine + Cystine (total sulfur amino acid = TSSA) perform a number of functions in enzyme reactions and protein synthesis.
Methionine is an essential amino acid for poultry and has an important role as a precursor of Cystine. Methionine is usually the first limiting amino acid in most of the practical diets for broiler chicken. The efficiency of utilization of dietary nutrients partly depends on the development of the gastro intestinal tract.
Material and methods A 2×3 factorial arrangement in a CRD experiment was conducted to study the effect of digestible protein (DP) and sulfur amino acids (DSAA) during the starter period on performance and small intestinal (jejunum) villous morphology.
A total number of 300 day-old Ross 308 male broiler chicks were randomly distributed to 30 groups with 10 chicks each. Treatments consisted of two dietary levels of DP (19.5 and 21.5%) and three dietary levels of DSAA (0.94, 1.02 and 1.1%) that were fed for 10 days.
For Each group and treatment, Feed Intake (FI), Weight Gain (WG) and Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) were calculated and all the data were statistically analyzed by the SAS software.
Results and Discussions The effects of different levels of protein and digestible sulfur amino acids on the mean feed intake, feed conversion ratio and daily weight gain are shown in the Table 3.
Increase in the percentage of digestible sulfur amino acids, increased the levels of feed intake and feed conversion ratio in the starter period but, had no effect on the WG. Adding the DSAA amount, higher than the recommended levels by Ross in the starter period, had no significant increase in the WG, FI and FCR. Increasing DSAA in the starter diet, although did not improve the FCR, but significantly increased daily weight gain and feed intake at the end of the period. With a decrease of 10 percent in digestible protein of the starter diet and its counter-action with digestible sulfur amino acids had no effect on WG, FI and FCR in any experimental periods. By taking the use of the diets of 20% Crude Protein (CP) and 0.641% and 0.926% of Total Sulfur Amino Acids (TSAA) or the 22% of CP and 0.705% and 0.926% of TSAA, no weight gain difference was observed from 1 to 7 days of age. Also, a 2% reduction of CP in diet of the starter period was not effective on the WG. The results of the present experiment showed that in the starter diets containing 3025 kCal/kg of metabolism energy, the levels of the digestible protein could be increased 20 gr per every kg of diet, without observing any negative effect on the performance of the broilers and in this situation extra amino acids are added to the diet.
Results of the effects of different levels of the digestible protein and digestible sulfur amino acids on the carcass parts and the gastro intestinal tract are presented in the table 4.
Increasing the DSAA, had no significant effect on carcass parts and relative weight of the gastro intestinal tract in the day 42, but the abdominal fat decreased (P

Keywords


1- Acar, N., E. T. Moran Jr., and S. F. Bilgili. 1991. Live performance and carcass yield of male broilers from two commercial strain crosses receiving rations containing lysine below and above the established requirement between six and eight weeks of age. Poultry Science, 70:2315–2321.
2- Acar, N., G. F. Barbato., and P. H. Patterson. 2001. The effect of feeding excess methionine on live performance carcass traits, and Ascitic mortality. Poultry science, 80: 1585-1989.
3- Adeyemo, G. O. 2012. Performance of broiler starters fed varying levels of dietary methionine. International Journal of Agricultural Science, 2: 143-148.
4- Bartell, S. M., and A. B. Batal. 2007. The effect of supplemental glutamine on growth performance, development of the gastrointestinal tract and humoral immune response of broilers. Poultry Science, 86: 1940-7.
5- Batal, A. B., and C. M. Parsons. 2002. Effects of age on nutrient digestibility in chicks fed different diets. Poultry Science, 81:400-407.
6- Brito A. B., J. H. Stringhini., and M. B. Caf´e. 2004. “Evaluation of methionine + cystine levels in pre-starter ration (1–7 days) for broilers,” Ars Veterinaria, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 9–15.
7- Corzo, A., C. A. Fritts., M. T. Kidd., and B. J. Kerr. 2005. Response of broiler chicks to essential and non-essential amino acid supplementation of low crude protein diets. Animal Feed Science Technology, 118:319-327.
8- Darsi, E., M. Shivazad., M. Zaghari1., N. F. Namroud., and R. Mohammadi. 2012. Effect of Reduced Dietary Crude Protein Levels on Growth Performance, Plasma Uric Acid and Electrolyte Concentration of Male Broiler Chicks. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, 14: 789-797.
9- Farkhoy, M., M. Modirsanei., O. Ghavidel., M. Sadegh., and S. Jafarnejad. 2012. Evaluation of Protein Concentration and Limiting Amino Acids Including Lysine and Met + Cys in Prestarter Diet on Performance of Broilers. Veterinary. Medicine. International, 2012:7 pages.
10- Franco, J., A. Murakami., M. Natali., E. Garcia., and A. Furlan. 2006. Influence of delayed placement and dietary lysine levels on small intestine morphometrics and performance of broilers. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic., pp: 8.
11- Geyra A, Uni Z, Sklan Z. 2001. Enterocyte dynamics and mucosal development in the post hatch chick. Poultry Science, 80: 776-782.
12- Han, Y., and D. H. Baker. 1993. Effects of excess methionine or lysine for broilers fed a corn-soybean meal diet. Poultry Science, 72:1070-1074.
13- Hesabi A., Nasiri H., and M. Birjandi. 2006. Effect of supplemental methionine and lysine on performance and carcass yield characteristics in broiler chicks. Animal Science Iran: alireza_hessabi@yahoo.com.
14- Huyghebaert, G., and M. Pack. 1996. Effects of dietary protein content addition of nonessential amino acids and dietary methionine to cysteine balance on responses to dietary sulphur-containing amino acids in broilers. Br. Poultry Science, 37:623-639.
15- Jeroch, H., and M. Pack. 1995. Effects of dietary sulfur amino acids and crude protein on the performance of finishing broilers.Arch. Anim. Nutr. 48:109–118.
16- Liburn, M. S. 1998. Practical aspects of early nutrition for poultry. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 7:420-424.
17- Moran, E.T., and B. Stilborn. 1996. Effect of glutamic acid on broiler given sub marginal crude protein with adequate essential amino acids using feeds high and low in potassium. Poultry Science, 75: 120-129.
18- Morris, T. R., R. M. Gous., and C. Fisher. 1999. An analysis of the hypothesis that amino acid requirements for chicks should be stated as a proportion of dietary protein. Worlds Poultry Science, 55:7-22.
19- Oluyemi, J. A., and F. A. Roberts. 1979. Poultry production in warm wet climates. Macmillan Tropical Agriculture, Horticulture and Applied Ecology Series.
20- Parr, J. F., and J. D. Summer. 1991. The effect of minimizing amino acid excess in broiler diets. Poultry Science, 70: 1540-1549.
21- Rezaei, M. H. Nassiri Moghaddam., J. Pour Reza., and H. Kermanshahi. 2004. The Effects of Dietary Protein and Lysine Levels on Broiler Performance, Carcass Characteristics and N Excretion. International Journal of Poultry Science, 3 (2): 148-152.
22- Schutte, J. B., and M. Pack. 1995a. Effects of dietary sulphur containing amino acids on performance and breast meat deposition of broiler chicks during the growing and finishing phases. Br. Poultry Science, 36:747–762.
23- Sell, J. L., P. R. Ferket., C. R. Angel., S. E. Scheideler., F. Escribano., and I. Zatari. 1989. Performance and carcass characteristics of turkey toms as influenced by dietary protein and metabolizable energy. Nutr. Rep. Int. 40:979-992.
24- Simon, A., Bergner, H., and D. Buivan. 1995. Methodological investigation on the metabolism oriented determination of methionine requirement of broiler chickens. 3. Degradation of 14C-(CH3)-and 35-Smethionine after feeding of synthetic diets. Archive Animal Nutrition, 47: 229-244.
25- Sklan, D., and Y. Noy. 2001. Yolk and exogenous feed utilization in the posthatch chick. Poultry Science, 80:1490-1495.
26- Takahashi, K., and y. Akiba. 1995. Effect of methionine supplementation on lipogenesis and lipolysis in broile chickens. Japanese Poultry Science, 32:99-106.
27- Ueda, H., S. Yabuta., H. O. Yokota., and I. Tasaki. 1981. Involvement of feed intake and feed utilization in the growth retardation of chicks given the excessive amounts of leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, or methionine. Nutr. Rep. Int 24:135-144.
28- Vaezi, G. h., M. Teshfam., S. Bahadoran., H. Farazyan., and S. Hosseini. 2011. Effects of Different Levels of Lysine on Small Intestinal Villous Morphology in Starter Diet of Broiler Chickens. Global Veterinarian, 7 (6): 523-526.
29- Vieira, S. L., A. Lemme., D. B. Goldenberg., and I. Brugalli. 2004. Responses growing broilers to diets with increased sulfur amino acids to lysine ratios at two dietary protein levels. Poultry Science, 83:1307-1313.
30- Wallis, I. R. 1999. Dietary supplements of methionine increase breast meat yield and decrease abdominal fat in growing broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 3: 131–141.
CAPTCHA Image