تعیین انرژی قابل متابولیسم گندم فرآوری شده در دماهای مختلف و اثر آن در جیره با و بدون مکمل آنـزیمی بر مورفولوژی روده کوچک و عملکرد رشد جوجه‌های گوشتی در دوره 24 – 11 روزگی

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی- تغذیه طیور

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکدة کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

3 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده

این پژوهش به منظور بررسی اثر فرآوری حرارتی بر انرژی قابل متابولیسم، قابلیت هضم ظاهری پروتئین و ماده خشک گنــدم به روش جمع‌آوری کـل فضـولات با استفاده از 96 قطعه جوجه گوشتی مخلــوط دو جنـس ســویـه راس-308 در ســن21- 18 روزگی با جیره حاوی 11/70 درصد گندم‌ به نحوی که تنها منبع انرژی و پروتئین جیره‌ها یکی از چهار گندم فرآوری شده و یا نشده بود، انجام شد؛ همچنین آزمایشی به منظـور بررسـی عملکرد 576 قطعه جوجه گوشتی سویه راس-308 از ســن 24-11روزگی در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی به روش فاکتوریل 2 × 4 شامل 8 تیمار با 6 تکرار و 12 قطعه پرنده در هر تکرار طراحی شد. گندم‌های مورد استفاده فرآوری نشده و یا فرآوری شده در کاندیشنر با دمـاهـای C° (55، 70 و 85) به مدت 5/2 دقیقه با و بدون مکمل آنزیمی بودند. فــرآوری حرارتی در دمای C° 85 منجر به افزایش انرژی قابل متابولیسم ظاهری و قابلیت هضم ماده خشک بترتیب به میزان 32/5 و 61/5 درصد و افزایش وزن بدن، وزن روزانه و مصرف خوراک نسبت به تیمار شاهد شد. همچنین منجر به افزایش ارتفاع ویلی‌های ناحیه ژژنوم نسبت به تیمار شاهد شد. مکمل آنزیمی باعث افزایش وزن بدن، وزن روزانه، ضریب تبدیل غذایی، کاهش وزن ایلئوم و پهنای ویلی شد. با توجه به نتایج حاصل، فرآوری حرارتی گندم باعث بهبود انرژی قابل متابولیسم ظاهری، قابلیت هضم ماده خشک، مـورفولوژی روده کوچک و فعالیت میکروبی ناحیه ایلئوم جوجـه‌های گوشتـی سـن 24- 11 روزگی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Determination of Metabolisable Energy of Wheat Processed at Different Temperatures and Effect of their Inclusion in Mash Diets with and without Enzyme Supplementation on Small Intestine Morphology and Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens During 11-24 days

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Mohamad Reza Salavati 1
  • Abolghasem Golian 2
  • Ahmad Hassanabadi 3
1 Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction[1] Wheat is an important cereal due to high starch, available energy and protein contents and is used in poultry diets. Thermal processing is one of the common ways to increase the digestibility of feed, nutritional value of protein through denaturing the anti-nutritional compounds.
 Materials and Methods This project was conducted in two experiments at the Poultry Research Center of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
First experiment: This trial was designed to determine the apparent metabolizable energy and the digestibility of crude protein and dry matter in four heat treated wheat with and without enzyme supplementation. One hundred twenty mixed sex day-old broiler chicks were fed standard starter (0-10d) and grower (11-15d) diets, 96 of them were divided into 48 groups of two each and randomly assigned to 48 metabolic cages on day 15. Eight diets in which the sole source of energy and protein was wheat, were prepared and each was randomly fed to six replicates of two chicks each from 15-21d. At 18th day of age, 12 hours of starvation were imposed on all chicks; then trays were placed under each cage and feeds were supplied to all cages for 72 hours when the 2nd 12 hours of starvation was imposed and the collection of excreta continued until the end of the second starvation period. The amount of feed consumed by chicks in each cage in three days was determined by the differences of feed supplied and remained. Excreta collected from each cage was placed in a room air flow for 48 hours and then placed in an oven at 60°C for 72 hours to dry completely.
Second experiment: in this trial, 576 birds (11d) were divided into two groups, (male and female) from which six males and six females were randomly assigned to one of the 48 pens. To prepare 8 experimental diets, only one grower diet (11-24days) containing 70.11% wheat was formulated based on Ross 308 nutrients recommendation and an untreated and three heat treated wheat with and without enzyme supplementation (Rovabio) were replaced to prepare the 8 diets. The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with factorial (2×4) arrangement with 6 replicates of 12 birds each. Diets were randomly assigned to 48 pens in a way that each diet fed 6 replicate birds. On the final day of the trial (24d), one male bird from each replicate group was weighed and slaughtered. The carcass, breast, thighs, back, wings and neck, as well as the weight of internal organs including the heart, spleen, proventriculus, gizzard, liver, pancreas, bursa fabrisius, abdominal fat, duodenum, jejunum and ileum were measured. Duodenum, jejunum and ileum length were also measured. To evaluate the effect of different untreated and heat treated wheat at different temperatures with and without enzyme supplementation on the microbial condition of the digestive contents of the ileum digesta on 24d, about 3 grams of the contents of the ileum region from each slaughtered chicken transferred to the sterile tube containing 9 ml of buffer phosphate and placed in an ice flask and transferred to laboratory.
Results and Discussion Thermal treatment significantly improved the apparent metabolizable energy, digestibility of crude protein and dry matter of wheat, so that the highest apparent metabolizable energy and dry matter of wheat was obtained when wheat was processed at 85°C. Whereas the highest digestibility of crude protein in wheat was obtained at 70°C thermal processing. The effect of enzyme on apparent metabolizable energy, apparent digestibility of crude protein and dry matter of wheat was not significant. The results of this study showed that thermal processing of wheat has a significant effect on feed consumption, daily gain, body weight gain and feed conversion ratio. Whereas the feed conversion ratio in chicks fed with diet containing wheat processed at 70°C was similar to those fed other diets contained heat treated wheat and was significantly better than those fed control diet. Dietary enzyme supplementation had a significant effect on body weight, daily gain and conversion coefficient, so that the daily gain of chicks fed diet containing enzyme was increased by 4.5% and the conversion factor was improved by 4.2% compared to those fednon-enzyme diet. Thermal treatment of wheat significantly affect relative percentage of thigh weight and relative weight of broiler chickens at 24 day age, so that the highest relative percentage weight of thigh and breast was in chicks fed diet contained wheat processed at a temperature of 70°C. On the other hand, thermal treatment of wheat significantly affect the relative percentage of abdominal fat, which increased compared to untreated wheat. Also, the present study showed that processed wheat did not have a significant effect on the percentage of carcass weight, back, wings and neck, liver, pancreas, heart, spleen and bursa. Also, the interaction effect of thermal processing of wheat and enzyme supplementation on the relative weight of carcass, its parts and internal organs was not significant. The supplementation of enzyme had only a significant effect on ileum weight. Thermal processing of wheat at different temperatures had a significant effect on the height and width of villi in jejunum, but did not have a significant effect on the depth of the crypt and villi height to crypt depth. The lactobacillus population in the ileum region has not been affected by the heat treatment of wheat and a negative response to Salmonella infection was observed in all chickens. On the other hand, the use of enzyme supplementation did not have a significant effect on villi height and depth of crypt and villi height to crypt depth. The interaction effect of heat treated wheat and enzyme supplementation was not significant for neither of the measurements.
Conclusion The results of this experiment showed that although thermal processing of wheat at 85°C increased the apparent metabolizable energy by 5.32% and dry matter digestibility by 5.61%. In addition, the inclusion of heat treated wheat in diet led to an increase in height and width of jejunal villi and improvement of feed intake weight gain and feed conversation ratio in broiler chickens.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Broiler chicken
  • Enzyme
  • Heat processing
  • Performance
  1. Abdollahi, M. 2011. Influence of feed processing on the performance, nutrient utilization and gut development of poultry and feed quality. A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Poultry Nutrition.
  2. Abdollahi, M. R. 2010. Influence of conditioning temperature on the performance, nutrient utilization and digestive tract development of broiler starters fed maize and wheat-based diets. British Poultry science, 51:648-657.
  3. Abdollahi, M. R., V. Ravindran, T. J. Wester, G. Ravindran, and D. V. Thomas. 2011. Influence of feed form and conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broiler starters fed wheat-based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 168:88-99.
  4. Amerah, A. M., C. Gilbert, P. H. Simmins, and V. Ravindran. 2010. Influence of feed processing on the efficacy of exogenous enzymes in broiler diets. World's Poultry Science Journal, 67:29- 46.
  5. Amuzmehr, A. 2007. Effect of different levels of raw and processing rice bran on performance of broiler chicks. Master’s Degree in Animal Sciences and natural Resources of Gorgan, 1 (2):85-98. (In Persian)
  6. 2014. Nutrition Specifications Manual: Ross 308. Aviagen Ltd., Scotland, UK.
  7. Bennett, C. D., H. L. Classen, and C. Riddell. 2002. Feeding broiler chickens wheat and barley diets containing whole, ground and pelleted grain. Poultry Science, 81: 995–1003.
  8. Carre, B., A. Idi, S. Maisonnier, J. P. Melcion, F. X. Oury, J. Gomez, and P. Pluchard. 2002. Relationships between digestibilities of food components and characteristics of wheats (Triticum- Astivum) introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler chicken diet. British Poultry Science, 43: 404-415.
  9. Choct, M. 1997. Feed non-starch polysaccharides chemical structures and nutritional significance. Feed Milling International, June Issue Pp.13-26.
  10. Choct, M. 1999. Soluble non-starch polysaccharides affect net utilization of energy by chickens. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. University of Armdale, Nsw. 31-35.
  11. Cowieson, A. J., M. Hruby, and M. F. Isaksen. 2005. The effect of conditioning temperature and exogenous xylanase addition on the viscosity of wheat-based diets and the performance of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 46: 717-724.
  12. Ebrahimnia, S. M. 2013. Estimated metabolizable energy and digestibility of Gascogen and Azar 2 wheat with and without enzyme for broiler chickens. Master's Thesis Animal science. College of Agriculture, Kurdistan University, P: 54-57. (In Persian).
  13. Farhadi, A., H. Sayyahzadeh, and A. Jafarbavari. 2008. Effect of Enzyme on diet and Corn, Wheat and Barley on yield and carcass traits of broiler chickens. Journal of Agriculture Science and Natural Resources, 16:153-167. (In Persian)
  14. Ghayour Najafabadi, P., H. Khosravinia, A. Gheisari, A. Azarfar, and M. Khanahmadi. 2018. Productive performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphometry in broiler chickens fed corn or wheat-based diets supplemented with bacterial or fungal-originated xylanase. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17:165-174.
  15. Ghobadi, Z., and A. Karimi. 2012. Effect of feed processing and enzyme supplementation of wheat-based diets on performance of broiler chicks. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 40: 260-266.
  16. Gonza´lez-Alvarado, J. M., E. Jime´nez-Moreno, R. La´zaro, and G. G. Mateos. 2007. Effect of type of cereal, heat processing of the cereal and inclusion of fiber in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers. Poultry Science, 86:1705–1715.
  17. Gutierrez-Alamo, A., P. Perez de Ayala, M. W. A. Verstegen, L. A. Den Hartog, and M. J. Villamide. 2008. Variability in wheat: factors affecting its nutritional value. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 64:20-39.
  18. Iji, P. A., R. J. Hughes, M. Choct, and D. R. Tivey. 2001. Intestinal structure and function of broiler chickens on wheat-based diets supplemented with a microbial enzyme. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 14: 54-60.
  19. Kiarie, E., L. F. Romero, and V. Ravindran. 2014. Growth performance, nutrient utilization, and digesta characteristics in broiler chickens fed corn or wheat diets without or with supplemental xylanase. Poultry Science, 93:1186–1196.
  20. Kim, J. C., B. P. Mullan, P. H. Simmins, and J. R. Pluske. 2003. Variation in the chemical composition of wheats grown in Western Australia as influenced by variety, growing region, season and post-harvest storage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54:541-550.
  21. Kirkpinar, F., and H. Basmacioglu. 2006. Effects of pelleting temperature of phytase supplemented broiler feed on tibia mineralization, calcium and phosphorus content of serum and performance. Animal Science, 51:78–84.
  22. Mathison, G. W. 1996. Effects of processing on the utilization of grain by Cattle. Animal Feed Sceince and Technology, 58:113-125.
  23. Medel, P., M. A., Latorre, C. De Blas, R. Lazaro, and G. G. Mateos. 2004. Heat processing of cereals in mash or pellet diets for young pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 113: 127-140.
  24. Moslehi, H. R. 2006. Principles of parent stock breeding. Publications of higher education institution.Applied Agricultural Jahad, 1:1-6. (In Persian)
  25. Pickford, J. R. 1992. Effect of processing on the stability of heat labile nutrients in animal feeds. Intern ational Information System for the Agriculyure Science and Technology, 177-192.
  26. Pirgozliev, V. R., C. L., Birch, S. P., Rose, P. S., Kettlewell, and M. R. Bedford. 2003. Chemical composition and the nutritive quality of different wheat cultivars for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 44:464–475.
  27. Pirgozliev, V. R., P. Rose, P. Kettlewell, and M. Bedford. 2000. Relationship between chemical composition of wheat and broiler chicken growth performance. British Poultry Science, 41:697-698.
  28. Ravindran, V., Z. V. Tilman, P. C. H. Morel, G. Ravindran, and G. D. Coles. 2007. Influence of β-glucanase supplementation on the metabolisable energy and ileal nutrient digestibility of normal starch and waxy barleys for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 134:45-55.
  29. Rezaeipour, V., M. Hasanpour, M. Janitabar, and R. Abdullahpour. 2017. Effects of two native Iranian wheat cultivars, processing method, and enzyme supplementation on performance, carcass, intestinal morphology and microbiota activity in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 45:517-523.
  30. SAS Institute Inc. 2004. User’s guide, version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
  31. Scott, T. A. 2002. Impact of wet feeding wheat based diets with or without enzyme on broiler chick Performance. Canadian Journal Animal Science, 82: 409-417.
  32. Seena, S., K. R., Sridhar, A. B., Arunb, and C. C. Young. 2006. Effect of roasting and pressure-cooking on nutritional and protein quality of seeds of mangrove legume Canavalia Cathartica from southwest coast of India. Journal of Food Comparative Analysis, 19:284-293.
  33. Seifi, S. 2013. An investigation of the effects of using an enzyme-probiotic combination on broilers performance. Iranian Journal of veterinary Medicine, 7:299-304.
  34. Silversides, F.G., and M. R. Bedford. 1999. Effect of pelleting temperature on the recovery and efficacy of a xylanase enzyme in wheat-based diets. Poultry Science, 78:1184 –1190.
  35. Svihus, B., A. K., Uhlen, and O. M., Harstad. 2005. Effect of starch granule structure, associated components and processing on nutritive value of cereal starch. Animal Feed Science Technology, 122 (3-4):303-320.
  36. Tiemouri, H., H. Zarghi, and A. Golian. 2017. Effect of enzyme supplementation on metabolic energy, digestibility of dry matter and crude protein in barley in broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 10:513-523. (In Persian).
  37. Wiseman, J. 2000. Correlation between physical measurements and dietary energy values of wheat for poultry and pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology, 84:1-11.
  38. Wu, Y. B., V. Ravindran, D. G. Thomas, M. J. Birtles, and W. H. Hendriks. 2004. Influence of method of whole wheat inclusion and Xylanase supplementation on the performance, apparent metabolisable energy, digestive tract measurements and gut morphology of broilers. British Poultry Science, 45: 385–394.
  39. Yaghobfar, A., S. D., Sharifi, and G., Golestani. 2014. Effects Natozym enzyme plus on metabolizable energy and protein digestibility of diets containing wheat and rapseed meal in broiler chickens. Animal production research, 5 (10). (In Persian).
  40. Yaghobfar, A. N. Ila, M. Deghan, and A. Kucheki. 2014. The effect of cell wall cell carbohydrates in wheat and bran in diets with and without Enzyme activity on serum and intestinal enzymes, volatile fatty acids, morphology and bacterial population of broiler chickens. Animal Science Journal, 107:253-268.
  41. Yaghobfar, A. 2013. Carbohydrates in feeding poultry. No. 978-964-04-7983-4, parts11-12 (In Persian).
  42. Zarghi, H., A. Golian, H. Kermanshahi, and H. Aghel. 2011. Effect of enzyme supplementation on metabolic energy of corn, wheat and triticale grains in broiler chickens using total excreta collection or marker methods. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 2:105-112. (In Persian).
  43. Zarghi, H., A. Golian, and H. Kermanshahi. 2016. The effect of triticale and enzyme cocktail (Xylanase & β-Glucanase) replacement in grower diet on performance, digestive organ relative weight, gut viscosity and gut morphology of broiler chickens. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 8:298-312. (In Persian).
  44. Zohari, M. 1996. New phenomena in poultry nutrition. Alishah Publishers, p: 7-8.
CAPTCHA Image