پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

ارزیابی تأثیر مدیریت تلفیقی بیوچار و منابع کودی مختلف بر عملکرد و شاخص‌های کیفی ذرت (Zea mays L.) علوفه‌ای

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
گروه اگروتکنولوژی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
چالش‌های اقتصادی، زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی، پایداری تولید ذرت (Zea mays L.) علوفه‌ای به‌عنوان نهاده مهم تولیدات دامی را تهدید می‌کند. این تحقیق به‌منظور بررسی امکان تولید پایدار ذرت علوفه‌ای با جایگزینی یا کاهش مصرف کودهای شیمیایی نیتروژنه اجرا گردید. آزمایش در طی دو سال متوالی در قالب کرت‌های خرد‌شده براساس طرح پایه بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد به‌طوری‌که کرت‌های اصلی شامل استفاده و عدم استفاده از بیوچار و کرت‌های فرعی شامل هفت سطح کودی شامل شاهد، کود اوره، کود گاوی، شیرابه دامی، ترکیب دوگانه کود شیمیایی و گاوی، ترکیب دوگانه کود شیمیایی و شیرابه دامی و همچنین ترکیب دوگانه کود گاوی و شیرابه دامی بودند. شاخص‌های مورد بررسی شامل عملکرد کمّی و کیفی علوفه ذرت بود. نتایج نشان داد که تفاوت معنی‌داری بین تیمارهای آزمایش از لحاظ عملکرد علوفه و کاهش درصد فیبر خام وجود داشت. همچنین ترکیب‌های مختلف کودهای گاوی و شیمیایی تأثیر مطلوبی بر شاخص‌های کیفی شامل درصد فیبر نامحلول در شوینده اسیدی و خنثی، کل مواد مغذی قابل هضم، ماده خشک مصرفی و انرژی ویژه شیردهی داشت. براساس یافته‌های آزمایش می‌توان ترکیب بیوچار با کودهای مختلف را بسته به شرایط محیطی و مدیریتی برای دستیابی به حداکثر کمیت و کیفیت علوفه مورد استفاده قرار داد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of the Effect of Integrated Biochar and Fertilizer Management on Forage Corn (Zea mays L.) Yield and Quality

نویسندگان English

Seyed Jalil Davarpanah
Parviz Rezvani Moghaddam
Soroor Khorramdel
Mehdi Nassiri Mahallati
Jafar Nabati
Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction: Corn (Zea mays L.) ranks alongside wheat and rice as a major staple crop, essential for its nutritional role and as a primary feed source for livestock. In Iran, forage corn production is pivotal to the livestock sector, with annual silage demand reaching approximately 15 million tons (Bazri et al., 2021). Domestic production covers this requirement, but the system faces persistent sustainability challenges. Nitrogen use efficiency is low, around 29%, compared w ith a global mean of 33%, and this inefficiency drives both economic loss and environmental damage through nitrate leaching and water contamination (Kazemi et al., 2018). Heavy reliance on chemical fertilizers, particularly urea, exacerbates these issues by endangering groundwater and raising health concerns, including methemoglobinemia and certain cancers (World Health Organization, 2017; Sidana et al., 2023). Consequently, a transition toward sustainable practices has been proposed, involving the partial replacement of chemical inputs with organic amendments such as biochar and manure. These materials have been shown to enhance soil properties and reduce ecological risks (Gliessman, 2014; Kizilkaya, 2008). Biochar, produced by pyrolyzing plant residues under oxygen-limited conditions, is highly stable in soil, enhances fertility, and contributes to carbon sequestration (Darby et al., 2024; Feng et al., 2012). The present study examined forage yield and quality responses when biochar was combined with fertilizers and amendments, including cattle manure, slurry, and their mixtures.

Materials and Methods: The field experiment was conducted at the experimental station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during the 2021 and 2022 growing seasons. The study site is located in a semi-arid zone, with a mean annual temperature of 15.7°C and a mean yearly rainfall of 256 mm. A split-plot layout based on a randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications was used. Main plots were biochar (applied or not), and subplots included seven fertilizer treatments: control (C), urea fertilizer (U), cattle manure (M), slurry (S), and three mixtures (UM, US, MS). Biochar was applied only in the first season at 20 t/ha, following earlier recommendations (Kabir et al., 2023; Qiu et al., 2024). Fertilizer rates were adjusted to nitrogen equivalence: 340 kg/ha urea fertilizer, 50 ton/ha cattle manure, 60.15 m³/ha slurry. Slurry was prepared from cattle waste, fermented aerobically with Bacillus, and then sterilized with ozone. Before sowing, soil, biochar, and slurry samples were analyzed for their physicochemical properties. Corn was planted with pneumatic seeders at 143,000 plants/ha. Irrigation was applied via a drip tape to maintain a 60% depletion of field capacity. Urea treatments were split into equal applications at the 4-leaf, 6-leaf, and tasseling stages. Weeds were removed manually, and no pest or disease incidence was recorded. The indicators studied included corn forage yield and quality characteristics, such as neutral detergent insoluble fiber (NDF) and acidic detergent insoluble fiber (ADF), which measure the amount of cell wall and hemicellulose-free cell wall in the forage. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS v9.1 software, and MS Excel 2019 was used for mathematical calculations and preparing figures. Mean comparisons were performed using the least significant difference (LSD) test at . An initial examination of the homogeneity of the error variances between the two years' data was performed using the Bartlett test. It was found that many traits did not exhibit homogeneity, so the data for each year were analyzed separately for variance.

Results and Discussion: Biochar combined with fertilizers significantly affected forage yield and quality. Biochar-amended plots showed improved soil structure and nutrient retention, consistent with earlier findings of enhanced water-holding capacity and microbial activity (Zhang et al., 2009; Yuniwati, 2018; Liu et al., 2024). Mixtures of manure and chemical fertilizers, particularly UM and MS, produced higher yields and improved forage quality traits: acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), total digestible nutrients (TDN), dry matter intake (DMI), and net energy for lactation (NEL), all critical for livestock feeding efficiency (Pedersen et al., 2017). Evidence also indicates that manure–slurry combinations support microbial diversity and nutrient cycling (Zhang et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024). Biochar’s role in carbon stabilization and nitrogen retention is highly relevant in Iranian soils with low organic matter. Slurry provided readily available nitrogen, complementing the slower release from manure, ensuring a steady nutrient supply. Results indicated that biochar mitigated excess nitrogen, reducing the risk of nitrate contamination and related health issues (World Health Organization, 2017; Sidana et al., 2023). Some reports (Darby et al., 2024) noted limited yield effects from biochar alone, but in this experiment, its integration with amendments clearly enhanced both yield and forage quality. Mixing biochar with fertilizers thus improves forage corn output, decreases dependence on chemical inputs, and strengthens soil condition.

Conclusion: Integrating biochar with manure and chemical fertilizers improved forage yield and quality parameters, including ADF, NDF, TDN, DMI, and NEL. Biochar combined with manure and slurry mixtures reduced dependence on chemical fertilizers while enhancing soil properties. Therefore, integrated biochar and fertilizer management can be recommended as a sustainable strategy for forage corn production in semi-arid regions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Acid detergent fiber
Forage quality
Net energy for lactation
Neutral detergent fiber

Authors retain the copyright. This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Abbasdokht, H., Shafaghi, A., & Gholipour, M. (2021). Effect of biological and chemical nitrogen fertilizer sources on quantitative and qualitative traits of forage corn and fenugreek in additive series intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 52(1), 61-73. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/ijfcs.2020.271663.654558
Ahmed, R., Li, Y., Mao, L., Xu, C., Lin, W., Ahmed, S., & Ahmed, W. (2019). Biochar effects on mineral nitrogen leaching, moisture content, and evapotranspiration after 15N urea fertilization for vegetable crop. Agronomy, 9(6), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9060331
Aller, D., Archontoulis, S. V., Zhang, W., & Sawadgo, W. (2018). Long-term biochar effects on corn yield, soil quality and profitability in the US Midwest. Field Crops Research, 227, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07.012
Baghdadi, A., Balazadeh, M., Kashani, A., & Golzardi, F. (2016). Effect of pre-sowing treatments and nitrogen levels on qualitative and quantitative traits of silage corn hybrid SC704. Crop Production Journal, 9(4), 103-120. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22069/ejcp.2017.10508.1823
Baradhan, G., Saranya, M., Kumar, S. M., Immanuel, R. R., & Rao, G. B. (2022). Effect of integration of chemical fertilizers with organic manures on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Research, 57(5-6), 325-329. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.CR-834
Bazri, A., Esmaeili, M. A., Abbasi, R., & Kaveh, M. (2021). Effect of biochar fertilizer and irrigation volume on some quantitative and qualitative traits of forage corn (Zea mays L.) hybrid SC704. 5th International Congress on Agricultural Development, Natural Resources, Environment and Tourism of Iran, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)
Charkhab, A., Mojadam, M., Lak, S. N., & Dadania, T. (2021). Effect of biochar and humic acid levels on physiological traits and grain yield of corn (Zea mays L.) hybrid SC704 under drought stress. Plant Ecophysiology Journal, 2(58), 171. (In Persian with English abstract).
Darby, H., Ruhl, L., Krezinski, I., & Ziegler, S. (2024). Impact of biochar on soil chemical properties and corn yield and quality. UVM Extension, Northwest Crops & Soils Program. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14849/6892
Dehghani Ahmadabadi, M. (2024). Assessing the yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays) under different levels of partial. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 56(4), 266-281. (In Persian with English abstract).
Delgado, J. A., D’Adamo, R. E., Stewart, C. E., Floyd, B. A., Del Grosso, S. J., Manter, D. K., Halvorson, A. D., & Brandt, A. D. (2024). Long-term effects of nitrogen sources on yields, nitrogen use efficiencies, and soil of tilled and irrigated corn. Agronomy, 14(11), 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14112618
Dolatmend Shahri, N., & Tahmasbi, I. (2016). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on yield and forage quality of corn hybrid MV500 in second cropping. Agricultural Improvement, 18(1), 173-182. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2016.56556
Dong, D., Yang, M., Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., Luo, J., & Wu, W. (2013). Responses of methane emissions and rice yield to applications of biochar and straw in a paddy field. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 13(8), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-013-0732-0
Feng, Y., Xu, Y., Yu, Y., Xie, Z., & Lin, X. (2012). Mechanisms of biochar decreasing methane emission from Chinese paddy soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 46, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.016
Ferreira, G., Thomas, S. E., Teets, C. L., & Corl, B. A. (2023). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility of vegetative tissues in corn for silage. Agriculture, 13(8), 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081485
Gale, E. S., Sullivan, D. M., Cogger, C. G., Bary, A. I., Hemphill, D. D., & Myhre, E. A. (2006). Estimating plant‐available nitrogen release from manures, composts, and specialty products. Journal of Environmental Quality35(6), 2321-2332. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0062
Ghasemi, A., Ghanbari, A., Fakhri, B., & Fanaei, H. R. (2018). Effect of different tillage managements on forage and grain quality of corn (Zea mays L.) under organic and chemical fertilizer sources. Journal of Agroecology, 10(2), 490-503. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v10i2.59988
Gliessman, S. R. (2014). Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems (3rd ed.). CRC Press, p. 405. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17881
Hanušovský, O., Bíro, D., Šimko, M., Gálik, B., Juráček, M., Rolinec, M., & Balušíková, Ľ. (2018). The dynamic of the ruminal content pH change and its relationship to milk composition. Acta Veterinaria Brno, 87(2), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201887020119
Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Rong, X., Zhou, X., Fei, J., Peng, J., & Luo, G. (2024). Biochar and organic fertilizer applications enhance soil functional microbial abundance and agroecosystem multifunctionality. Biochar, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-023-00296-w
Imran, A. (2024). Integration of organic, inorganic and biofertilizer improves maize-wheat system productivity and soil nutrients. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 47(15), 2494-2510. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2024.2354190
Jagnade, P., Panwar, N. L., Gupta, T., & Agrawal, C. (2022). Role of biochar in agriculture to enhance crop productivity: An overview. Biointerface Research in Applied Chemistry, 13, 429. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC135.429
Kahandage, P. D., Rupasinghe, C. P., Ariyawansha, K. T., & Piyathissa, S. D. S. (2023). Assessing environmental impacts of chemical fertilizers and organic fertilizers in Sri Lankan paddy fields through life cycle analysis. Journal of Dry Zone Agriculture, 9(1), 45-65.
Kazemi, R., Ronaghi, A., Yassrebi, J., Ghasemi Fasaei, R., & Zarei, M. (2018). Effect of poultry manure and its biochar, Funneliformis mosseae, and salinity stress on yield and micronutrient concentration of corn. Iranian Agricultural Research, 38(2), 37-46. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22099/iar.2019.5458
Kızılkaya, R. (2008). Yield response and nitrogen concentrations of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum strains. Ecological Engineering, 33(2), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.02.011
Lavagi, V., Kaplan, J., Vidalakis, G., Ortiz, M., Rodriguez, M. V., Amador, M., Hopkins, F., Ying, S., & Pagliaccia, D. (2024). Recycling agricultural waste to enhance sustainable greenhouse agriculture: Analyzing the cost-effectiveness and agronomic benefits of bokashi and biochar byproducts as soil amendments in citrus nursery production. Sustainability, 16(14), 6070. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146070
Lentz, R. D., & Ippolito, J. A. (2012). Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(4), 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0126
Lentz, R. D., Ippolito, J. A., & Spokas, K. A. (2015). Biochar and manure effects on nitrogen nutrition in silage corn. Nutrient Digest, 7(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.05.0198
Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Dhima, K. V., Dordas, C. A., & Yiakoulaki, M. D. (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research99(2-3), 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
Liu, Y., Wang, P., Yu, T., Zang, H., Zeng, Z., & Yang, Y. (2024). Manure replacement of chemical fertilizers can improve soil quality in the wheat-maize system. Applied Soil Ecology, 200, 05453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105453
Muhammad, J. K., & Saleem, Q. (2008). Nutritive value and digestion kinetics of manure ensiled wheat straw treated with varying levels of urea and corn grains. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 12(2), 103-106. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v12i2.55546
Najafi, N., Mostafaei, M., Dabbagh, A., & Oustan, Sh. (2013). Effect of mixed cropping and manure on growth, yield, and protein concentration of corn, bean, and cowpea. Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 23(1), 99-115. (In Persian with English abstract).
Nilahyane, A., Islam, M. A., Mesbah, A. O., & Garciay Garcia, A. (2018). Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization strategies on silage corn grown in semi-arid conditions. Agronomy, 8(10), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100208
Pedersen, I. F., Rubæk, G. H. & Sørensen, P. (2017). Cattle slurry acidification and application method can improve initial phosphorus availability for maize. Plant and Soil, 414(1-2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-3124-6
Roman-Garcia, Y., Denton, B. L., Mitchell, K. E., Lee, C., Socha, M. T., & Firkins, J. L. (2021). Conditions stimulating neutral detergent fiber degradation by dosing branched-chain volatile fatty acids. I: Comparison with branched-chain amino acids and forage source in ruminal batch cultures. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(6), 6739-6755. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-20054
Safdarian, M., Razmjoo, J., & Dehnavi, M. M. (2014). Effect of nitrogen sources and rates on yield and quality of silage corn. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37(4), 611-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2013.867986
Sherman, J. F., Young, E. O., Jokela, W. E., & Cavadini, J. (2021). Impacts of low‐disturbance dairy manure incorporation on ammonia and greenhouse gas fluxes in a corn silage-winter rye cover crop system. Journal of Environmental Quality, 50(4), 836-846. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20228
Sidana, B., Priscilla, L., Kaur, G., & Vatta, K. (2023). Potential of maize crop for sustainable agriculture in Punjab. Journal of Agricultural Development and Policy, 33(1), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.63066/23220457.33.2.007
Šimon, T., Kunzová, E., & Friedlová, M. (2015). The effect of digestate, cattle slurry and mineral fertilization on the winter wheat yield and soil quality parameters. Plant, Soil and Environment, 61(11), 522-527. https://doi.org/10.17221/530/2015-PSE
Singh, D. K., Pandey, A. K., Pandey, U. B., & Bhonde, S. R. (2002). Effect of farmyard manure combined with foliar application of NPK mixture and micronutrients on growth, yield and quality of onion. Newsletter - National Horticultural Research and Development Foundation, 21, 22-30.
Sun, H., Shi, K., Ding, H., Ding, C., Yang, Z., An, C., Jin, C., Liu, B., Zhong, Z., Xiao, X., & Hou, F. (2023). The effect of biogas slurry application on biomass production and the silage quality of corn. Animal Bioscience, 36(12), 1918. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0129
Turabi, A. B., Habibi, S., Kakar, K., Aryan, S., Haidari, M. D., & Alipour, S. (2024). Optimizing soybean crop performance through the integrated application of organic and chemical fertilizers: A study on alkaline soil in Afghanistan. Crops, 4(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4010007
Uzoma, K. C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Fujimaki, H., Zahoor, A., & Nishihara, E. (2011). Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use and Management27(2), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00340.x
Van Soest, P. V., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
Wang, J., Zhai, B., Shi, D., Chen, A., & Liu, C. (2024). How does bio-organic fertilizer combined with biochar affect Chinese small cabbage’s growth and quality on newly reclaimed land? Plants, 13(5), 598-608. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13050598
World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality (4th ed.). WHO Publication Library, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 631.
Young, E., & Sherman, J. (2024). Effects of solid dairy manure application on greenhouse gas emissions and corn yield in the Upper Midwest, USA. Sustainability, 16(24), 11171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411171
Yuniwati, E. D. (2018). The effect of chicken manure and corn cob biochar on soil fertility and crop yield on intercropping planting pattern of cassava and corn. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 15(2), 54-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2018.15.555910
Zarei, Z., Heidari, H., Honarmand, S. J., & Bafkar, A. (2023). Comparison of the effect of different methods and levels of irrigation and fertilization on the yield and orphophysiological characteristics of fodder maize. Plant Productions, 46(3), 411-426. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22055/ppd.2024.44098.2109
Zhang, H., Xu, M., & Zhang, F. (2009). Long-term effects of manure application on grain yield under different cropping systems and ecological conditions in China. The Journal of Agricultural Science147(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859608008265
Zoui, O., Baroudi, M., Drissi, S., Abouabdillah, A., Abd-Elkader, O. H., Plavan, G., & Bourioug, M. (2023). Utilization of digestate as an organic manure in corn silage culture: An in-depth investigation of its profound influence on soil’s physicochemical properties, crop growth parameters, and agronomic performance. Agronomy, 13(7), 1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071715
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.
دوره 18، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 66
تابستان 1405
صفحه 185-203

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 29 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 15 دی 1404
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار 15 دی 1404