گوارش‌پذیری مواد مغذی، فراسنجه‌های تخمیر شکمبه‌ای و عملکرد تولیدی در پاسخ به منبع دانه غله و مکمل روغن در جیره گاوهای شیری هلشتاین

نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی - تغذیه نشخوارکنندگان

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه شیراز

2 گروه علوم دامی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

اثرات منبع غله و مکمل روغن بر گوارش‌پذیری مواد مغذی، فراسنجه‌های تخمیر شکمبه و عملکرد تولیدی گاوهای شیری با استفاده از هشت رأس گاو هلشتاین چند بار‌ زایش (3/1 ± 3/3) در قالب آزمایش فاکتوریل 2 × 2 و بر پایه طرح مربع لاتین (4 × 4) دو بار تکرار شده ارزیابی شدند. جیره‌های آزمایشی عبارت بودند از: 1) جیره‌ای بر پایه 100 درصد دانه جو در بخش کنسانتره با 2 درصد (بر اساس ماده خشک جیره) روغن ماهی؛ 2) جیره‌ای بر پایه 100 درصد دانه جو در بخش کنسانتره با 2 درصد روغن سویا؛ 3) جیره‌ای بر پایه 100 درصد دانه ذرت در بخش کنسانتره با 2 درصد روغن ماهی؛ و 4) جیره‌ای بر پایه 100 درصد دانه ذرت در بخش کنسانتره با 2 درصد روغن سویا. ماده خشک مصرفی در جیره‌هایی بر پایه جو در مقایسه با جیره‌هایی بر پایه ذرت تمایل به افزایش داشت. این در حالی است که ماده خشک مصرفی در جیره‌های حاوی روغن ماهی در مقایسه با جیره‌های حاوی روغن سویا کاهش یافت. گوارش‌پذیری ظاهری ماده خشک و عصاره اتری در کل دستگاه گوارش در جیره‌هایی بر پایه ذرت در مقایسه با جیره‌هایی بر پایه جو بیش‌تر بودند. روغن ماهی گوارش‌پذیری ظاهری کربوهیدرات غیر الیافی و عصاره اتری را در مقایسه با روغن سویا کاهش داد. غلظت مولاری پروپیونات متأثر از اثر متقابل بین اثرات اصلی شد. در جیره‌هایی بر پایه جو در مقایسه با جیره‌هایی بر پایه ذرت، غلظت مولاری پروپیونات شکمبه گاوهای تغذیه شده با روغن سویا افزایش یافت. منبع غله تأثیری بر تولید شیر و ترکیبات آن نداشت. روغن ماهی در مقایسه با روغن سویا تولید شیر و ترکیبات آن را به طور منفی تحت تأثیر قرار داد. بین تیمارهای آزمایشی بازده خوراک بدون تغییر باقی ماند. نتایج نشان داد اثر متقابلی بین منبع غله و مکمل روغن بر عملکرد تولیدی گاوهای شیری وجود ندارد. تغذیه روغن ماهی در مقایسه با روغن سویا (اما نه تغییر دادن تخمیرپذیری جیره‌ها) با کم کردن ماده خشک مصرفی عملکرد تولیدی گاوهای شیری را تحت تأثیر قرار نداد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation Parameters, and Production Performance in Response to Dietary Grain Source and Oil Supplement of Holstein Dairy Cows

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahryar Kargar 1
  • Gholamreza Ghorbanei kharage 2
  • Mohammad Khorvash 2
1 Shiraz University
2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction High-producing dairy cows require large amounts of concentrates that are rich in energy and crude protein to meet their nutrient requirements. Cereal grains and oil supplements are commonly used for increasing energy density of diets fed to high-producing dairy cows. Dietary grain source (barley vs. corn) and oil supplement (soybean- vs. fish oil) resulted in varied dry matter intake and milk production responses in different research studies based on effects on nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation characteristics. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to determine the effects of, and interactions between, grain source and oil supplement on the feed intake, rumen fermentation characteristics, nutrient digestibility and lactational performance of Holstein cows.
Materials and Methods Eight lactating multiparous Holstein cows (parity = 3.3 ± 1.3 and days in milk = 77 ± 22.1; mean ± SD), were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design with 25-d periods. Each experimental period consisted of an 18-d diet adaptation period and a 7-d collection period. Cows within a square were assigned randomly to dietary treatments. Cows were blocked into 2 squares of 4 cows each based upon milk production, and days in milk, and within blocks were assigned to 1 of the 4 experimental diets with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement: 1) BF = barley-based diet supplemented with fish oil at 2% of dietary DM, 2) BS = barley-based diet supplemented with soybean oil at 2% of dietary DM, 3) CF = corn-based diet supplemented with fish oil at 2% of dietary DM, and 4) CS = corn-based diet supplemented with soybean oil at 2% of dietary DM. The TMR amounts offered and refused were measured daily for each cow and DMI determined daily for each cow. Cows were milked three times daily at 0200, 1000, and 1800 h in a herringbone milking parlor. Milk yield for all cows was recorded and sampled at each milking during the last 7 d of each period. Milk samples were composited in proportion to milk yield, preserved with potassium dichromate, stored at 4°C, and analyzed for fat, protein, lactose, and total solids using an infrared analyzer (MilkoScan 134 BN; Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark). At the end of each experimental period, rumen samples were obtained at 4 h after the morning feeding using the stomach tube technique. Rumen pH was determined immediately after the samples were collected using a mobile pH meter (HI 8314 membrane pH meter, Hanna Instruments, Villafranca, Italy). Rumen fluid samples were acidified by sulfuric acid and analyzed for volatile fatty acid by gas chromatography (model no. CP-9002 Vulcanusweg 259 a.m., Chrompack, Delft, the Netherlands). Two fecal grab samples per cow were taken from the rectum twice daily across day 19 to 23 of each period and frozen at −20°C until analyzed. Acid detergent insoluble ash was used as an internal marker to determine apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility. Data were composited within period and analyzed with the MIXED MODEL procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, 2003) to account for effects of square, period within square, cow within square, treatments (grain source and oil supplement), and the interaction between grain source (barley vs. corn) and oil supplement (fish oil vs. soybean oil).
Results and Discussion Apparent total-tract digestibility of dry matter (P = 0.05) and ether extract (P < 0.01) were greater in the corn- vs. barley-based diets. Fish oil tended (P = 0.07) to decrease and decreased (P = 0.03) apparent total-tract digestibility of non-fibrous carbohydrate and ether extract as compared to soybean oil, respectively. An interaction of main treatment effects tended to occur for molar concentration of propionate (P = 0.09). Barley-based diets increased molar concentration of propionate compared to corn-based diets for cows fed soybean oil, but not for cows fed fish oil. Dry matter intake tended (P = 0.09) to be greater for barley- vs. corn-based diets, but was reduced for the fish oil compared to soybean oil supplemented diets (P < 0.01). Grain source did not affect milk yield or milk composition. Compared to soybean oil, fish oil negatively affected milk yield and milk composition. Feed efficiency remained unchanged among treatments.
Conclusion Results indicated that grain source and oil supplement do not interact to affect productive performance of lactating cows. Due to lowering DM intake, feeding fish- vs. soybean-oil, but not changing diets fermentability, did not influence production performance of lactating cows.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Barley grain
  • Corn grain
  • Dairy cow
  • Fish oil
  • Soybean oil
1. AbuGhazaleh, A. A., D. J. Schingoethe, A. R. Hippen, K. F. Kalscheur, and L. A. Whitlock. 2002. Fatty acid profiles of milk and rumen digesta from cows fed fish oil, extruded soybeans or their blend. Journal of Dairy Science, 85:2266–2276.
2. Ahnadi, C. E., N. Beswick, L. Delbecchi, J. J. Kenelly, and P. Lacasse. 2002. Addition of fish oil to diets for dairy cows. II. Effects on milk fat and gene expression of mammary lipogenic enzymes. Journal of Dairy Research, 69:521–531.
3. Alizadeh, A. R., M. Alikhani, G. R. Ghorbani, H. R. Rahmani, L. Rashidi, and J. J. Loor. 2012. Effects of feeding roasted safflower seeds (variety IL-111) and fish oil on dry matter intake, performance and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 96:466–473.
4. Beauchemin, K. A. and L. M. Rode. 1997. Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fiber in dairy cow diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or corn. Journal of Dairy Science, 80:1629–1639.
5. Casper, D. P., H. A. Maiga, M. J. Brouk, and D. J. Schingoethe. 1999. Synchronization of carbohydrate and protein sources on fermentation and passage rates in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 82:1779–1790.
6. Donovan, D. C., D. J. Schingoethe, R. J. Baer, J. Ryali, A. R. Hippen, and S. T. Franklin. 2000. Influence of dietary fish oil on conjugated linoleic acid and other fatty acids in milk fat from lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 83:2620–2628.
7. Doreau, M. and Y. Chilliard. 1997. Effects of ruminal or postruminal fish oil supplementation on intake and digestion in dairy cows. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 37:113–124.
8. Gozho, G. N., M. R. Hobin, and T. Mutsvangwa. 2008. Interactions between barley grain processing and source of supplemental dietary fat on nitrogen metabolism and urea-nitrogen recycling in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 91:247–259.
9. Kargar, S., G. R. Ghorbani, M. Alikhani, M. Khorvash, L. Rashidi, and D. J. Schingoethe. 2012. Lactational performance and milk fatty acid profile of Holstein cows in response to dietary fat supplements and forage:concentrate ratio. Livestock Science, 150:274–283.
10. Kargar, S., M. Khorvash, G. R. Ghorbani, M. Alikhani, and W. Z. Yang. 2010. Short communication: Effects of dietary fat supplements and forage:concentrate ratio on feed intake, feeding, and chewing behavior of Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93:4297–4301.
11. Khorasani, G. R., E. K. Okine, and J. J. Kennelly. 2001. Effects of substituting barley grain with corn on ruminal fermentation characteristics, milk yield, and milk composition of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 84:2760–2769.
12. Maxin, G., D. R. Ouellet, and H. Lapierre. 2013. Effect of substitution of soybean meal by canola meal or distillers grains in dairy rations on amino acid and glucose availability. Journal of Dairy Science, 96:7806–7817.
13. McCarthy, R. D. J., T. H. Klusmeyer, J. L. Vicini, J. H. Clark, and D. R. Nelson. 1989. Effects of source of protein and carbohydrate on ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the small intestine of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 72:2002–2016.
14. Mohammed, R., J. J. Kennelly, J. K. G. Kramer, K. A. Beauchemin, C. S. Stanton, and J. J. Murphy. 2010. Effect of grain type and processing method on rumen fermentation and milk rumenic acid production. Animal, 4:1425–1444.
15. Nasrollahi, S. M., M. Khorvash, G. R. Ghorbani, A. Teimouri-Yansari, A. Zali, and Q. Zebeli. 2012. Grain source and marginal changes in forage particle size modulate digestive processes and nutrient intake of dairy cows. Animal, 6:1237–1245.
16. Nocek, J. E. and S. Tamminga. 1991. Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74:3598–3629.
17. NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.
18. Reynolds, C. K. 2006. Production and metabolic effects of site of starch digestion in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 130:78–94.
19. Sadri, H., G. R. Ghorbani, H. R. Rahmani, A. H. Samie, M. Khorvash, and R. M. Bruckmaier. 2009. Chromium supplementation and substitution of barley grain with corn: Effects on performance and lactation in periparturient dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92:5411–5418.
20. Silveira, C., M. Oba, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. Helm. 2007. Effect of grains differing in expected ruminal fermentability on the productivity of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 90:2852–2859.
21. Sutton, J. D., R. Knight, A. B. McAllan, and R. H. Smith. 1983. Digestion and synthesis in the rumen of sheep given diets supplemented with free and protected oils. British Journal of Nutrition, 49 419–432.
22. Van Keulen, J. and B. A. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science, 44:282–287.
23. Whitlock, L. A., D. J. Schingoethe, A. R. Hippen, K. F. Kalscheur, R. J. Baer, N. Ramaswamy, and K. M. Kasperson. 2002. Fish oil and extruded soybeans fed in combination increase conjugated linoleic acids in milk of dairy cows more than when fed separately. Journal of Dairy Science, 85:234–243.
CAPTCHA Image