اثر زمان تلقیح در قبل و بعد دوشش بر میزان آبستنی گاوهای هلشتاین استان اصفهان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه کشاورزی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

تنش به­عنوان یک عامل اصلی در کاهش باروری گله­های گاو شیری شناخته شده است، لذا یافتن راهکارهای مدیریتی که بتواند اثرات جانبی این عامل را کاهش دهد، امری ضروری است. هدف از تحقیق حاضر، ارزیابی اثر تلقیح در قبل و بعد دوشش بر میزان آبستنی گاوهای هلشتاین در استان اصفهان بود. 2340 رأس گاو هلشتاین با نوبت زایش یک تا پنج مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند که نیمی از آن­ها (1170 رأس) در مدت زمان دو ساعت پس از دوشش و نیمی دیگر در مدت زمان دو ساعت پیش از دوشش تلقیح شدند. تجزیه و تحلیل آماری داده­ها با استفاده از رویه­ GLIMMIX نرم‌افزار SAS 9.4 انجام شد. شانس آبستنی گاوهای تلقیح شده در زمان پس از دوشش بیشتر از گاوهای تلقیح شده در زمان پیش از دوشش بود (5/1 برابر). همچنین در گروه گاوهای پرتولید (با میانگین رکورد شیر بیشتر از 51 کیلوگرم) و گروه گاوهای کم­سن (کمتر مساوی 40 ماه)، نسبت شانس آبستنی تلقیح پس از دوشش نسبت به پیش از دوشش بالاتر برآورد شد (به‌ترتیب 6/1 و 85/1 برابر). تفاوت میانگین حدّاقل مربعات نرخ آبستنی گاوها در زمان تلقیح پس از دوشش نسبت به پیش از دوشش، محاسبه شد (مقدار 09/0) که میزان اختلاف در گروه گاوهای کم­سن و پرتولید به‌ترتیب برابر با مقدار 15/0 و 1/0 بود. بر اساس نتایج به­دست آمده، تلقیح گاوها به‌ویژه گاوهای کم­سن و پرتولید پس از دوشش می­تواند موجب افزایش باروری گله شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Effect of Insemination Time in Pre- and Post-Milking on Pregnancy Rate of Isfahan Holstein Cows

نویسنده [English]

  • Rabie Rahbar
Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction The main aim of dairy farms is to increase the economic milk production of each cow in each lactation period. Therefore, the effective genetic and environmental factors should be identified and evaluated. Today, the main cause of economic losses to dairy herds is low reproductive efficiency. Any factor that causes delay or non-pregnancy of dairy cows leads to reduced milk production and calf birth. Stress is known as a major factor in reducing of fertility of dairy farms. Therefore, it is necessary to find management solutions that can reduce the side effects of this factor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of insemination in pre- and post-milking time on pregnancy rate of Holstein Cows in Isfahan province.
 
Materials and Methods This research was conducted in the winter season between 2015 and 2020 in two large industrial herds in Isfahan. 2340 Holstein cows with 1 to 5 lactations were studied. The cows were randomly divided into two equal groups. According to the time of estrus observation and calculation of insemination time, half of the cows (1170 heads) were inseminated during 2 hours after milking and the other half during 2 hours before milking. Statistical analyzes were done using SAS software version 9.4. Descriptive statistics were estimated for enumerated data with frequency procedure (Proc FREQ) and for continuous data with mean procedure (Proc MEANS). Logistic regression method (Proc GLIMMIX) was used to analyze the results of insemination (1 = lead to pregnancy and 0 = no lead to pregnancy). The final model was including the fix effects of herd-year-season, insemination time compared to milking (pre- and post-milking), age at insemination time (2 levels including less equal and more than 40 months), MIM (nine levels), interaction effect of insemination time and age, interaction effect of insemination time and milk yield level (low and high producing) and the random effect of semen as bulls.
Results and Discussion Odds of pregnancy of inseminated cows in the post-milking time was more than inseminated cows in the pre-milking time (1.5 times). Also, in the group of high producing cows (with a milk average yield of more than 51 kg) and low aging cows group (less equal 40 months), the odds ratio of pregnancy of post-milking insemination was estimated higher than pre-milking insemination (1.6 and 1.85, respectively). Comparison of least squares mean (LS Means) of pregnancy rate in cows based on the time of insemination showed that in generally there is a 0.09 pregnancy difference between insemination time in pre- and post-milking. The mean of pregnancy rate in pre- and post-milking insemination was 0.31 and 0.40, respectively. Due to be significant of the odds ratio in the group of high producing cows (with a milk average yield of more than 51 kg), comparison of least squares mean of pregnancy rate in insemination times showed a difference of 0.1 in this group. The mean of pregnancy rate of high producing cows in pre- and post-milking insemination was 0.30 and 0.40, respectively. Also, due to be significant of the odds ratio in the group of low aging cows (less than equal to 40 months), the difference of least squares mean of pregnancy rate at insemination times was estimated 0.15. In other words, the mean of pregnancy rate of low aging cows in pre- and post-milking insemination was 0.34 and 0.49, respectively. For low producing (less than 51 kg) and high aging cows (more than 40 months), although the mean of pregnancy rate at insemination time of post-milking was numerically higher than pre-milking, no significant difference was observed. Although there is a little information for the physiological factors of higher pregnancy in cows that have been inseminated in post-milking, it seems that reducing stress and consequently lower cortisol concentrations due to discharging milk of udder can be an effective factor.
 
Conclusion The results of this study showed that the time of insemination based on milking time makes a significant difference in the pregnancy rate of Holstein cows. It was also found that high producing cows with a milk average yield of more than 51 kg and low aging cows with age of less than equal to 40 months had the maximum chance of pregnancy at the time of insemination of post-milking due to reduced effect of milking stress at insemination time. Although the physiological reasons need to be carefully investigated, the findings of this study can be recommended as a suitable solution for insemination of low aging and high producing cows to increase herd fertility.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dairy cow
  • Fertility
  • Odds ratio
  • Stress
  1. Cooke, R. F., Aritungton, J. D., Araujo, D. B., & Lamb, G. C. (2009). Effects of acclimation to human interaction on performance, temperament, physiological responses, and pregnancy rates of 339 Brahman-crossbred cows. Journal of Animal Science, 87, 4125–4132. DOI: 2527/jas.2009-2021.
  2. De Vries, A., & Risco, C. A. (2005). Trends and seasonality of reproductive performance in Florida and Georgia dairy herds from 1976 to 2002. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 3155–3165. DOI: 3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72999-4.
  3. Diniz, J. V. A., Peixoto, R. M., Silva, L. O., Nogueira, M. M. B., de Freitas, R. R., Loureiro, B., Satrapa, R. A., & Oba, E. (2020). Fertility traits of recipient cows raised in the Amazon biome. Livestock Science, 240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104147. DOI: 1016/j.livsci.2020.104147
  4. Dirandeh, E., Ansari-Pirsaraei, Z., & Kazemifard, M. (2019). Comparing first service conception rate before and after milking in Holstein cows. Research on Animal Production, 10(25), 79-85. (In Persian)
  5. Dobson, H., & Smith, R. F. (2000). What is stress, and how does it affect reproduction? Animal Reproduction Science, 60–61, 743–752. DOI: 1016/s0378-4320(00)00080-4.
  6. Dransfield, M. B. G., Nebel, R. L., Pearson, R. E., & Warnick, L. D. (1998). Timing of insemination for dairy cows identified in estrus by a radiotelemetric estrus detection system. Journal of Dairy Science, 81, 1874-1882. DOI: 3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75758-3
  7. Evans, R., Buckley, P., & Berry, F. (2006). Trends in milk productions, calving rate and survival of cows in 14 Irish dairy herds as a result of the introgression of Holstein Friesian genes. Journal of Animal Science, 82, 423-434. DOI: 1079/ASC200660.
  8. Garnsworthy, P. C., Lock, A., Mann, G. E., Sinclair, K. D., & Webb, R. (2008). Nutrition, metabolism, and fertility in dairy cows: 2. Dietary fatty acids and ovarian function. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 3824-3833. DOI: 3168/jds.2008-1032.
  9. González, R., Pe´rez, C., & Alenda, R. (2004). Economic value of female fertility and its relationship with profit in Spanish dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 3053-3061. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73438-4.
  10. González, R., Chang, Y., Gianola, D., & Weigel, K. (2005). Number of inseminations to conception in Holstein cows using censored records and time-dependent covariates. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 3655-3662. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73051-4.
  11. Holtsmark, M., Heringstad, P., & degard, J. (2008). Genetic relationship between culling, milk production, fertility, and health traits in Norwegian Red cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 4006–4012. DOI: 3168/jds.2007-0816.
  12. Hou, Y., Madsen, P., Labouriau, R., Zhang, Y., Lund, M. S., & Su, G. (2009). Genetic analysis of days from calving to first insemination and days open in Danish Holsteins using different models and censoring scenarios. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 1229-1239. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1556.
  13. Lima, F. S., Risco, C. A., Thatcher, M. J., Benzaquen, M. E., Archbald, L. F., Santos, J. E. P., & Thatcher, W. W. (2009). Comparison of reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows bred by natural service or timed artificial insemination. Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 5456-5466. DOI: 3168/jds.2009-2197.
  14. Liu, Z., Jaitner, J., Reinhardt, F., Pasman, E., Rensing, S., & Reents, R. (2008). Genetic evaluation of fertility traits of dairy cattle using a multiple trait animal model. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 4333-4343. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1029.
  15. López-Gatius, F., García-Ispierto, I., Santolaria, P., Yániz, J., Nogareda, C., & López-Béjar, M. (2006). Screening for high fertility in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology, 65, 1678-1689. DOI: 1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.027.
  16. Lucy, M. C. (2001). Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 1277-1293. DOI: 3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70158-0.
  17. Lucy, M. C., Garverick, H. A., & Spiers, D. E. (2021). Management Induced Stress in Dairy Cattle: Effects on Reproduction. Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences (Third Edition), Academic Press, Pages, 913-919.
  18. Miglior, F., Muir, B., & Van Doormaal, B. (2005). Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 1255-1263. DOI: 3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72792-2.
  19. Olynk, N., & Wolf, C. (2008). Economic analysis of reproductive management strategies on US commercial dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 4082-4091. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0858.
  20. Pacak, K., & Palkovits, M. (2001). Stress or specificity of central neuroendocrine responses: implications for stress-related disorders. Endocrinology Review, 22, 502-548. DOI: 10.1210/edrv.22.4.0436.
  21. Rahbar, R., Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A., Abdullahpour, R., & Nejati-Javaremi, A. (2019). Can post-milking insemination increase conception rate in high-producing Holstein cows under heat stress? A retrospective study. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 157(3), 254-259. DOI: 1017/S0021859619000510.
  22. SASInstitute Inc 2013. SAS/ACCESS® 9.4 Interface to ADABAS: Reference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  23. Sewalem, A., Miglior, F., Kistemaker, G., Sullivan, P., & Van Doormaal, B. (2008). Relationship between reproduction traits and functional longevity in Canadian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 1660-1668. DOI: 3168/jds.2007-0178.
  24. Schefers, J. M., Weigel, K. A., Rawson, C. L., Zwald, N. R., & Cook, N. B. (2010). Management practices associated with conception rate and service rate of lactating Holstein cows in large, commercial dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 93, 1459-1467. DOI: 3168/jds.2009-2015.
  25. Schneider, P. D., Strandberg, E., Ducrocq, V., & Roth, A. (2005). Survival analysis applied to genetic evaluation for female fertility in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, 2253-2259. DOI: 3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72901-5.
  26. Van Raden, P., Sanders, H., Tooker, M., Miller, R., Norman, H., Kuhn, M., & Wiggans, G. (2004). Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. Journal of Dairy Science, 87, 2285-2292. DOI: 3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70049-1.
  27. Walsh, S. W., Williams, E. J., & Evans, A. C. O. (2011). A review of the causes of poor fertility in high milk producing dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 123, 127-138. DOI:  1016/j.anireprosci.2010.12.001.
  28. Washburn, S. W., Silvia, C., Brown, B., Daniel, Mc., & McAllister, A. (2002). Trends in reproductive performance in southeastern Holstein and Jersey DHI herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 244-251. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74073-3.
  29. Windig, J., Calus, M., De Jong, D., & Veerkamp, R. (2005). The association between somatic cell count patterns and milk production prior to mastitis. Livestock Production Science, 96, 291-299. DOI: 1016/j.livprodsci.2005.02.009.

 

CAPTCHA Image